Science and Ideology at the Turn of the 1930—1940s: towards the Reconstruction of the Scientific Biography of Vasily Struve

Bukharin, Mikhail

doi:10.18254/S207987840021203-2

Home>Issue 4 (114)>Science and Ideology at the Turn of the 1930—1940s: towards the Reconstruction of the Scientific Biography of Vasily Struve

Science and Ideology at the Turn of the 1930—1940s: towards the Reconstruction of the Scientific Biography of Vasily Struve

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

Science and Ideology at the Turn of the 1930—1940s: towards the Reconstruction of the Scientific Biography of Vasily Struve

Annotation

PII

S207987840021203-2-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840021203-2

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Mikhail Bukharin Send message

ORCID: 0000-0002-3590-016X

Affiliation: Institute of World History RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Edition

Volume 13 Issue 4 (114)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the reconstruction of the scientific biography of Vasily Struve at the turn of the 1930—1940s, which can be regarded as reflection of the general evolution of historical science in the USSR. Struve played an important role in the development of scientific policy in the USSR in the 1930s, he substantiated a number of important theses that determined the attitude of the authorities not only to historical science in particular, but also to science in general in the USSR. Struve himself sought to show loyalty to the teachings of the classics of Marxism-Leninism of the Soviet edition, but it was namely in this aspect that he failed. As Struve’s speech at the discussion of volume II of World History in 1940 shows, he was inclined to fidelity to facts, and not ideological schemes, which he was rather forced to pay tribute to. Nevertheless, Struve was not considered an ally either for the authorities or among the new generation of Marxist scholars who turned the Soviet Marxist scheme of historical progress against Struve himself — one of its authors. The desire to sit on two chairs was one of the factors that did not allow the talent of the Struve-scientist to develop fully, while the efforts of the Struve-administrator to develop scientific policy in the USSR were ultimately in vain.

Keywords

history of science, scientific policy, world history, historical progress, Marxism, state and science, archives, Vasily Struve

Received

09.04.2022

Publication date

30.06.2022

Number of characters

26191

Number of purchasers

Views

573

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Bukharin M. Science and Ideology at the Turn of the 1930—1940s: towards the Reconstruction of the Scientific Biography of Vasily Struve // ISTORIYA. – 2022. – V. 13. – Issue 4 (114). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840021203-2-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840021203-2
MLA	Bukharin, Mikhail "Science and Ideology at the Turn of the 1930—1940s: towards the Reconstruction of the Scientific Biography of Vasily Struve." ISTORIYA. 13.4 (114) (2022). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840021203-2
APA	Bukharin M. (2022). Science and Ideology at the Turn of the 1930—1940s: towards the Reconstruction of the Scientific Biography of Vasily Struve. ISTORIYA. vol. 13, no. 4 (114) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840021203-2

Full text is available to subscribers only

Subscribe right now

Only article and additional services

Subscription benefits

200 RUB / 1.0 SU

Whole issue and additional services

Subscription benefits

920 RUB / 10.0 SU

All issues and additional services for 2022

Subscription benefits

5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Anan'ev V. G., Bukharin M. D. «Imena, kotorye nikogda ne budut zabyty…». Rossijskoe vostokovedenie v perepiske V. V. Bartol'da, N. Ya. Marra i S. F. Ol'denburga. M.: Varfolomeev A. D., 2020.

2. Anan'ev V. G., Bukharin M. D. Akademik S. A. Zhebelyov i Gosudarstvennyj Ehrmitazh // Journal of Modern Russian History and Historiography. 2018. №11. S. 43—70.

3. Anan'ev V. G., Bukharin M. D. S. A. Zhebelyov v sisteme sovetskoj nauki. I: 1917—1927 // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 2020. № 2. S. 52—67.

4. Anan'ev V. G., Bukharin M. D. S. A. Zhebelyov v sisteme sovetskoj nauki. II: 1927—1932 // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 2020. № 3. S. 698—718.

5. Anan'ev V. G., Bukharin M. D. S. A. Zhebelyov v sisteme sovetskoj nauki. III: 1933—1940 // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 2021. № 1 (81). S. 198—210.

6. Anan'ev V. G., Bukharin M. D. S. A. Zhebelyov v sisteme sovetskoj nauki. IV: S. A. Zhebelyov — zasluzhennyj deyatel' nauki RSFSR // Vestnik Drevnej Istorii. 2021. № 2 (81). S. 491—508.

7. Anan'ev V. G., Bukharin M. D. V. V. Struve i Institut istorii iskusstv (k istorii slozheniya kontseptsii sotsial'noj revolyutsii na Drevnem Vostoke) // Vestnik Drevnej Istorii. 2018. № 4. S. 971—989.

8. Bukharin M. D. Vasilij Struve i slozhenie kategorial'nogo apparata sovetskoj istoricheskoj nauki // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Istoriya. 2019. № 4. S. 1440—1458.

9. Bukharin M. D., Krikh S. B. Istorik Vostoka v ehpokhu peremen: raboty V. V. Struve i soveschanie v OON AN SSSR v iyule 1936 g. // Vostok. 2020. № 6. S. 196‒206.

10. Kirillova M. “I’m a Factlover”: Segey Zhebelyov and Soviet Ancient History in the Early 1930s // ISTORIYA. 2020. Vol. 11. Issue 1 (87). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840008205-4-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840008205-4

11. Ladynin I. A. Kontseptsiya feodalizma na drevnem Vostoke i raboty V. V Struve 1910-kh — nachala 1930-kh gg. // Dialog so vremenem. 2019. Vyp. 69. S. 251—267.