“Russian Name” and “Russian Prestige” as Categories of Perception and Comprehension of Russian Policy in Iran in the 19th — Early 20th Centuries
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
“Russian Name” and “Russian Prestige” as Categories of Perception and Comprehension of Russian Policy in Iran in the 19th — Early 20th Centuries
Annotation
PII
S207987840021056-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Andrey Larin 
Affiliation: Institute of World History RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

The article is devoted to the concepts of “Russian name”, “Russian prestige”, “dignity of Russia”, etc., which are significant for the discourse of Russian policy in Qajar Iran. It is shown that these categories were used in the formulation of political agenda in the Iranian direction during the “long 19th century”. The need to maintain the “prestige” of Russia, the high status of the “Russian name” is becoming an important element of both understanding Russia’s policy in Persia and motivating certain decisions. Special attention is paid to those advantages (both real or imagined), which, in the perception of contemporaries, entailed the maintenance of the high status of the “Russian name” in Persia.

Keywords
Qajar Iran, Russian Empire, “Russian name”, “Russian prestige”, “dignity of Russia”, orientalism, civilizing mission
Received
06.02.2022
Publication date
30.06.2022
Number of characters
39689
Number of purchasers
12
Views
510
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2022

References

1. Artamonov L. K. Astrabad-Shakhrudskij rajon i Severnyj Khorasan. Voenno-statisticheskoe issledovanie. Tiflis, 1894.

2. Berezin I. Puteshestvie po Severnoj Persii. Kazan', 1852.

3. Berzhe A. P. Posol'stvo A. P. Ermolova v Persiyu. Istoricheskij ocherk // Russkaya starina. № 7. 1877.

4. Berzhe A. P. Smert' Griboedova // Russkaya starina. № 8. 1872.

5. Berzhe A. P. Khosrov-mirza. 1813—1875 // Russkaya starina. T. XXV. 1879.

6. Diplomaticheskaya poezdka Ali-Yuz-Bashi Karabagskogo k Abbas-Mirze: iz arkhivnykh materialov o missii A. S. Griboedova v Irane // Izvestiya AN AzSSR. Seriya obschestvennykh nauk. № 8. 1962.

7. Eliseev A. Gebrskaya mogila // Russkoe obozrenie. № 7. 1892.

8. Zapiska generala Ermolova o posol'stve v Persiyu v 1817 g. // Chteniya v Imperatorskom obschestve istorii i drevnostej Rossijskikh. Kn. 3. 1866.

9. Iranskaya revolyutsiya 1905—1911 gg. i bol'sheviki Zakavkaz'ya // Krasnyj arkhiv. № 2 (105). 1941.

10. Kozellek R. Sotsial'naya istoriya i istoriya ponyatij // Istoricheskie ponyatiya i politicheskie idei v Rossii XVI—XX vv.: sbornik nauchnykh rabot. SPb., 2006. Vyp. 5. S. 33—53.

11. Larin A. “To the Thunder of Cannon and Joyous Shouts of the Crowd the Shah Entered Astarabad”: Russia, Britain and the Attempt to Restore Mohammad Ali Shah // ISTORIYA. 2018. Vol. 9. Issue 8 (72). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840002504-3-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S0002504-3-1

12. Lomnitskij S. (Rehdzhehp) Persiya i persy. Ehskizy i ocherki. 1898—1899—1900. SPb., 1902.

13. Mirzekhanov V. The Supremacy Idea and Racial Hierarchy in the French Colonial Culture // ISTORIYA. 2014. Vol. 5. Issue 4 (27). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840000720-1-1/

14. Mirzekhanov V. S., Kovalev M. V. Evropejtsy i russkie v koloniyakh i na imperskikh okrainakh: k voprosu o kommunikativnykh praktikakh // Prepodavatel' XXI v. 2016. № 4. Ch. 2. S. 417—427.

15. Mirzekhanov V. S. KhIKh v. v mirovoj istorii (k vykhodu V toma «Vsemirnoj istorii») // Novaya i novejshaya istoriya. 2015. № 4. S. 3—19.

16. Naj Dzh. «Myagkaya sila» i amerikano-evropejskie otnosheniya // Svobodnaya mysl'-KhKhI. 2004. № 10.

17. Ogorodnikov P. Ocherki Persii. SPb., 1878.

18. «Ponyatiya o Rossii»: k istoricheskoj semantike imperskogo perioda. V 2 t. / red. Miller A. I., Sdvizhkov D. A., Shirle I. M., 2012.

19. Savitskij E. E. Byli li kolonial'nye gostinitsy forpostami evropejskoj kul'tury? Svidetel'stva russkikh puteshestvennikov po Niderlandskoj Indii kontsa XIX v. — nachala XX v. // Rossiya i sovremennyj mir. 2020. № 4 (109). S. 23—37.

20. Sbornik diplomaticheskikh dokumentov, kasayuschikhsya sobytij v Persii. Vyp. 7. SPb., 1913.

21. Simonich I. O. Vospominaniya polnomochnogo ministra: 1832—1838 gg. M., 1967.

22. Slovar' osnovnykh istoricheskikh ponyatij: izbrannye stat'i v 2-kh t. / sost. Zaretskij Yu., Levinson K., Shirle I. M., 2014.

23. Sokolov A. E. Dnevnye zapiski o puteshestvii rossijsko-imperatorskogo posol'stva v Persii v 1816—1817 gg. M., 1910.

24. Soplenkov S. V. Doroga v Arzrum: rossijskaya obschestvennaya mysl' o Vostoke (pervaya polovina XIX v.). M., 2000.

25. Stranichka iz istorii nashikh otnoshenij s Persiej v 1829 g. // Istoricheskij vestnik. № 1. 1890.

26. Fuko M. Arkheologiya znaniya. SPb., 2004.

27. Fuko M. Slova i veschi: arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. SPb., 1994.

28. Scheglov A. N. Krovavaya stranitsa persidskoj istorii // Istoricheskij vestnik. № 1. 1911.

29. Yuzefovich L. A. «Kak v posol'skikh obychayakh vedetsya…»: Russkij posol'skij obychaj kontsa XV v. — nachala XVII v. M., 1988.

30. Imperium inter pares: rol' transferov v istorii Rossijskoj imperii (1700—1917): Sbornik statej / red. Aust M., Vul'pius R., Miller A. M., 2010.

31. Kazemzadeh F. Russia and Britain in Persia, 1864—1914. A Study in Imperialism. New Haven; L., 1968.

32. McDaniel R. A. The Shuster Mission and the Persian Constitutional Revolution. Minneapolis, 1974.

33. Nye J. S. Bound to lead: the changing nature of American power. N. Y., 1990.

34. Nye J.S. Soft power: the means to success in world politics. N. Y., 2004.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate