Organization of the Russian Diplomatic Representation in the United Kingdom of Sweden and Norway at the turn of the 19th — 20th Centuries
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Organization of the Russian Diplomatic Representation in the United Kingdom of Sweden and Norway at the turn of the 19th — 20th Centuries
Annotation
PII
S207987840028007-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Lyudmila Sadova 
Affiliation: Institute of World History RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

The Scandinavian vector in the foreign policy of the Russian Empire was far from a priority, but at the turn of the 19th — 20th centuries, the calm and non-conflicting European North, which it remained for many years, became involved in the political and strategic interests of the great powers, primarily Russia, Germany and Great Britain, and therefore attracted the attention of Russian diplomacy. The aggravation of the Swedish-Norwegian political crisis in the 1890s — 1900s, which ended with the dissolution of the Swedish-Norwegian union and Norway's independence in 1905, caused a lot of concern to the Russian Foreign Ministry, forced it to pay attention to many issues of bilateral relations with Sweden and Norway, which had previously remained in the shadows, to closely monitor not only the development of the conflict between two Scandinavian states, but also the position of other interested great powers. The reports of the Russian envoys in the United Kingdom, who closely watched the course of events, were one of the main sources for the Foreign Ministry. The main objective of this article is to identify the peculiarities of the work of the Russian diplomatic corps in Sweden and Norway at the turn of the 19th — 20th centuries. An attempt was also made to determine the range of sources of information of Russian diplomats, the degree of influence of foreign policy tasks on the selection and presentation of information by envoys to the central office, as well as the presence of their personal attitude to the events on the Scandinavian Peninsula in diplomatic correspondence. It was concluded that the specifics of the activities of the Russian imperial mission in the United Kingdoms of Sweden and Norway was due to the peripheral position of small countries in the region in the foreign policy of the Russian Empire. The work of the mission was influenced by current foreign policy tasks, legal features of the Swedish-Norwegian union, personal preferences and the existing experience of the diplomatic representative of Russia.

Keywords
The United Kingdoms of Sweden and Norway, the diplomatic service of the Russian Empire, diplomatic competencies, the Swedish-Norwegian political crisis, the Swedish-Norwegian union
Received
02.07.2023
Publication date
26.10.2023
Number of characters
53883
Number of purchasers
11
Views
196
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2023

References

1. Vitte S. Yu. Vospominaniya. Berlin, 1922.

2. Georgiev A. V. Dokumenty posol'stv i missij Rossii kak istochnik dlya izucheniya roli zagranichnoj sluzhby MID vo vneshnepoliticheskom apparate samoderzhaviya // Istoriya SSSR. 1988. № 4. S. 134—149.

3. Davydov R. A. Narodnye volneniya v Severnoj Norvegii, slukhi o russkoj ugroze i massovoj izmene norvezhtsev v pol'zu Rossii (po doneseniyam russkogo konsula O. Vizelya letom 1903 goda) // Skandinavskie chteniya: ehtnograficheskie i kul'turno-istoricheskie aspekty. SPb., 2012. S. 332—346.

4. Zonova T. V. Osnovnye ehtapy stanovleniya rossijskoj diplomaticheskoj sluzhby (1549—1917 gg.) // Diplomaticheskaya sluzhba. M., 2003.

5. Ignat'ev A. V. Baltijskij vopros vo vneshnej politike Rossii 1905—1907 gg. // Voprosy istorii. 1986. № 3. S. 22—37.

6. Karelin V. A. «Chelovek v futlyare»: russkij poslannik v Khristianii v 1912—1916 gg. — Sergej Vasil'evich Arsen'ev // Grani sotrudnichestva: Rossiya i Severnaya Evropa: sbornik nauchnykh statej. Petrozavodsk, 2012. S. 154—169.

7. Karelin V. A. Anatolij Nikolaevich Krupenskij: pervyj diplomaticheskij predstavitel' Rossii v nezavisimoj Norvegii (1905—1912) // Vestnik Barents-tsentra MGPU. 2009. Vyp. 8. S. 95—98.

8. Kasian A. “Russian threat” to Norway (XIX — early XX c.) in foreign historiography and home sources // ISTORIYA. 2011. Vol. 2. Issue 5. URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840000114-4-2/

9. Peresadilo R. V., Repnevskij A. V. Kadry i organizatsiya torgovo-diplomaticheskoj raboty Rossii v Norvegii: sravnitel'naya kharakteristika (XIX vek — 30-e gody XX veka) // Severnaya Evropa: Problemy istorii. M., 2003. Vyp. 4. S. 191—210.

10. Rybachenok I. S. Reformirovanie rossijskogo MID v 1802—1914 gg.: osnovnye ehtapy, tendentsii i rezul'taty // Rossijskaya istoriya. Vyp. 6. 2020. S. 90—110.

11. Sadova L. A. Konsul'skij vopros» kak povod k rastorzheniyu shvedsko-norvezhskoj unii v 1905 g. // Skandinavskie chteniya 2005. MAEh RAN SPb, 2005. C. 32—43.

12. Sadova L. A. Obostrenie shvedsko-norvezhskogo konflikta v 1895 g. Po dokumentam rossijskikh diplomatov // Novaya i Novejshaya istoriya. 2021. № 5. S. 165—179.

13. Sadova L. The Political Life of Norway and Swedish-Norwegian Conflict in Russian Diplomats Reports in 1890’s // ISTORIYA. 2017. Vol. 8. Issue 4 (58). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840001843-6-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S0001843-6-1

14. Solov'ev Yu. Ya. Vospominaniya diplomata. 1893—1922. M., 1939.

15. Chernysheva O. V. Shvedy i russkie: obraz soseda. M., 2004.

16. Berghei J-T. Russland i norsk presse. En undersøkelse av hovedstadsavisene i perioden 1880—1905. Masteroppgave i historie. Tromsø, 2010.

17. Leira H., Neumann I. B. Fremmede konsuler i Norge ca. 1660—1905 // Historisk Tidsskrift. Vol. 106. 2006. S. 449—487.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate