Semiotic Diagnostics of the Trajectory Splitting between a Dream of the Past and Dream of the Future

Melik-Gajkazyan, Irina

doi:10.18254/S207987840021199-7

English

Home>Issue 4 (114)>Semiotic Diagnostics of the Trajectory Splitting between a Dream of the Past and Dream of the Future

Semiotic Diagnostics of the Trajectory Splitting between a Dream of the Past and Dream of the Future

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

Semiotic Diagnostics of the Trajectory Splitting between a Dream of the Past and Dream of the Future

Annotation

PII

S207987840021199-7-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840021199-7

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Irina Melik-Gajkazyan Send message

Affiliation: Tomsk State Pedagogical University
Address: Russian Federation, Tomsk

Edition

Volume 13 Issue 4 (114)

Abstract

All areas of humanitarian and social knowledge include the study of the interactions between the individual, society and culture. Such an interaction is considered in the article through the prism of the phenomenon of a dream. In society, among the forces are acting there, a collective dream has a special power. In culture, the collective dream creates two forms: myth (dream of the past) and utopia (dream of the future). The measure of adherence to the forms of the collective dream and/or the degree of independent interpretation of the symbolism of myth and utopia becomes a characteristic of the individual. The proposed perspective is justified by the fact that the trajectories of the collective dream symbolism translation are visualised by the sociocultural dynamics model. The model combines ideas of the semiotic mechanism of culture (Ju. Lotman, B. Uspensky) and the basic stages of information processes. The distribution of information characteristics across the stages of sociocultural dynamics, firstly, reveals the trajectories of a dream transformation. Secondly, it opens up methodological possibilities of verifying the study results for the role and place of the “dreaming subject” obscured by the “big processes” of the history of culture.

Keywords

model, information processes, visual semiotics, collective dream, dreaming subject

Received

07.11.2021

Publication date

30.06.2022

Number of characters

31984

Number of purchasers

Views

679

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Melik-Gajkazyan I. Semiotic Diagnostics of the Trajectory Splitting between a Dream of the Past and Dream of the Future // ISTORIYA. – 2022. – V. 13. – Issue 4 (114). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840021199-7-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840021199-7
MLA	Melik-Gajkazyan, Irina "Semiotic Diagnostics of the Trajectory Splitting between a Dream of the Past and Dream of the Future." ISTORIYA. 13.4 (114) (2022). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840021199-7
APA	Melik-Gajkazyan I. (2022). Semiotic Diagnostics of the Trajectory Splitting between a Dream of the Past and Dream of the Future. ISTORIYA. vol. 13, no. 4 (114) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840021199-7

Full text is available to subscribers only

Subscribe right now

Only article and additional services

Subscription benefits

200 RUB / 1.0 SU

Whole issue and additional services

Subscription benefits

920 RUB / 10.0 SU

All issues and additional services for 2022

Subscription benefits

5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Batalov Eh. Ya. Politicheskaya utopiya XX v.: voprosy teorii i istorii. M., 1996.

2. Var'yash I. Raj otmenyaetsya? // Anatomiya vlasti: gosudari i poddannye v Evrope v Srednie veka i Novoe vremya / pod red. O. G. Voskobojnikova, O. I. Togoevoj. M.: Natsional'nyj issledovatel'skij universitet «Vysshaya shkola ehkonomiki», 2021. S. 376—386.

3. Lotman Yu. M. Vmesto predisloviya // Lotman Yu. M. Izbrannye stat'i: V 3-kh t. T. 1. Tallinn, 1992. S. 9—10.

4. Lotman Yu. M. Klio na rasput'e (Ideya zakonomernosti istoricheskogo razvitiya i ee ehvolyutsiya v evropejskoj i russkoj nauke XVII—XX vv.: primenitel'no k sovremennoj situatsii) // Nashe nasledie, 1988, № 5. S. 1—4.

5. Lotman Yu. M., Uspenskij B. Yu. O semioticheskom mekhanizme kul'tury // Lotman Yu. M. Izbrannye stat'i: V 3-kh t. T. 3. Tallinn, 1993. S. 326—344.

6. Melik-Gajkazyan I. V. Informatsionnye protsessy i real'nost'. M., 1998.

7. Najman E. A. Antichnaya meditsinskaya simptomatologiya i sovremennaya semioticheskaya teoriya // Schole. Filosofskoe antikovedenie i klassicheskaya traditsiya. 2014. T. 8. № 1. S. 473—479.

8. Novosyolova E. V. Zhivopis' shkoly Kusko kak mirovozzrencheskaya model' // ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problemy vizual'noj semiotiki. 2021. № 1. S. 124—141.

9. Pichugina V. K., Mozhajskij A. Yu. Tragicheskaya vizualizatsiya obrazovatel'nogo prostranstva Fiv v «Fivaide» Statsiya // ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problemy vizual'noj semiotiki. 2020. № 3. S. 99—117.

10. Prigozhin I. R., Stengers I. Vremya, khaos, kvant. M., 1994.

11. Smirnov S. V. «Govoryaschie golovy»: modusy narrativnosti tsarskogo monetnogo portreta ehpokhi ehllinizma // ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problemy vizual'noj semiotiki. 2020. № 2. S. 251—266.

12. Tolmacheva E. B. Konstruirovanie ehtnicheskogo obraza: podkhody k vizualizatsii istoricheskikh i kul'turnykh faktov (na primere fotodokumentov iz sobraniya I.S. Polyakova) // ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problemy vizual'noj semiotiki. 2021. № 1. C. 180—200.

13. Uvarov P. Yu. Chuma v Provene 1582–1583 gg. K voprosu o patologoanatomii vlasti // Anatomiya vlasti: gosudari i poddannye v Evrope v Srednie veka i Novoe vremya / pod red. O. G. Voskobojnikova, O. I. Togoevoj. M.: Natsional'nyj issledovatel'skij universitet «Vysshaya shkola ehkonomiki». 2021. S. 459—482.

14. Yakovleva A. F., Selezneva A. V., Emel'yanova N. N. Obraz nauki v predstavleniyakh molodykh uchenykh: sotsiokul'turnye izmereniya // ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problemy vizual'noj semiotiki. 2020. № 4. S. 194—213.

15. Whitehead A.N. Process and Reality. N. Y.: The Macmillan Company, 1929.

16. Whitehead A.N. Symbolism, Its Meaning and Effect. N. Y.: The Macmillan Company, 1927.