The French Court Historical Writing as a Form of Manifestation of the Royal Power (Late 16th — First Half of 17th Century)

Terenteva, Ekaterina

doi:10.18254/S207987840018884-1

Home>Issue 1 (111)>The French Court Historical Writing as a Form of Manifestation of the Royal Power (Late 16th — First Half of 17th Century)

The French Court Historical Writing as a Form of Manifestation of the Royal Power (Late 16th — First Half of 17th Century)

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

The French Court Historical Writing as a Form of Manifestation of the Royal Power (Late 16th — First Half of 17th Century)

Annotation

PII

S207987840018884-1-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840018884-1

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Ekaterina Terenteva Send message

ORCID: 0000-0003-2254-858X

Affiliation: Bonch-Bruevich Saint Petersburg State University of Telecommunications
Address: Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Edition

Volume 13 Issue 1 (111)

Abstract

The present paper argues that the French historical writing in the late sixteenth and in the first half of the seventeenth century became a form of manifestation of the French royal power. The integrated scientific approach chosen in this research permits the author to draw several new conclusions concerning the multiplicity of forms of publicity of the French absolute monarchy. Three main aspects are in question: the institutional (or socio-political) one, the aspect of publishing specific in early modern Europe, and the substantial aspect of the historical discourse of the epoch. The existence of the court office of the royal historiographer (historiographe du roi) itself was a form of manifestation of the French royal power as it symbolized the special assignment of historical knowledge to the crown. Another visible form of manifestation of the French royal power connected with the historical writing of the epoch was the form of existence of works consecrated to historical subjects, i.e. the peculiarities of design of the editions of historical writings. Finally, the subject area of historical works in question were also related to the manifestation of the strengthening absolute monarchy. The court historical writing in early modern France evolved in tight connection with the erudite intellectual movement. Thus, however diverse the erudite movement had been, its massive current was deeply connected with the crown and its different ambitions — from uniting territories and gaining fidelity of its subjects to glorifying the French kings and controlling all the spheres of political and cultural life in the kingdom.

Keywords

historical writing, France, erudites, power, monarchy, publicity, sixteenth century, seventeenth century, historiographe du roi, book

Received

30.08.2021

Publication date

15.02.2022

Number of characters

47391

Number of purchasers

Views

694

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Terenteva E. The French Court Historical Writing as a Form of Manifestation of the Royal Power (Late 16th — First Half of 17th Century) // ISTORIYA. – 2022. – V. 13. – Issue 1 (111). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840018884-1-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840018884-1
MLA	Terenteva, Ekaterina "The French Court Historical Writing as a Form of Manifestation of the Royal Power (Late 16th — First Half of 17th Century)." ISTORIYA. 13.1 (111) (2022). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840018884-1
APA	Terenteva E. (2022). The French Court Historical Writing as a Form of Manifestation of the Royal Power (Late 16th — First Half of 17th Century). ISTORIYA. vol. 13, no. 1 (111) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840018884-1

Full text is available to subscribers only

Subscribe right now

Only article and additional services

Subscription benefits

200 RUB / 1.0 SU

Whole issue and additional services

Subscription benefits

920 RUB / 10.0 SU

All issues and additional services for 2022

Subscription benefits

5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Palamarchuk A. A., Fedorov S. E. Antikvarnyj diskurs v rannestyuartovskoj Anglii / otv. red. Khachaturyan N. A. SPb., 2015.

2. Pronina E. A. «Ottsy istorii» Frantsii i Velikobritanii: Andre Dyushen i Uil'yam Kehmden (k voprosu o zarozhdenii natsional'nogo istoriopisaniya v stranakh Evropy rannego novogo vremeni) // Klio. № 2 (62). 2012. S. 86—88.

3. Pronina E. A. V poiskakh identichnosti: ehrudity i frantsuzskaya monarkhiya v rannee Novoe vremya // Sotsial'nye svyazi i ikh transformatsii v Zapadnoj Evrope XVII v.: kollektivnaya monografiya / otv. red. Vasyutin S. A., Kim O. V. Kemerovskij gosudarstvennyj universitet. Kemerovo: Kuzbassvuzizdat, 2014. S. 214 — 226.

4. Pronina E. A. Perom o shpage: genealogii frantsuzskogo i flamandskogo dvoryanstva Andre Dyushena // Vestn. S.-Peterb. un-ta. Ser. 2. SPb., 2011. Vyp. 2. S. 111—117.

5. Pronina E. A. Frantsuzskaya i anglijskaya identichnosti skvoz' prizmu evropejskogo istoriopisaniya rannego Novogo vremeni (na materiale naslediya Andre Dyushena i Uil'yama Kehmdena) // Klio. № 11 (71). 2012. S. 40 — 45.

6. Pronina E. A. Istoriya na sluzhbe u korolya i kardinala: otets i syn Dyusheny // Klio. № 2 (53). 2011. S. 39—43.

7. Terent'eva E. A. “Ratio” rannego Novogo vremeni v trudakh frantsuzskikh ehruditov na primere naslediya Andre i Fransua Dyushenov // Roman s Klio: sbornik nauchnykh statej i yubilejnykh materialov, posvyaschennyj 60-letiyu Poltoraka S. N. / nauch. red. Eremeeva A. N., Izmozik V. S. SPb.: Evropejskij Dom, 2016. S. 388—395.

8. Terent'eva E. A., Palamarchuk A. A. Rozhdenie natsional'nogo istoriopisaniya vo Frantsii: trudy i istoricheskij metod Andre Dyushena // Vestn. S.-Peterb. un-ta. Ser. 2. SPb., 2015. Vyp. 2. S. 80—92.

9. Fyodorov S. The “British” History of William Camden // ISTORIYA. 2016. Vol. 7. Issue 2 (46). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840001396-4-1/

10. Tsaturova S. K. Ofitsery vlasti. Parizhskij Parlament v pervoj treti XV v. M.: Logos, 2002.

11. Bourquin L. La noblesse dans la France moderne (XVIe — XVIIIe siécles). P.; Berlin, 2002.

12. Bury E. La tradition gallicane: les historiographes et l’érudition en France (fin XVIe — milieu XVIIe siècle) // Les historiographes en Europe de la fin du moyen âge à la révolution / dir. Ch. Grell. P.: Presses Universitaires Paris-Sorbonne, 2006. P. 313—324.

13. Buttay F. Peindre en leur âme des fantômes. Image et éducation militanta pendant les guerres de Religion. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2018.

14. Chatelain J.-M. Pour la gloire de Dieu et du roi: le livre de prestige au XVIIe siècle // La naissance du Livre moderne (XIVe — XVIIe siècles). Tours: Editions du Cercle de la librairie, 2000. P. 350—363.

15. Febvre L., Martin H.-J. L’apparition du livre. P.: Albin Michel, 1958.

16. Fossier F. A propos du titre d’historiographe sous l’Ancien régime // Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine. Vol. 32. 1985. P. 361—416.

17. Fossier F. La charge d’historiographe du XVIe au XIXe siècle // Revue historique. Vol. 258. 1976. P. 75—92.

18. Les historiographes en Europe de la fin du moyen âge à la révolution / dir. Ch. Grell. P.: Presses Universitaires Paris-Sorbonne, 2006.

19. Martin H.-J. La naissance du Livre moderne (XIVe — XVIIe siècles). Tours: Editions du Cercle de la librairie, 2000.

20. Martin H.-J. Le livre français sous l’Ancien Régime. Nantes: Editions du Cercle de la librairie, 1987.

21. Martin H.-J. Librairie // Dictionnaire de l’Ancien Régime / sous dir. de Bély L. 3ème éd. P.: PUF, 2010. P. 736—737.

22. Martin H.-J. Livre // Dictionnaire de l’Ancien Régime / sous dir. de L. Bély. 3ème éd. P.: PUF, 2010. P. 748—750.

23. Martin H.-J. Livre, pouvoirs et société à Paris au XVIIe siècle (1598—1701). Thèse pour le doctorat ès Lettres et Sciences humains de l’Universtié de Paris. Génève: Librairie Droz, 1969.

24. Martin H.-J. Politique et typographie: la création de l’Imprimerie royale // La naissance du Livre moderne (XIVe — XVIIe siècles). Tours: Editions du Cercle de la librairie, 2000. P. 364—367.

25. Ranum O. Artisans of glory. Writers and Historical Thought in Seventeenth-century France. The University of North Carolina Press, 1980.