Cognitive Strategies for Overcoming Socio-Cultural Threats in Russian Historiography
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Cognitive Strategies for Overcoming Socio-Cultural Threats in Russian Historiography
Annotation
PII
S207987840016866-1-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Pavel Shkarenkov 
Affiliation: Russian State University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Yury Troitsky
Affiliation: Russian State University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

The relevance of resistance to socio-cultural threats and risks is growing exponentially. The strategies of resistance to these threats reconstructed by narratologists have considerable epistemological potential not only in the context of artistic discourse, but also for historiographical reflections. The article presents the following strategies of resistance: agonal, projective, conservative, mobilizing, stoic, illuminative, using the material of different-scale historiographical narratives. It can be argued that the epistemological arsenal of humanitarian research has been enriched with an effective tool, which is used not only to describe, but also to predict the resource possibilities of resistance to socio-cultural threats and risks.

Keywords
socio-cultural threats, resistance strategies, mental horizon, epistemological tools, global risks
Received
28.06.2021
Publication date
15.09.2021
Number of characters
45681
Number of purchasers
16
Views
1938
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2021

References

1. Agratin A. E., Korchinskij A. V., Moiseeva E. Yu., Tyupa V. I. Strategii preodoleniya v khudozhestvennykh narrativakh // Novyj filologicheskij vestnik. 2020. № 4 (55).

2. Alekseev Yu. G. Osvobozhdenie Rusi ot ordynskogo iga. L., 1989.

3. Bezotosnyj V. M. Russkaya razvedka v 1812 g. // V groznuyu poru: k 200-letiyu Otechestvennoj vojny 1812 goda. Smolensk, 2013.

4. Chubaryan A., Pozdnyakova E., Shkarenkov P., Vorobieva O., Zabotkina V. Thesaurus Approach to the Study of Socio-Cultural Threats in Historical Dynamics // ISTORIYA. 2019. Vol. 10. Issue 11 (85). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840008093-1-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840008093-1

5. Nicolai F., Vorobieva O. Neoliberal Risk Management and Challenges of the Anthropocene Epoch in the Optics of English-Language Cultur Studies // ISTORIYA. 2020. Vol. 11. Issue 12 (98). Part II. URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840013176-2-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840013176-2

6. Vorob'eva O. V., Nikolai F. V. Politika pamyati, vyzovy identichnosti i strategii preodoleniya sotsiokul'turnykh ugroz v otsenkakh rossijskikh i angloyazychnykh issledovanij kul'tury // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Ser. «Istoriya». 2020. № 4. DOI 10.17072/2219-3111-2020-4-5-12.

7. Dobrenko E. A. Formovka sovetskogo chitatelya. Sotsial'nye i ehsteticheskie predposylki retseptsii sovetskoj literatury. SPb., 1997.

8. Druzhinin N. M. K voprosu o konservativnykh proektakh otmeny krepostnogo prava // Krest'yanskoe dvizhenie v Rossii: voprosy istorii i istoriografii. M., 1972.

9. Zen'kovskij S. A. Russkoe staroobryadchestvo. Dukhovnye dvizheniya semnadtsatogo veka. M., 1995.

10. Il'in A. A. A. I. Gertsen o probleme politicheskogo nasiliya // Rossiya i sovremennyj mir. 2018. № 1 (98).

11. Isaev A. V. Nazrevshaya diskussiya: razvedka, voennaya doktrina i armiya v iyune 1941 g. // «Nikto ne zabyt, nichto ne zabyto»: sb. st. k 70-letiyu Pobedy v Velikoj otechestvennoj vojne 1941—1945 gg. / pod red. Generala armii M. A. Gareeva. M., 2015.

12. Kelli A. Respublika pod sudom: Gertsen i 1848 god / per. s angl. O. Dubitskoj // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2002. № 1 (53).

13. Nekrasov V. L. Sovetskij ehkonomicheskij reformizm ehpokhi N. S. Khruscheva: avtoritarnyj reformator, partijno-gosudarstvennaya sistema i akademicheskoe soobschestvo // Novyj istoricheskij vestnik. 2017. № 4 (454).

14. Porshnev B. F. Metodologiya issledovaniya. Otvet na vozrazhenie A. L. Yastrebitskoj // Genezis kapitalizma v Evrope. Voprosy, problemy, diskussii / pod red. S. D. Skazkina, A. N. Chistozvonova. M., 1971.

15. Pul'kin M. V. Samosozhzheniya staroobryadtsev (seredina XVII—XIX v.). M., 2013.

16. Pul'kin M. V. Samosozhzheniya staroobryadtsev: problema liderstva // Suitsidologiya. № 1 (14). T. 5. 2014.

17. Rogovin V. Z. Stalinskij neonehp. M., 1995.

18. Strokov A. A. Rol' narodnogo opolcheniya v bor'be protiv pol'sko-shvedskoj interventsii v 1605—1618 gg. // Russkoe voennoe iskusstvo / pod red. gen.-lejt. P. A. Zhilina. M., 1970.

19. Chistyakova E. V. Po sledam istoriograficheskoj diskussii // Istoriya krest'yanstva v Rossii: 1649—1861. Vsesoyuznoe soveschanie istorikov, posvyaschennoe stoletiyu otmeny krepostnogo prava. M., 1962.

20. Shashkov A. T. Avvakum // Pravoslavnaya ehntsiklopediya. T. I. M., 2000.

21. Ehjdel'man N. Ya. Gran' vekov. M., 1986.

22. Delbrück H. Der Begriff der Strategie // Geschichte der Kriegskunst im Rahmen der politischen Geschichte. Bd. 4. Berlin, 1908.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate