Experience of Historical Time Perception and Dissatisfaction with the Temporal Regime

Ionov, Igor

doi:10.18254/S207987840014325-6

English

Home>Issue 4 (102)>Experience of Historical Time Perception and Dissatisfaction with the Temporal Regime

Experience of Historical Time Perception and Dissatisfaction with the Temporal Regime

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

Experience of Historical Time Perception and Dissatisfaction with the Temporal Regime

Annotation

PII

S207987840014325-6-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840014325-6

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Igor Ionov Send message

Affiliation: Institute of World History RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Edition

Volume 12 Issue 4 (102)

Abstract

The article traces the variants and causes of emotionally colored dissatisfaction with the temporal regime. The concept of Z. Bauman's retrotopia with its division of “solid” and “liquid” images of society and time is interpreted in the context of A. Assmann's research of transformations of the Modern chronotope in the later Modern time. The author shows the initial contradictions of the objective and subjective, normative, and relational components of the model of historical time, formed at the end of the 18th — 19th centuries, and their aggravation in the conditions of the crisis of progressivism ideals in the late 19th — 20th centuries. As examples, we consider the ideas of historicism and historicity of J. M. Chladenius, J. G. Droysen, E. Troelch, M. Weber, K. Mannheim, K. Popper, P. Tillich, M. Werner, and B. Zimmermann. The article demonstrates the connection between progressivism ideas, their value load and normative perspectivization, the “solid” and transparent image of time, in which time acquires the properties of the acting and target causes of history. The experience of blurring the “solid” model of time into a “liquid”, subjective and relational model, as well as emotional reactions to this process, is considered using the material of the concepts of historical and non-historical of F. Nietzsche, temporalism and eternalism of P. Sorokin, which allows a deeper understanding of the concept of Z. Bauman. The need of Nietzsche, Sorokin, and Bauman for “solid” temporal models is analyzed in the context of the processes of globalization and the development of consumer society using the concept of the “process of civilization” by N. Elias, the theory of informalization of behavior by C. Wouters and various trends of post-Marxism, in particular the Essex school of discourse analysis and the idea of discursive hegemony.

Keywords

progress, late Modernity, solid time, liquid time, past that has not passed, historical memory, anthropological turn, thick description, informalisation, reformalisation, discursive hegemony, counter-hegemony

Received

13.09.2020

Publication date

17.05.2021

Number of characters

61375

Number of purchasers

Views

1395

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Ionov I. Experience of Historical Time Perception and Dissatisfaction with the Temporal Regime // ISTORIYA. – 2021. – V. 12. – Issue 4 (102). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840014325-6-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840014325-6
MLA	Ionov, Igor "Experience of Historical Time Perception and Dissatisfaction with the Temporal Regime." ISTORIYA. 12.4 (102) (2021). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840014325-6
APA	Ionov I. (2021). Experience of Historical Time Perception and Dissatisfaction with the Temporal Regime. ISTORIYA. vol. 12, no. 4 (102) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840014325-6

Full text is available to subscribers only

Subscribe right now

Only article and additional services

Subscription benefits

200 RUB / 1.0 SU

Whole issue and additional services

Subscription benefits

1000 RUB / 10.0 SU

All issues and additional services for 2021

Subscription benefits

5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Arnautova Yu. E. «Istorizm», «problema istorizma», «krizis istorizma»: fenomen istorizma i ponyatie istorizm v nemetskikh naukakh o dukha XIX — nachala KhKh vv. // Novoe proshloe. The New Past. 2019. № 4. C. 87—105.

2. Asmolov A. G. Psikhologiya sovremennosti: vyzovy neopredelennosti, slozhnosti i raznoobraziya [II priglashegie k dialogu] // Mobilis in mobili. Lichnost' v ehpokhu peremen. Mezhdistsiplinarnyj proekt Aleksandra Asmolova / pod red. A. G. Asmolova. M.: YaSK, 2018. S. 13—29.

3. Assman A. Novoe nedovol'stvo memorial'noj kul'turoj / per. s nem. B. Khlebnikova. M.: NLO, 2016.

4. Assman A. Raspalas' svyaz' vremen? Vzlet i padenie temporal'nogo rezhima Moderna / per. s nem. B. Khlebnikova. M.: NLO, 2017.

5. Bauman Z. Retrotopiya / per. s angl. V. L. Silaevoj. M.: VTsIOM, 2019.

6. Belyanskaya L. V. «Sobytie» i «diskurs» kak klyuchevye ponyatiya postmarksistskoj filosofii // Vestn. Volgogr. gos. un-ta. Ser. 7. Filosofiya. 2016. № 4. S. 164—170.

7. Buller A. Vvedenie v teoriyu istorii. Uchebnoe posobie. M.: Flinta; Nauka, 2013.

8. Verner M., Tsimmermann B. Posle komparativa: histoire croisée i vyzov refleksivnosti // Ab Imperio. 2007. № 2. S. 59—90.

9. Girts K. «Nasyschennoe opisanie»: v poiskakh interpretativnoj teorii kul'tury // Antologiya issledovanij kul'tury. Interpretatsii kul'tury / gl. red. S. Ya. Levit. 2-e izd. M.; SPb., 2006. S. 171—200.

10. Drojzen T. Istorika. Lektsii ob ehntsiklopedii. i metodologii istorii / per. s nem. M.: Vladimir Dal', 2004.

11. Dugin A. G. Konservativnaya paradigma i kritika progressa v teorii Pitirima Sorokina: aktual'nost' dlya sovremennoj Rossii // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 18. Sotsiologiya i politologiya. 2010. № 1. S. 22—30.

12. Ionov I. N. Mezhdu universalizmom i unikal'nost'yu: kul'tura, lichnost' i poznavatel'nye strategii istorika // Professiya — istorik (K yubileyu L. P. Repinoj) / otv. red. O. V. Vorob'eva. M.: Akvilon, 2017. S. 256—284.

13. Ionov I. N. Teoriya kul'turnogo transfera Mishelya Ehspanya i transdistsiplinarnyj analiz tsivilizatsionnykh predstavlenij // Obschestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 2020. № 1. S. 148—163.

14. Kozellek R. Mozhem li my rasporyazhat'sya istoriej? // Otechestvennye zapiski. 2004. № 5. S. 226—241.

15. Lezov S. V. Teologiya kul'tury Paulya Tillikha // Tillikh P. Izbrannoe. Teologiya kul'tury. M.: Yurist, 1995. S. 461—471.

16. Mankhejm K. Ideologiya i utopiya // Mankhejm K. Diagnoz nashego vremeni / per. s nem. M.: Yurist, 1994. S. 7—276.

17. Morozov V. E. Rossiya i drugie. Identichnost' i granitsy politicheskogo soobschestva. M.: NLO, 2009.

18. Nitsshe F. O pol'ze i vrede istorii dlya zhizni / per. s nem. Ya. Bermana // Nitsshe F. Sochineniya v dvukh tomakh. T. 1. M.: Mysl', 1990. S. 158—230.

19. Popper K. R. Otkrytoe obschestvo i ego vragi. V 2 t. T. 2. Vremya lzheprorokov: Gegel', Marks i drugie orakuly / per. s angl. V. N. Sadovskogo. M.: Feniks, Kul'turnaya initsiativa, 1992.

20. Popper K. R. Predpolozheniya i oproverzheniya: Rost nauchnogo znaniya / per. s angl. A. L. Nikiforova, G. A. Novichkovoj. M.: ACT; Ermak, 2004.

21. Rozenfel'd L. Razvitie printsipa dopolnitel'nosti // Nil's Bor. Zhizn' i tvorchestvo / pod red. B. G. Kuznetsova. M.: Nauka, 1967. S. 61—87.

22. Sorokin P. Krizis nashego vremeni // Sorokin P. Chelovek. Tsivilizatsiya. Obschestvo (per. s angl.) / pod red. A. Yu. Sogomonova. M.: Politizdat, 1992. S. 427—504.

23. Sorokin P. Sotsial'naya i kul'turnaya dinamika: Issledovanie izmenenij v bol'shikh sistemakh iskusstva, istiny, ehtiki, prava, i obschestvennykh otnoshenij / per. s angl. SPb.: RKhGI, 2000.

24. Tillikh P. Kajros // Tillikh P. Izbrannoe. Teologiya kul'tury. M.: Yurist, 1995. S. 216—235.

25. Trel'ch Eh. Istorizm i ego problemy. Logicheskaya problema filosofii istorii / per. s nem. M.: Yurist, 1994.

26. Ehlias N. O protsesse tsivilizatsii. Sotsiogeneticheskie i psikhogeneticheskie issledovaniya / per. s nem. V 2 t. M.; SPb: Universitetskaya kniga, 2001. T. 1—2.

27. Axelrod R. The Structure of Decision: Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton University Press, 1976.

28. Bauman Z. Liquid Times: Living in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007.

29. Blanke H. W. Historiographiegeschichte als Historik. Stuttgart; Bad Cannstadt, 1991. 809 S.

30. Civilisation and Informalisation Connecting Long-Term Social and Psychic Processes / eds. C. Wouters, M. Dunning. N. Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. XXI.

31. Hazard P. La pensée européenne au XVIII sciècle: De Montesqieu à Lessing. P.: Librairie Artheme Fayard, 1963.

32. Kilminster R. Informalisation, Sociological Theory and Social Diagnosis // Civilisation and Informalisation Connecting Long-Term Social and Psychic Processes / eds. C. Wouters, M. Dunning. N. Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. R. 315—346.

33. Kilminster R. The Sociological Revolution: From the Enlightenment to the Global Age. L.: Routledge, 1998. XIV.

34. Koselleck R. Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time / tr. by K. Tribe. N. Y.: Columbia University Press, 2004.

35. Laclau E., Mouffe Sh. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. L., N. Y.: Verso, 2001.

36. Lee R. L. Bauman’s “Liquid Modernity” and Dilemmas of Development // Thesis Eleven. № 83. November 2005. P. 61—77.

37. Riesman D., Glazer N., Denny R. The Lonely Crowd. The Study of the Changing American Character. Abridged Edition with a 1969 Preface. New Haven, L.: Yale University Press, 2001.

38. Rückert H. Lehrbuch der Weltgeschichte in Organischer Darstellung. In 2 Bde. Leipzig: Weigel, 1857. Bd. 1. VIII; Bd. 2. IV.

39. Wouters C. Civilisation and Informalisation: The Book. Six Chapters by Cas Wouters // Civilisation and Informalisation Connecting Long-Term Social and Psychic Processes / eds. C. Wouters, M. Dunning. N. Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. R. 1—184.