Myths and Reality of Collective Memory
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Myths and Reality of Collective Memory
Annotation
PII
S207987840012283-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Margarita Sukhanova 
Affiliation: State Academic University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

Collective memory is an essential element of public consciousness, shaping the attitude to the past. The narratives of collective memory are created under the influence of a number of factors: socio-political context, information flows, group communication, individual experiences. Political actors compete in the struggle for collective memory, conduct commemoration: select episodes, reconstruct the past, create simplified mythological images of events. Commemoration is always a political process, based on ideological principles that serve to legitimize the political regime. Conductors of commemoration are mnemonic actors who compete among themselves and use various channels of public communication. A special role in the formation of the trace in the memory belongs to the media, the information flows produced by them. The information impact is primarily on the surface level of public consciousness, the communicative layer of memory, forms new mythological images. The narratives of the cultural layer of memory, the value level of consciousness are much more stable and resistant to the effects of mnemonic actors.

Keywords
historical memory, collective memory, commemoration, mnemonic actors, historical narratives of memory, mythologization, measurements of memory, communicative layer of memory, levels of public consciousness, value level
Источник финансирования
The research was carried out at the expense of Russian Science Foundation (project №19-18-00371).
Received
01.06.2020
Publication date
15.10.2020
Number of characters
45878
Number of purchasers
27
Views
2123
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2020

References

1. Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobschestva. M., 2001.

2. Anikin D. Historical Myth as Subject “Memory Studies”: in Search of Research Methodology // ISTORIYA. 2018. Vol. 9. Issue 6. URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840002242-5-1 DOI: 10.18254/S0002242-5-1

3. Anikin D. A. Frontir i granitsa: prostranstvennaya metodologiya v sovremennykh memory-studies // Filosofiya i metodologiya istorii. Sbornik nauchnykh statej VI Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferentsii (Kolomna, 27—28 noyabrya 2015 g.). Kolomna, 2015. S. 8—16.

4. Anikin D. A., Bubnov A. Yu. Politika pamyati v setevom prostranstve: internet kak mediator pamyati // Voprosy politologii. 2020. T. 10. № 1 (53). S. 19—28.

5. Assman A. Dlinnaya ten' proshlogo. Memorial'naya kul'tura i istoricheskaya politika. M., 2014.

6. Volkov D. Upravlyaemaya pamyat': kak 1917 g. stal «slepym pyatnom» rossijskoj istorii // RBK Delovoe informatsionnoe agentstvo. 09.11.2017 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.rbc.ru/opinions/politics/09/11/2017/5a03f8b39a79470ce66f1a01 (data obrascheniya 05.05.2020).

7. Gigauri D. I., Gutorov V. A. Politicheskij mif v strukture istoricheskoj pamyati // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 12: Politicheskie nauki. 2017. № 2. S. 24—45.

8. Golovashina O. V. Politika pamyati v usloviyakh «vremeni Mebiusa» // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2017. № 38. S. 63—70.

9. Golovashina O. V., Anikin D. A. Neozhidannye izderzhki pobedy: 4 noyabrya v kontekste politiki pamyati i massovogo istoricheskogo soznaniya // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2018. № 429. S. 66—73.

10. Zerubavel' Ya. Dinamika kollektivnoj pamyati // Imperiya i natsiya v zerkale istoricheskoj pamyati. M., 2011 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://litra.pro/imperiya-i-naciya-v-zerkale-istoricheskoj-pamyati-sbornik-statej/semenov-aleksandr/read (data obrascheniya: 05.05.2020).

11. Itogi revolyutsii // Fond Obschestvennoe mnenie. 17.11.2017 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://fom.ru/Proshloe/13855 (data obrascheniya 05.05.2020).

12. Kakie daty rossijskoj istorii my schitaem vazhnejshimi? I kakie — znaem? 28.12.2014 // Fond Obschestvennoe mnenie [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://fom.ru/Proshloe/11896 (data obrascheniya: 05.05.2020).

13. Kapustin B. G. «O ponyatii «revolyutsiya» // Revolyutsiya kak kontsept i sobytie / red. A. A. Vartumyan, S. G. Il'inskaya, M. M. Fedorova. M., 2015. S. 6—31.

14. Malinova O. Yu. Kommemoratsiya stoletiya revolyutsii(j) 1917 g. v RF: analiz strategij klyuchevykh mnemonicheskikh aktorov // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2018. № 1. S. 9—25.

15. Malinova O. Yu. «Oktyabr'skij perevorot» ili «Velikaya rossijskaya revolyutsiya». Pereosmyslenie «mifa osnovaniya» SSSR v politicheskom diskurse postsovetskoj Rossii // Revolyutsiya kak kontsept i sobytie / red. A. A. Vartumyan, S. G. Il'inskaya, M. M. Fedorova. M., 2015. S. 152—173.

16. Malinova O. Yu. Kommemoratsiya istoricheskikh sobytij kak instrument simvolicheskoj politiki: vozmozhnosti sravnitel'nogo analiza // Politiya. № 4. 2017. S. 6—22.

17. Malinova O. Yu. Velikaya otechestvennaya vojna kak simvolicheskij resurs: ehvolyutsiya otobrazheniya v ofitsial'noj ritorike 2000—2010 gg. // Rossiya i sovremennyj mir. 2015. № 2 (87). S. 6—29.

18. Malinova O. Yu. Konsolidatsiya politicheskikh soobschestv i problema «neudobnogo proshlogo»: opyt Evropy i Azii. (Referativnyj obzor) // Metod: Moskovskij ezhegodnik trudov iz obschestvennykh distsiplin. 2010. № 1. S. 99—108.

19. Nora P. Problematika mest pamyati // Frantsiya-pamyat' / pod red. P. Nora. SPb., 1999. S. 17—50.

20. Oktyabr'skaya revolyutsiya. 05.04.2017 // Analiticheskij tsentr Yu. Levady [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2017/04/05/oktyabrskaya-revolyutsiya-2/ (data obrascheniya: 05.05.2020).

21. Oktyabr'skaya revolyutsiya: velikaya i uzhasnaya? // Analiticheskij tsentr Yu. Levady. 01.11.2010 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2011/11/02/oktyabrskaya-revolyutsiya-prichiny-i-posledstviya/ (data obrascheniya: 05.05.2020).

22. Oktyabr'skaya revolyutsiya: prichiny i posledstviya // Analiticheskij tsentr Yu. Levady. 02.11.2011 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.levada.ru/2011/11/02/oktyabrskaya-revolyutsiya-prichiny-i-posledstviya/ (data obrascheniya: 05.05.2020).

23. Pamyat' o Staline: za i protiv // Vserossijskij tsentr obschestvennogo mneniya (VTsIOM) [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=116323 (data obrascheniya: 05.05.2020).

24. Revolyutsiya: 1917—2017. Peremeny vs stabil'nost' // Vserossijskij tsentr obschestvennogo mneniya (VTsIOM) [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://wciom.ru/fileadmin/file/reports_conferences/2017/2017-10-11_oct100.pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.05.2020).

25. Revolyutsiya kak pamyatnaya data // Fond Obschestvennoe mnenie [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://fom.ru/Proshloe/13856 (data obrascheniya: 05.05.2020).

26. Sukhanova M. I. Kontseptsiya struktury obschestvennogo soznaniya kak instrument analiza massovogo politicheskogo soznaniya // Politicheskaya nauka. 2017. № 1. S. 38—58.

27. Stoletie revolyutsii // Fond Obschestvennoe mnenie. 05.11.2017 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://fom.ru/Proshloe/13829 (data obrascheniya: 05.05.2020).

28. Trufanova E. O. Informatsionnoe perenasyschenie: klyuchevye problemy // Filosofskie problemy informatsionnykh tekhnologij i kiberprostranstva. 2019. T. 16. № 1. S. 4—21.

29. Fedorova M. M. Revolyutsiya i Istoriya (Revolyutsiya v kontekste vremeni Istorii i vremeni Politiki) // Revolyutsiya kak kontsept i sobytie / red. A. A. Vartumyan, S. G. Il'inskaya, M. M. Fedorova. M., 2015. S. 80—96.

30. Fedorova M. M. Istoriya/pamyat': «trudnaya» dilemma // Istoriya filosofii. 2018. T. 23. № 1. S. 108—121.

31. Fedorova M. M. Sobytie: sovremennye podkhody k formirovaniyu ponyatiya // Voprosy filosofii. 2019. № 6. S. 40—49.

32. Khal'bvaks M. Kollektivnaya i istoricheskaya pamyat' // Neprikosnovennyj zapas. 2005. № 2-3. S. 8—27.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate