Везде
Conciliarism in Theory and Practice of Legal Institutions and Administration in England in the 11th — 16th Centuries
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Conciliarism in Theory and Practice of Legal Institutions and Administration in England in the 11th — 16th Centuries
Annotation
PII
S207987840011638-0-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840011638-0
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Anastasia Palamarchuk 
Affiliation: Saint Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
Edition
Volume 11 Issue 10 (96)
Abstract

The Definition of «Etat Moderne» as a process of legitimation and implementation of emerging changes in practice of central and local administrative structures is taken as a conceptual basis of the present article. The history of multiple сonciliar institutions in England in the 11th — 16th centuries vividly illustrates this process and presents peculiar features of Etat Moderne: depersonalization of actors, bureaucratization and prior formalization of institutional activities; and, finally, contractualization (emrgence of councils as places of negotiating corporate contracts). The article considers several historical forms of conciliar institutions and their influence on developing group and corporate identities.

Keywords
Conciliarism, council, Etat Moderne, administration, monarchy, England
Received
28.04.2020
Publication date
31.10.2020
Number of characters
27725
Number of purchasers
22
Views
1902
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
200 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2020
Subscription benefits
5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Malinin Yu. P. Srednevekovyj «dukh soveta» // Odissej. Chelovek v istorii. 1992. M., 1994. S. 176—192.

2. Palamarchuk A. English Civilians and the Concept of Absolute Power // ISTORIYA. 2016. Vol. 7. Issue 2. URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840001413-3-1

3. Palamarchuk A. A. Tsivil'noe pravo v rannestyuartovskoj Anglii: instituty i idei. Diss. … d. i. n. M., 2016.

4. Palamarchuk A. A. Zemlya ili yurisdiktsiya? Problemy natsional'nogo v polemike o sude Admiraltejstva v rannestyuartovskoj Anglii // Natsii i ehtnichnost' v gumanitarnykh naukakh / pod red. A. Kh. Daudova i S. E Fedorova. SPb., 2015. C. 209—219.

5. Palamarchuk A. A. Ponyat' «Tolkovatelya»: delo Dzhona Kouehlla i polemika o yurisdiktsii tserkovnykh sudov v rannestyuartovskoj Anglii // Srednie veka. 2015. Vyp. 76 (3-4). S. 101—121.

6. Fedorov S. E. Imperskaya ideya i monarkhii k iskhodu srednikh vekov // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Istoriya. 2013. № 1. S. 77—89.

7. Fedorov S. E. Universalizm vs ehtnotsentrizm: imperiya i monarkhii k iskhodu srednikh vekov // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenij. Pravovedenie. 2012. № 6 (305). C. 176—189.

8. Foma Akvinskij. Summa Teologii. Chast' II—II. Voprosy 47—122 / per. S. I. Eremeeva. Kiev, 2013.

9. Khachaturyan N. A. Politicheskaya i gosudarstvennaya istoriya zapadnogo Srednevekov'ya v kontekste strukturnogo analiza // Srednie veka. M., 1992. Vyp. 54. S. 5—22.

10. Khachaturyan N. A. Ehvolyutsiya gosudarstva v srednevekovoj Evrope s drevnejshikh vremen do kontsa XV v. // Istoriya Evropy. M., 1992. T. 2. S. 487—508.

11. Khachaturyan N. The Phenomenon of Property in Metaphysical Characteristics of History and the Medieval World // ISTORIYA. 2017. Vol. 8. Issue 8. URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840002002-1-2/ DOI: 10.18254/S0002002-1-2

12. A Collection of Ordinances and Regulations for the Government of the Royal Household. L., 1790.

13. Adams G. B. Council and Courts in Anglo-Norman England. New Haven, 1925.

14. Baldwin J. F. The King’s Council in England During the Middle Ages. Oxford, 1969.

15. Bartlett R. England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings, 1075—1225. Oxford, 2000.

16. Bates D. The Normans and Empire. The Ford Lectures Delivered in the University of Oxford during Hilary Term 2010. Oxford, 2013.

17. Canning J. P. Ideas of State in Thirteenth and Fourteenth-century Commentators of the Roman Law // Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. 1983. Vol. 33. P. 1—27.

18. Cross K. Heirs of the Vikings: History and Identity in Normandy and England, c. 950 — c. 1015. York, 2018.

19. Fortescue J. The Government of England / ed. by Ch. Plummer. Oxford, 1885.

20. Fyodorov S. E., Kliuchko B. I. Soup d’Etat at the Age of Formation of the Early Modern State // Vestnik Sankt-Petersburgskogo Universiteta. History. 2018. Vol. 63. № 3. P. 898—907.

21. Holmes P. J. The Great Council in the Reign of Henry VII // The English Historical Review. Vol. 101. No. 401. 1986. P. 840—862.

22. Holmes P. J. The Last Tudor Great Councils // The Historical Journal. Vol. 33. No. 1. 1990. P. 1—22.

23. Hurstfield J. The Revival of Feudalism in Early Tudor England // History. New Series. 1952. Vol. 3. № 130. P. 131—145.

24. Kirshner J. Civitas Sibi Faciat Civem: Bartolus of Sassoferrato’s Doctrine on the making of a Citizen // Speculum. 1973. Vol. 48. No. 4. P. 694—713.

25. Le Patourel J. Norman Barons // Feudal Empires. Norman and Plantagenet / ed. by M. Jones. L., 1984. P. VI. P. 3—32.

26. Maddicott J. R. The Origins of the English Parliament, 924—1327. Oxford, 2010.

27. McNair F. The politics of being Norman in the reign of Richard the Fearless, Duke of Normandy (r. 942 — 996) // Early Medieval Europe. 2015. No. 23(3). P. 308—328.

28. Palamarchuk A. A., Fadeyev I. A. Richard Hooker’s Doctrine of Royal Supremacy in the Church of England // Vestnik Sankt-Petersburgskogo Universiteta. History. 2018. Vol. 63. № 1. S. 158—173.

29. Peacey J. “By committinge of a bill the House allowed of the bodie thereof”: Tudor Parliamentary Legislative Commitees: Development, Purposes, Value and Problems, 1510—1601 // Parliament at Work. Parliamentary Committees, Political Power and Public Access in Early Modern England / ed. by C. R. Kyle and J. Peacey. Woodbridge, 2002. P. 25—42.

30. Quillet J. Community, counsel and representation // The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought. c. 350 — c. 1450 / ed. by J. H. Burns. Cambridge, 1988. P. 520—572.

31. Reid R. R. The King’s Council in the North. L., 1921.

32. Rose J. The Problem of Political Counsel in Medieval and Early Modern England and Scotland // The Politics of Counsel in England and Scotland 1286—1707 / ed. by J. Rose. Oxford, 2016. P. 1—44.

33. Skeel C. A. S. The Council in the Marches of Wales: a study in local government during the Sixteenth and Seventeenth centuries. L., 1904.

34. Sommerville J. Henry VII’s “Council Learned in the Law” // The English Historical Review. 1939. Vol. 54. No. 215. P. 427—442.

35. Sommerville J. The Duchy of Lancaster Council and Court of Duchy Chamber: The Alexander Prize Essay // Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. 1941. Vol. 23. P. 159—177.

36. Tierney B. A Conciliar Theory of the Thirteenth Century // The Catholic Historical Review. 1951. Vol. 36. No. 4. P. 415—440.

37. Tierney B. Religion, Law and the Growth of Constitutional Thought, 1150—1650. Cambridge, 2008. P. 54—71.

38. Writing the History of Parliament in Tudor and Early Stuart England / ed. by P. Cavill and A. Gajda. Manchester, 2018.

39. Youings J. A. The Council of the West // Transactions of the Royal Historical Society. 1960. Vol. 10. P. 41—59.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate