Custom as a Base of a Legal Precedent in the Process of the English Medieval Law’s Formation
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Custom as a Base of a Legal Precedent in the Process of the English Medieval Law’s Formation
Annotation
PII
S207987840011186-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Marina Vinokurova 
Affiliation: State Academic University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

The article deals with the problem of medieval custom as a legal and behavioral foundation in the process of precedent’s formation in the Common Law of England. Medieval custom is defined as a special algorithm of behavior based on a traditional character of its applying, which began its existence in “times out of mind” and had been living in the memory and everyday life of generations for a long period. Custom is also characterized as an invisible behavioral vector, legitimizing medieval everyday life. The most important features of the custom were as such: its immemorial character (origin from times out of mind), continuity of its support (often usage of the custom), its reliable character. Medieval custom might be considered as a base (a “nuclear”) of the very mechanism of a legal precedent’s formation; for the judges of an early (existing from 12th сentury) mobile royal courts with their system of writs had to rely on the local custom as the only reliable rule of behavior and legal traditions of a place. Legal custom was one of the most important sources of the Common Law of England. For instance, it is shown in the article, that royal power used and corrected so called the custom of “infangthief” (a word of Anglo-Saxon origin; means hanging a felon or a thief on the place of their crimes) connected with private seigniorial jurisdiction, and in the form of the royal Statute “Quo Warranto” (1290) transformed it in the instrument of the inquisition of the problems connected with the definition of property rights.

Keywords
Medieval custom, customary law, precedent, Common Law of England, infangthief, Statute “Quo Warranto”
Received
22.06.2020
Publication date
31.10.2020
Number of characters
29073
Number of purchasers
21
Views
2062
Readers community rating
5.0 (1 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2020

References

1. Baranov V. F. Vozniknovenie i razvitie anglijskogo obschego prava v XII—XVII vv.: avtoreferat dis. … k. yu. n. M., 2012.

2. Popova G., Togoeva O. The Dichotomy of the Concepts “Norm” and “Practice” in Medieval Law // ISTORIYA. 2017. Vol. 8. Issue 6. URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840001918-8-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S0001918-8-1

3. Khatunov S. Yu. Istochniki ugolovnogo prava feodal'noj Anglii. Stavropol', 1996.

4. Khrestomatiya pamyatnikov feodal'nogo gosudarstva i prava stran Evropy. M., 1961.

5. Borough Customs / ed. by M. Bateson. In 2 vol. Selden Society. Vol. 18, 21. L., 1904—1906.

6. Bracton’s Note Book. L., 1887.

7. Bracton H. On the Laws and Customs of England. Cambridge, 1968.

8. Maitland F. W. Mary Bateson // The Collected Papers of Frideric William Maitland / ed. by H. A. L. Fisher. Cambridge, 1911. Vol. 3.

9. Maitland F. W. Constitutional History of England: A Course of Lectures. Cambridge, 1908.

10. Pollock F., Maitland F. The History of English Law before the Time of Edward I. In 2 vols. Cambridge, 1895.

11. Stephen L. F. A History of the Criminal Law of England. L., 1996.

12. The Treatise on the Laws and Customs of the Realm of England Commonly called Glanville. Oxford, 1998.

Comments

Write a review
Translate