Development of the German National Idea in 1908—1909
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Development of the German National Idea in 1908—1909
Annotation
PII
S207987840010961-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Alexey Sindeev 
Affiliation: Institute of Europe RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

The end of the 19th — early 20th Century is the time of the growing up of the German Reich. That is the time when the German Reich entered into competition with the other states and nations. This is also the time when one tried to find the basis for the ongoing development of the national idea. In the author's opinion, the sustainable functioning of a state is linked to the existence of the mechanisms of content filling and the reproduction of the national idea. Sustainability also depends on adapting these mechanisms to solve current problems and overcoming current difficulties. Since the author places particular emphasis on historical factors and the work of the elites when interpreting the national idea, the dispute about the national idea as an outdated phenomenon can be disregarded. The chronological framework can be explained for four reasons. At that time, Kaiser Wilhelm II became completely familiar with the power and its possibilities: Chancellors were changed, important political decisions were made. The party political system, as is emphasized again and again in historiography, had advanced intensively on the “way to the national state”. Two events (the “Daily Telegraph” affair and the crisis over Bosnia and Herzegovina came together, so that some contemporaries, fascinated by the reaction, thought they were watching the awakening of the German Empire. The conference in The Hague was concluded in 1907. The participating States missed the opportunity to regulate cooperation between the major states on the basis of multilateralism and international law. The events of the two years 1908 and 1909 clearly show how and in which direction domestic and foreign policy parts of the national idea could have been changed. After C. Clark [Clark. 2008] the author of the paper submitted his hypothesis about “the normality of the German Empire”. Alternatives in the country's development were highlighted. The paper has a discussion character. Because of the dissatisfaction with the Vatican in 1910, the question of confessions in the German Reich was not mentioned.

Keywords
German Empire, German national idea, Wilhelm II, Bülow, Bethmann-Hollweg, Reichstag, Bosnian crisis
Received
29.05.2020
Publication date
14.09.2020
Number of characters
36157
Number of purchasers
27
Views
1613
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2020

References

1. Veber M. K politicheskoj kritike chinovnichestva i partijnoj zhizni // Politicheskie raboty (1895—1919). M., 2003. S. 107—299.

2. Kagarlitskij B. Yu. Ot imperij — k imperializmu: Gosudarstvo i vozniknovenie burzhuaznoj tsivilizatsii. M., 2010.

3. Le Goff Zh. Istoriya i pamyat' (Histoire et mémoire). M., 2013.

4. Subbotin O. G. Ot triumfa k katastrofe: nemetskaya vneshnyaya politika 1871—1945 gg. v istoricheskoj retrospektive // Istoricheskaya germanistika: aktual'nye problemy sovremennykh issledovanij: sb. nauchnykh statej i materialov / sost.: A. V. Kasovich, V. A. Kosmach, A. F. Velikij, I. I. Kovyako. Pskov, 2018. S. 193—202.

5. Rostislavleva N. V. Natsional'naya identichnost' nemtsev v fokuse naslediya Otto fon Bismarka // Dialog so vremenem. 2016. Vyp. 54. S. 336—349.

6. Tupolev B. M. Germanskij imperializm v bor'be za «mesto pod solntsem». M., 1991.

7. Tupolev B. M. Germanskaya politika na Balkanakh nakanune Pervoj mirovoj vojn // V «porokhovom pogrebe Evropy», 1878—1914: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya na Balkanakh / otv. red. V. I. Kosik. M., 2003. S. 265—296.

8. Khobsbaum Eh. Natsii i natsionalizm posle 1780 g. SPb., 1998.

9. Shul'tse Kh. Kratkaya istoriya Germanii. M., 2004.

10. Shumpeter J. Kapitalizm, sotsializm i demokratiya. M., 1995 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://schumpeter.ru/books/ (data obrascheniya: 22.04.2020).

11. Bade K.-J. Land oder Arbeit? Transnationale und interne Migration im deutschen Nordosten vor dem Ersten Weltkrieg: Habilitationsschrift, Erlangen-Nürnberg 1979 mit einem neuen Vorwort. Osnabrück, 2005.

12. Clark C. Preußen: Aufstieg und Niedergang, 1600—1947. München, 2008.

13. Fischer F. Bündnis der Eliten: Zur Kontinuität der Machtergreifung in Deutschland, 1871—1945. Düsseldorf, 1979.

14. Frauendienst W. Das Deutsche Reich von 1890 bis 1914 // Just L (Hg.). Handbuch der deutschen Geschichte. Bd. IV. Abschnitt 1. Lieferung 15a. Konstanz. S. 1—99.

15. Gerhardt B. Handbuch der deutschen Geschichte. Band III: Von der Französischen Revolution bis zum ersten Weltkrieg. Stuttgart, 1962.

16. Hildebrand K. Das vergangene Reich: deutsche Außenpolitik von Bismarck bis Hitler 1871—1945. München, 2008.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate