The Napoleonic Era is the Focus of an Anthropological Approach. Reflections on New Books
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
The Napoleonic Era is the Focus of an Anthropological Approach. Reflections on New Books
Annotation
PII
S207987840009737-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Nikolay Promyslov 
Affiliation: State Academic University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

The anthropological approach of historiography is used today in the study of almost all periods of history. In research on the French Revolution and the Napoleonic wars, it has become virtually mainstream in recent decades. Historians of various countries are trying to find the “human dimension” of such, sometimes utterly inhumane events. The attention of researchers is drawn to the cultural and socio-cultural content of such aspects of wars and social conflicts as occupation, religious and linguistic politics, peoples' views of each other, as well as the impact of these views on real politics. However, all these new approaches to the study of history require researchers to have a good command of the old proven tools of source criticism.

Keywords
Napoleonic wars, an anthropological approach in historiography, the French history, image studies, language policy, Patriotic War of 1812
Received
17.01.2020
Publication date
12.06.2020
Number of characters
35939
Number of purchasers
36
Views
2233
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2020

References

1. Adadurov V. V. Kontakty mezhdu voennosluzhaschimi armii Napoleona i krest'yanami vo vremya russkoj kampanii // Frantsuzskij ezhegodnik 2018: Mezhkul'turnye kontakty v period inostrannoj okkupatsii. M., 2018. C. 141—164.

2. Adadurov V. Vojna tsivilizatsij. Sotsiokul'turnaya istoriya russkogo pokhoda Napoleona. T. 1. Kiev, 2017.

3. Vul'f L. Izobretaya Vostochnuyu Evropu: karta tsivilizatsii v soznanii ehpokhi Prosvescheniya. M., 2003.

4. Gladyshev A. V. Antropologicheskij povorot v voennoj istorii // Dialog so vremenem. 2017. Vyp. 59. S. 136—150.

5. Gorshkov D. I. Raport polkovnika Eh.-F.-R. Pushelona o srazhenii pri Moskve-reke, 5—7 sentyabrya 1812 g. // Lokus: lyudi, obschestvo, kul'tury, smysly. 2020. № 1. S. 149—163.

6. Zemtsov V. N. Vil'no v 1812 g.: zhizn' pri Napoleone (sotsiokul'turnyj kontekst) // Frantsuzskij ezhegodnik 2018: Mezhkul'turnye kontakty v period inostrannoj okkupatsii. M., 2018. C. 116—140.

7. Zemtsov V. N. Mikroistoriya i perspektivy izucheniya Otechestvennoj vojny 1812 g. // Trudy Komi otdeleniya Akademii voenno-istoricheskikh nauk. 2012. Vyp. 8. S. 32—35.

8. Zemtsov V. N. Napoleon v Rossii: sotsiokul'turnaya istoriya vojny i okkupatsii. M., 2018.

9. Kosykh T. A. Britanskij vzglyad na frantsuzskuyu okkupatsiyu Ispanii i Portugalii v 1807—1814 gg. // Frantsuzskij ezhegodnik 2019: Ehpokha Napoleona i pamyat' o nej. M., 2019. C. 203—216.

10. Leont'eva O. B. Antropologicheskij povorot v sovremennoj istoriografii Pervoj mirovoj vojny // KhKh v. i Rossiya: obschestvo, reformy, revolyutsii. Ehlektronnyj sbornik. 2017. № 5. S. 248—256 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://sbornik.libsmr.ru/content/files/catalog1/sb20rus_05_0.pdf (data obrascheniya: 16.05.2020).

11. Mitrofanov A. A., Promyslov N. V., Prusskaya E. A. Rossiya vo frantsuzskoj presse perioda Revolyutsii i Napoleonovskikh vojn (1789—1814 gg.). M., 2019.

12. Promyslov N. V. Vojna 1812 g. v pis'makh frantsuzskikh soldat // Frantsuzskij ezhegodnik 2006: Napoleon i ego vremya. K 100-letiyu A. Z. Manfreda (1906—1976). M., 2006. C. 219—231.

13. Promyslov N. V. Otstuplenie Velikoj armii ot Moskvy do Smolenska v pis'makh ee soldat // Frantsuzskij ezhegodnik 2010: Istochniki po istorii Frantsuzskoj revolyutsii XVIII v. i ehpokhi Napoleona. M., 2010. C. 312—328.

14. Promyslov N. V. «Sekretnoe oruzhie» bunta: podgotovka Napoleonom kampanii 1812 g. // Frantsuzskij ezhegodnik 2016: Protestnye dvizheniya v ehpokhu Frantsuzskoj revolyutsii i Pervoj imperii. M., 2016. C. 145—164.

15. Pugachauskas V. Litva v vojne 1812 g. // Rossiya i Baltiya Vyp. 7: Pamyatnye daty i istoricheskaya pamyat'. 2014. S. 50—63.

16. Rej M. Rossiya i russkie glazami plennykh frantsuzov v 1812 g.: komparativnoe issledovanie // Frantsuzskij ezhegodnik 2012: 200 let Otechestvennoj vojny 1812 g. M., 2012. S. 366—383.

17. Forrest A. Dostojnyj protivnik ili porochnyj dikar'? Vospriyatie vraga v ehpokhu Revolyutsii i Imperii // Frantsuzskij ezhegodnik 2012: 200 let Otechestvennoj vojny 1812 g. M., 2012. C. 206—222.

18. Chudinov A. V. S kem voeval russkij muzhik v 1812 g.? Obraz vraga v massovom soznanii // Frantsuzskij ezhegodnik 2012: 200 let Otechestvennoj vojny 1812 g. M., 2012. C. 336—365.

19. Callister Gr. War, Public Opinion and Policy in Britain, France and the Netherlands, 1785—1815. L., 2017.

20. McCain St. Language question under Napoleon. L., 2018.

21. Mémoires ou Souvenirs et anecdotes par M. le comte de Ségur. T. 3. Bruxelles, 1825.

22. Petiteau N. Écrire la mémoire. Les mémorialistes de la Révolution et de l’Empire. P., 2012.

23. Petiteau N. Guerriers du Premier Empire. Expérience et mémoires. P., 2011.

24. Segur Ph. P. Histoire de Napoléon et de la Grande Armée, pendant l’année 1812. P., 1824. 2 vol.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate