Stadial Classification of Historical Types of Political Culture, According to the System-Communication Approach

Alikberov, Alikber K.

doi:10.18254/S207987840006710-0

Home>Issue 7 (81)>Stadial Classification of Historical Types of Political Culture, According to the System-Communication Approach

Stadial Classification of Historical Types of Political Culture, According to the System-Communication Approach

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

Stadial Classification of Historical Types of Political Culture, According to the System-Communication Approach

Annotation

PII

S207987840006710-0-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840006710-0

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Alikber K. Alikberov Send message

ORCID: 0000-0002-2894-2767

Affiliation: Institute of Oriental Studies RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Edition

Volume 10 Issue 7 (81)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the classification of historical types of political culture in the framework of a new system-communication approach, taking into account their staged gradation from archaic tribal forms to complex civil and cosmopolitan forms. The author contrasts the new emerging communicative approach with the functional approach, which G. Almond and S. Verba used to study this topic, and opposes the idealization of some models (in this case, Western ones) to the detriment of others and opposing different cultures to each other. Instead of the triad of Almond and Verba (parish, citizenry and activist), the author identifies 6 types of political culture in history: 1) patriarchal (“potestar”), 2) tribal (“leader”), 3) fellow-country (“parochial”), 4) subservient (“monarchical”), 5) civil and 6) cosmopolitan.

Keywords

political culture, system-communication approach, functional approach, G. Almond, S. Verba

Received

25.04.2019

Publication date

16.09.2019

Number of characters

25813

Number of purchasers

Views

2025

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Alikberov A. Stadial Classification of Historical Types of Political Culture, According to the System-Communication Approach // ISTORIYA. – 2019. – V. 10. – Issue 7 (81). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840006710-0-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840006710-0
MLA	Alikberov, Alikber K "Stadial Classification of Historical Types of Political Culture, According to the System-Communication Approach." ISTORIYA. 10.7 (81) (2019). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840006710-0
APA	Alikberov A. (2019). Stadial Classification of Historical Types of Political Culture, According to the System-Communication Approach. ISTORIYA. vol. 10, no. 7 (81) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840006710-0

Full text is available to subscribers only

Subscribe right now

Only article and additional services

Subscription benefits

200 RUB / 1.0 SU

Whole issue and additional services

Subscription benefits

1000 RUB / 10.0 SU

All issues and additional services for 2019

Subscription benefits

2500 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Alikberov A. K. Sistemnaya logika kak instrument sistemnogo podkhoda k istorii // Voprosy filosofii. 2018. № 2. S. 15—25.

2. Almond G., Verba S. Grazhdanskaya kul'tura i stabil'nost' demokratii // Polis. 1992. № 4.

3. Vladimirskij-Budanov M. F. Obzor istorii russkogo prava. C. 283—284.

4. Kadyrov Sh. Kh. «Natsiya» plemen: ehtnicheskie istoki, transformatsiya, perspektivy gosudarstvennosti v Turkmenistane. Lipetsk, 2003.

5. Korotaev A. V. Ot vozhdestva k plemeni? Nekotorye tendentsii ehvolyutsii politicheskikh sistem Severo-Vostochnogo Jemena za poslednie 2 tysyachi let // Ehtnograficheskoe obozrenie. 1996. № 2. C. 81—91.

6. Nadezhdin N. Ya. Mustafa Kemal' Atatyurk: «Otets natsii»: biograficheskie rasskazy. M., 2011.

7. Almond G. A., Verba S. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in five Nations. Princeton, 1963.

8. Bebenburg von ‎Pitt. Thieme M. Deutschland ohne Ausländer: Ein Szenario. München, 2012.

9. Bowden B. Nationalism and Cosmopoitanism: Irreconcilable Differences or Possible Bedfellows? // National Identities. 2003. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 235—249.

10. Carneiro R. L. The Chiefdom: Precursor of the State.

11. Palmer R. E. A. The Archaic Community of the Romans.

12. Schellhammer K. Familienrecht nach Anspruchsgrundlagen: samt Verfahren in Familien-, Kindschafts- und Betreuungssachen. C. F. Müller. 2006.

13. Verba S. Comparative Political Culture. Princeton, 1965.

14. Yow C. H. Ethnic Chinese in Malaysian Citizenship: Gridlocked in Historical Formation and Political Hierarchy // Asian Ethnicity. Vol. 18. 2017. Issue 3. P. 277—295.