Везде
Ural-Volga Region Model of Integration into the Russian Imperial Space
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Ural-Volga Region Model of Integration into the Russian Imperial Space
Annotation
PII
S207987840006069-4-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840006069-4
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Olga Senutkina 
Affiliation: Dobrolyubov Nizhny Novgorod Linguistics University
Address: Russian Federation, Nizny Novgorod
Julia Guseva
Affiliation: Moscow City University (Samara Branch)
Address: Russian Federation, Samara
Edition
Volume 10 Issue 8 (82)
Abstract

The objective of the article is to explore the specifics of the Ural-Volga region model of integration into the Russian imperial space. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to solve the following tasks: to determine the time frame of the process of this integration, to identify the characteristics of the Ural-Volga region model compared with other models, first of all, with Central Asia one, to find out the main mechanisms for consolidating the Ural-Volga region in the empire. The source database of the research is primarily administrative documentation (state office work) which ensures the success of entering the imperial space. To construct the Ural-Volga model of integration into the Russian imperial space, the authors of the article refer to recent methodological developments, which allow a deeper understanding of the specifics of this model at the time of its creation. The theoretical basis of the study was therefore the works of the conceptual nature of such authors as: A. V. Remnev, S. V. Lyubichankovsky, D. V. Vasiliev, R. Geraci, E. Said, V. Tolts, and others. Scientific novelty is determined by the formulation of the problem and the construction of an integration model based on modern methodological ideas of scholars. The studied methodological ideas allowed the authors to identify the place of the Ural-Volga region in the West-East dichotomy; to understand whether it is possible to designate the region in question as “periphery”, as “margin” in relation to the “center”; to incorporate the integration process of the Volga-Urals into the paradigm of Russian civilization. The authors came to understand that the integration processes during the creation of the Russian empire were largely determined by the image of the Ural-Volga region that was formed in the minds of the political and intellectual elite of Russian society in the changing conditions of social development. This image dictated more or less strict mechanisms of interaction between the center and periphery (the actions of the Novokreshchensky Office, tolerance towards non-Orthodox confessions, persecution of those suspected of pan-Islamism, etc.).

Keywords
Russian Empire, imperial space, Ural-Volga region, integration, acculturation
Received
31.05.2019
Publication date
15.10.2019
Number of characters
38408
Number of purchasers
94
Views
2341
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
200 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2019
Subscription benefits
2500 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Vasil'ev D. V., Lyubichankovskij S. V. Administrativnaya akkul'turatsiya korennogo naseleniya Turkestanskoj oblasti v rossijskom zakonodatel'stve 1865—1866 godov //Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4: Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2018. T. 23. № 6. S. 61—75.

2. Vasil'ev D. V., Lyubichankovskij S. V. Kazakhi i russkie: bytovaya akkul'turatsiya v XIX v. // Voprosy istorii. 2018. № 3. S. 151—165.

3. Vasil'ev D. V., Lyubichankovskij S. V. Russkaya vlast' v Turkestanskom krae: vizualizatsiya imperskogo prostranstva kak faktor akkul'turatsii // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya. 2018. № 54. S. 17—26.

4. Guseva Yu. N. Informatsiya ob informatorakh: kak i kem sobiralis' dannye o musul'manakh Rossijskoj imperii v nachale XX veka //Narody Povolzh'ya i Priural'ya mezhdu revolyutsiyami (1905—1917): sb. statej. Kazan', 2017. S. 476—493.

5. Guseva Yu. N. Obraz islamskogo modernizma i mekhanizmy ego formirovaniya: sbor svedenij o musul'manakh povolzhskikh gubernij v nachale XX veka // Narody Povolzh'ya i Priural'ya mezhdu revolyutsiyami (1905—1917): sb. statej. Kazan', 2017. S. 493—506.

6. Dzherasi R. Okno na Vostok: Imperiya, orientalizm, natsiya i religiya v Rossii / Robert P. Dzherasi; avtorizovannyj perevod s anglijskogo V. Goncharova. M., 2013. S. 417.

7. Ivlev O. Yu., Romanov Eh.V. Dostoinstva i nedostatki imperii [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dostoinstva-i-nedostatki-imperii; https://cyberleninka.ru/article/v/dostoinstva-i-nedostatki-imperii.

8. Kappeler A. Rossiya — mnogonatsional'naya imperiya: Vozniknovenie. Istoriya. Raspad / per. s nem.: S. Chervonnaya. M., 2000.

9. Krasheninnikov F. Imperiya kak proklyat'e [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://samlib.ru›d/dzhejms_b/1409200.shtml.

10. Musul'mane v novoj imperskoj istorii. Sb. statej / sost. V. O. Bobrovnikov, I. V. Gerasimov, S. V. Glebov, A. P. Kaplunovskij, M. B. Mogil'ner, A. M. Semenov. M., 2017.

11. Mchedlova M. M. Islam v rossijskoj tsivilizatsionnoj traditsii: edinstvo kul'turnogo polya i sovremennost' // Reformy obrazovaniya musul'man Evrazii ot Khusaina Faizkhanova do Ismaila Gasprinskogo: istoricheskij opyt i sovremennaya aktual'nost'. Materialy yubilejnoj Kh Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem «Faizkhanovskie chteniya». Ch. 2. Moskva, 12 dekabrya 2014 g. M., 2015. S. 48—60.

12. Nemtsev M. Yu. Istoriya sovladaniya s mnogoobraziem. Rets.: Novaya imperskaya istoriya Severnoj Evrazii. Chast' I: Konkuriruyuschie proekty samoorganizatsii: VII—XVII vv. / pod red. I. Gerasimova. Kazan', 2017.

13. Novaya imperskaya istoriya Severnoj Evrazii. Chast' II: Balansirovanie imperskoj situatsii: XVIII—XX vv. / pod red. I. Gerasimova. Kazan', 2017 // Istoricheskaya ehkspertiza. 2017. № 4. S. 283—293.

14. Remnev A. V. Geografiya vlasti i ee regional'naya istoricheskaya dinamika v Sibiri i na Dal'nem Vostoke Rossii (XIX — nachalo XX vv.) // Voprosy sotsial'noj istorii Rossii kontsa XVIII — nachala XX vv.: sb. nauch. trudov / pod red. V. N. Khudyakova. Omsk, 2004. S. 3—14.

15. Remnev A. V. Kolonizatsiya Aziatskoj Rossii: imperskie i natsional'nye stsenarii vtoroj poloviny XIX — nachala XX veka: monografiya / A. V. Remnev, N. G. Suvorova. Omsk, 2013. S. 7.

16. Said Eh. V. Orientalizm. Zapadnye kontseptsii Vostoka. SPb., 2016.

17. Senyutkin S. B. Istoriya tatar Nizhegorodskogo Povolzh'ya s poslednej treti XVI do nachala KhKh vv.(Istoricheskaya sud'ba misharej Nizhegorodskogo kraya). Monografiya. Nizhnij Novgorod, 2001.

18. Senyutkina O. N. Model' «Tsentr-periferiya» v metodologii gumanitarnogo znaniya // Istoriya i sovremennost'. RAN, Institut vostokovedeniya. 2013. № 1. S. 24—32.

19. Tol'ts V. «Sobstvennyj Vostok» Rossii: Politika identichnosti i vostokovedenie v pozdneimperskij i rannesovetskij period. M., 2013. S. 14.

20. Shepelyov L. E. Chinovnyj mir Rossii. XVIII — nachalo XX v. SPb., 1999. S. 5.

21. Rosenberg William G. The Problems of Imperial Russia // AB IMPERIO. 2005. № 3. P. 453.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate