Legal Institutional Framework of the Steppe Region during the Post-Reform Period: the History of Local Traditions, General Imperial Institutions and Legal Standards Engaging Together

Anisimova, Inna

doi:10.18254/S207987840006007-6

Home>Issue 8 (82)>Legal Institutional Framework of the Steppe Region during the Post-Reform Period: the History of Local Traditions, General Imperial Institutions and Legal Standards Engaging Together

Legal Institutional Framework of the Steppe Region during the Post-Reform Period: the History of Local Traditions, General Imperial Institutions and Legal Standards Engaging Together

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

Legal Institutional Framework of the Steppe Region during the Post-Reform Period: the History of Local Traditions, General Imperial Institutions and Legal Standards Engaging Together

Annotation

PII

S207987840006007-6-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840006007-6

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Inna Anisimova Send message

Affiliation: Аltay State University
Address: Russian Federation, Barnaul

Edition

Volume 10 Issue 8 (82)

Abstract

The article was based on a wide variety of archive documents and reports on a complex analysis of legal institutional system of Central Asian outskirts of the Russian Empire from 60s to 90s of the 19th century. An important phase of justice system modernisation was the 1864 reform. It was progressive and essentially changed all parts of the law system. However, areas like the Steppe region and Turkestan were left out deliberately. It was brought to light that during that period of time Russian government decided to keep all institutions of the traditional law (biy, adat), as well as the existing elements of pre-reform imperial justice system. Changing the framework was quite difficult due to the gradual import of the new elements of the imperial post-reform law. During the research it was established that the engagement inside of the system was contradictory and often mutually exclusive. We can see that the governmental hesitation to completely change system as the whole resulted in its dysfunctionality and inefficiency. The 1898 reform completed the establishment of the new court statutes of 1964 in the Steppe region and confirmed the existence of formal and informal institutions, which later would bring up the discussion of the problem until the end imperial period.

Keywords

the Russian Empire, the Steppe region, judicial reform, common law, modernisation

Received

05.06.2019

Publication date

15.10.2019

Number of characters

38349

Number of purchasers

Views

2138

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Anisimova I. Legal Institutional Framework of the Steppe Region during the Post-Reform Period: the History of Local Traditions, General Imperial Institutions and Legal Standards Engaging Together // ISTORIYA. – 2019. – V. 10. – Issue 8 (82). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840006007-6-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840006007-6
MLA	Anisimova, Inna "Legal Institutional Framework of the Steppe Region during the Post-Reform Period: the History of Local Traditions, General Imperial Institutions and Legal Standards Engaging Together." ISTORIYA. 10.8 (82) (2019). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840006007-6
APA	Anisimova I. (2019). Legal Institutional Framework of the Steppe Region during the Post-Reform Period: the History of Local Traditions, General Imperial Institutions and Legal Standards Engaging Together. ISTORIYA. vol. 10, no. 8 (82) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840006007-6

Full text is available to subscribers only

Subscribe right now

Only article and additional services

Subscription benefits

200 RUB / 1.0 SU

Whole issue and additional services

Subscription benefits

1000 RUB / 10.0 SU

All issues and additional services for 2019

Subscription benefits

2500 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Abdrakhmanova B. Istoriya Kazakhstana: vlast', sistema upravleniya, territorial'noe ustrojstvo v XIX v. Astana, 1998.

2. Anisimova I. V. Pozitsii tsentral'nykh i regional'nykh vlastej po voprosu o preobrazovanii traditsionnoj sudebnoj sistemy Turkestanskogo kraya i Stepnogo general-gubernatorstva v kontse XIX v. // Izvestiya Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013. № 4/1 (80). S. 102—106.

3. Vasil'ev D. V. Aberratsiya vzaimodejstviya: lozhno ponyatye smysly rossijsko-kazakhskikh realij XVIII v. // Ehlektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel'nyj zhurnal «Istoriya». 2019. Vypusk 1 (75). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840002320-1-1/

4. Vasil'ev D. V., Lyubichankovskij S. V. Administrativnaya akkul'turatsiya korennogo naseleniya Turkestanskoj oblasti v rossijskom zakonodatel'stve 1865—1866 godov // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 4. Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2018. T. 23. № 6. S. 61—75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu4.2018.6.4.

5. Vasil'ev D. V., Lyubichankovskij S. V. Kazakhi i russkie: bytovaya akkul'turatsiya v XIX v. // Voprosy istorii. 2018. № 3. S. 151—165.

6. Vilenskij B. V. Sudebnaya reforma i kontrreforma v Rossii. Saratov, 1969.

7. Glazunov D. A. Podgotovka sudebnoj reformy 1898 g. v Stepnom general-gubernatorstve // Sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie i ehtnokul'turnye protsessy v Verkhnem Priirtysh'e v XVII—XX vekakh. Novosibirsk, 2011. S. 163—169.

8. Derevskova V. M. Prostranstvenno-vremennye problemy realizatsii sudebnoj reformy 1864 g. // Sibirskij yuridicheskij vestnik. 2014. № 4. S. 21—28.

9. Zakharov V. V. Neoinstitutsionalizm v istoriko-pravovykh issledovaniyakh: k probleme rasshireniya metodologicheskogo instrumentariya otechestvennoj istorii gosudarstva i prava // Uchenye zapiski. Ehlektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2010. № 3 (15) [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.scientific-notes.ru/pdf/015-041.pdf .

10. Korotkikh M. G. Samoderzhavie i Sudebnaya reforma 1864 g. v Rossii. Voronezh, 1989.

11. Korotkikh M. G. Sudebnaya reforma v Rossii // Voprosy istorii. 1987. № 12. S. 20—34.

12. Kotyukova T. V. Poddannye ili grazhdane? Vybory v Turkestane: ot Imperii k Respublike // Ehlektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel'nyj zhurnal «Istoriya». 2018. Vypusk 8 (72). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840002486-3-1/.

13. Krakovskij K. P. Provedenie sudebnoj reformy 1864 g. v Rossii. Ch. 2 (posvyaschaetsya 150-letiyu sudebnoj reformy 1864 g.) // Severo-Kavkazskij yuridicheskij vestnik. 2014. № 4. S. 18—30.

14. Krakovskij K. P. Sudebnaya reforma 1864 g.: znachenie i istoriko-pravovye otsenki // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2014. № 12. S. 16—31.

15. Lyubichankovskij S. V. Politika akkul'turatsii v usloviyakh razrusheniya imperii: kazus volostnogo zemstva // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya. 2017. № 50. S.31—37.

16. Lysenko Yu. A. Vopros o voinskoj povinnosti dlya kazakhskogo naseleniya (70 e gg. XIX — nachalo KhKh v.) // Izvestiya Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 4-2. S. 158—162.

17. Nemytina M. V. Rossijskoe samoderzhavie i sudebnaya reforma 1864 g. // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2015. № 5. S. 92—98.

18. Nesterenko L. S. Rasprostranenie sudebnoj reformy 1864 g. v Turkestanskom krae // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye i yuridicheskie nauki: sovremennye trendy v izmenyayuschemsya mire. Krasnodar, 2012. S. 292—296.

19. Pochekaev R. Yu. Osnovnye ehtapy ehvolyutsii kazakhskogo suda biev (XV — nachalo KhKh vv. // Zanger. 2008. № 4 (81). Aprel'. S. 51—58.

20. Taranovski T. Sudebnaya reforma i razvitie politicheskoj kul'tury tsarskoj Rossii // Velikie reformy v Rossii. 1856—1874: Sbornik / pod red. L. G. Zakharovoj, B. Ehklofa, Dzh. Bushnella. M., 1992. S. 301—317.

21. Traditsionnoe kazakhskoe obschestvo v natsional'noj politike Rossijskoj imperii: kontseptual'nye osnovy i mekhanizmy realizatsii (XIX — nachalo XX v.) / otv. red. Yu. A. Lysenko. Barnaul, 2014.

22. Anisimova I. V., Gostyusheva E. M. The Imperial Judicial and Legal System in the Steppe Region in the second half of the XIX century: Features of Formation and Functioning // Bylye Gody. 2018. Vol. 47. Is. 1. R. 271—279.