Везде
History of the Global Climate Agenda and Its Future in the Eurasian Economic Union
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
History of the Global Climate Agenda and Its Future in the Eurasian Economic Union
Annotation
PII
S207987840031942-5-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840031942-5
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Madina Turaeva 
Affiliation: Institute of Economics RAS
Address: Russian Federation
Artyom Yakovlev
Affiliation:
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Institute of Economics RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Volume 15 Issue 6 (140)
Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the current climate agenda, the extent of its politicization and its impact on global economic development, as well as the future of its implementation in the Eurasian Economic Union. Currently, the global climate agenda, focused on reducing the anthropogenic factor and the energy transition, is becoming an instrument of economic policy. It is significantly affecting the development of both global and national economies, often to the detriment of industrial development and the slowdown of economic growth of some regions, with the undoubted benefit of climate agenda's promoters. At the same time, the review of a large number of researches from different fields of science in the article shows the ambiguity of the influence of anthropogenic factor on global warming, ocean acidification and other global changes in ecosystems. The article analyzes the points of the Concept for the Implementation of the Green Economy in the EAEU adopted in 2023 and the prospects for protecting the union space under the crisis of climate narratives. Despite the fact that all EAEU members are involved in the global climate agenda, a moderate strategy for its implementation, taking into account primarily the socio-economic interests of the member states and the integration union as a whole, seems appropriate.

Keywords
global climate agenda, Paris Agreement, sustainable development, EAEU, green economy, global warming, emissions, sanctions, energy transition, national economic sovereignty, climate capitalism, decoupling
Received
18.03.2024
Publication date
31.07.2024
Number of characters
52228
Number of purchasers
7
Views
192
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
200 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
820 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2024
Subscription benefits
5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Budyko M. I. Izbrannye raboty. SPb.: Amerit; Glavnaya geofizicheskaya observatoriya im. A. I. Voejkova, 2020.

2. V EAEhS prinyali kontseptsiyu vnedreniya printsipov zelenoj ehkonomiki / Otdel informatsionnogo obespecheniya Departamenta protokola i organizatsionnogo obespecheniya EEhK. 16 noyabrya 2023 g. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://eec.eaeunion.org/news/v-eaes-prinyali-kontseptsiyu-vnedreniya-printsipov-zelenoy-ekonomiki (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

3. Volosatova A. A., Uchenov A. A., Skobelev D. O. Formirovanie kontseptsii vnedreniya printsipov zelenoj ehkonomiki v Evrazijskom ehkonomicheskom soyuze: rol' garmonizatsii podkhodov k povysheniyu resursnoj ehffektivnosti // Vestnik evrazijskoj nauki. 2022. T. 14. № 4. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://esj.today/PDF/23ECVN422.pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

4. Denisov S. N., Eliseev A. V., Mokhov I. I. Vklad estestvennykh i antropogennykh ehmissij CO2 i CH4 v atmosferu s territorii Rossii v global'nye izmeneniya klimata v XXI v. // Doklady Akademii nauk. 2019. T. 488. № 1. S. 74—80. DOI: 10.31857/S0869-5652488174-80

5. Zakon Kyrgyzskoj Respubliki «O ratifikatsii Parizhskogo soglasheniya po Ramochnoj konventsii Organizatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsij ob izmenenii klimata, podpisannogo 12 dekabrya 2015 g. v gorode Parizh».

6. Zakon Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 4 noyabrya 2016 g. № 20-VІ.

7. Kontorovich A. Eh. V blizhajshie 50 let nevozmozhno printsipial'no izmenit' ehnergeticheskij balans // Ukhtinskij gosudarstvennyj tekhnicheskij universitet. 01.12.2021. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://ugtu.rf/news/47299 (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

8. Kontseptsiya vnedreniya printsipov «zelenoj» ehkonomiki v Evrazijskom ehkonomicheskom soyuze // Departament makroehkonomicheskoj politiki EEhK. 2023. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://eec.eaeunion.org/upload/files/dep_makroec_pol/green_economy.pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

9. Koronovskij N. V. Global'noe poteplenie — mif ili real'nost'? // Fizika. Pervoe sentyabrya. 2014. № 11. S. 48—51.

10. Kryshev I. I., Ryazantsev E. P. Atomnaya ehnergetika i biosfera // Vestnik AN SSSR. 1991. № 2. S. 39—52.

11. MAGATEh. Vodookhlazhdaemye reaktory. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.iaea.org/ru/temy/vodoohlazhdaemye-reaktory (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

12. Malinin V. N. Vlagosoderzhanie atmosfery i parnikovyj ehffekt // Obschestvo. Sreda. Razvitie (Terra Humana). 2014. № 3 (32). S. 139—145.

13. Mishchenko Y. Challenges of the Global Transition to the Use of Clean Carbon-Free Energy for Russia in the 21st Century // ISTORIYA. 2022. Vol. 13. Issue 9 (119). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840022914-4-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840022914-4

14. Mokhov I. I. Geofizicheskaya termodinamika: osobennosti temperaturnoj stratifikatsii atmosfery v godovom khode // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 3: Fizika. Astronomiya. 2022. № 3. S. 58—63.

15. O mezhdunarodnom opyte razrabotki i vnedreniya printsipov, mer i mekhanizmov “zelenoj” ehkonomiki» (analiticheskij doklad) // Departament makroehkonomicheskoj politiki EEhK. 2022. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://eec.eaeunion.org/upload/medialibrary/b34/Doklad-zelenaya-ekonomika-06.2022.pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

16. O prinyatii Parizhskogo soglasheniya // Postanovlenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 21 sentyabrya 2019 g. № 1228.

17. Paramonova N. Istoriya «zelenykh» dvizhenij // Ehkologiya. 2020. № 6. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://atomicexpert.com/history_green_organizations (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

18. Parizhskoe soglashenie // OON. 12 dekabrya 2015 g. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf

19. Povestka dnya v oblasti ustojchivogo razvitiya // OON. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ru/about/development-agenda (data obrascheniya: 10.03.2024).

20. Podderzhka PROON v realizatsii 14-j tseli ustojchivogo razvitiya: upravlenie okeanami, moryami i morskimi resursami // PROON. 2016. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/SDG14_Oceans_RU%20-%20web.pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

21. Programma Organizatsii Ob'edinennykh Natsij po okruzhayuschej srede. Doklad o razryve v urovne vybrosov za 2022 god: Zakryvayuscheesya okno — Klimaticheskij krizis trebuet skorejshego preobrazovaniya obschestva — Rezyume dlya direktivnykh organov. Najrobi. 2022. S. 6—10. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2022 (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

22. Rekomendatsiya Kollegii Evrazijskoj ehkonomicheskoj komissii ot 14 noyabrya 2023 g. № 32 «O Kontseptsii vnedreniya printsipov “zelenoj” ehkonomiki v Evrazijskom ehkonomicheskom soyuze».

23. Reshenie Vysshego Evrazijskogo ehkonomicheskogo soveta ot 11 dekabrya 2020 g. № 12 «O Strategicheskikh napravleniyakh razvitiya evrazijskoj ehkonomicheskoj integratsii do 2025 goda».

24. Reshetnikov M. G. Klimaticheskaya politika v Rossii: nauka, tekhnologii, ehkonomika // Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2023. № 6 (201). S. 6—10.

25. Roginko S. A. Klimaticheskaya povestka v sovremennoj situatsii: sovety dlya ehkonomiki Rossii // Nauchnye trudy Vol'nogo ehkonomicheskogo obschestva Rossii. 2022. T. 236. № 4. S. 447—465.

26. Sorokhtin O. G. Prichiny izmeneniya global'nogo klimata zemli // Ehkologiya i promyshlennost' Rossii. 2008. № 4. S. 35—40.

27. Sorokhtin O. G. Chto zhe nam grozit: poteplenie ili pokholodanie klimata? // Izobretatel'stvo. 2011. T. 11. № 1. S. 9—25.

28. Turaeva M. O., Gorokhova I. V. Znachenie natsional'nykh interesov v transportnoj sfere dlya obespecheniya natsional'noj bezopasnosti Rossii // Federalizm. 2022. T. 27. № 3(107). S. 125—138.

29. Ukaz Prezidenta Respubliki Belarus' № 345 «O prinyatii mezhdunarodnogo dogovora».

30. Ahn J., Headly M., Wahlen M., Brook Ed. J., Mayewski P. A., Taylor K. C. CO2 diffusion in polar ice: observations from naturally formed CO2 spikes in the Siple Dome (Antarctica) ice core. Journal of Glaciology. 2008. Vol. 54. Is. 187. P. 685—695.

31. Akasofu S. On the recovery from the Little Ice Age. Natural Science. 2010. Vol. 2. P. 1211—1224.

32. Barbier E. How is the Global Green New Deal going? Nature. 2010. Vol. 464. P. 832—833.

33. Bian Q. H. Global Warming Thermodynamics // Open Access Library Journal. 2022. Vol. 9. P. 1—37.

34. Bowen A., Hepburn C. Green growth: an assessment // Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 2014. Vol. 30. Is. 3. P. 407—422.

35. Bucktowarsing A. The rise and fall of Carbon Markets: the other face of financial deregulation. 2011.

36. Caldeira K., Wickett M. Anthropogenic carbon and ocean pH // Nature. 2003. Vol. 425. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/425365a (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

37. Connell S. D., Leung J. Y. S. Reproducibility crisis and gravitation towards a consensus in ocean acidification research // Nat. Clim. Chang. 2023. Vol. 13. P. 1266—1271.

38. Cornwall Ch. E., Hurd C. L. Experimental design in ocean acidification research: problems and solutions // ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2016. Vol. 73. Is. 3. P. 572—581.

39. Cressey D. Crucial ocean-acidification models come up short. Nature. 2015. Vol. 524. P. 18—19.

40. Evans J. R. Improving photosynthesis. Plant Physiology. 2013. Vol. 162 (4). P. 1780—1793.

41. Geels F. W. From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy. 2004. Vol. 33. Is. 6—7. P. 897—920.

42. Gosselin P. Non-Existent Relationship… CO2-Temperature Correlation Only 15% of Last 165 Years. // NoTricksZone. 2016. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://notrickszone.com/2016/08/04/non-existent-relationship-co2-temperature-correlation-only-15-of-last-165-years (data obrascheniya: 03.05.2024).

43. Haberl H. et al. Environmental research letters. 2020. Vol. 15 (6). [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a/pdf (data obrascheniya: 03.05.2024).

44. Hawken P., Lovins A., Hunter Lovins L. Natural Capitalism. Little, Brown, 2000.

45. Hawken P., Lovins A., Hunter Lovins L. Öko-Kapitalismus. Random House Foreign Language Publishing. 2002.

46. Hickel J., Kallis G. Is green growth possible? // New Polit. Econ. 2020. Vol. 25 (4). P. 469—486.

47. Hope M. Climate capitalism // Nature Clim Change. 2016. Vol. 6. Is. 18. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2906 (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

48. Hunter Lovins L., Cohen B. Climate capitalism: capitalism in the age of climate change. N. Y.: Hill and Wang, 2011.

49. Indicators to Measure Decoupling of Environmental Pressure from Economic Growth. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.oecd.org/environment/indicators-modelling-outlooks/1933638.pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

50. IPCC, 2019: Summary for Policymakers // IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, M. Tignor, E. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Nicolai, A. Okem, J. Petzold, B. Rama, N. M. Weyer (eds.)]. 2019. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/4/2019/12/02_Summary-for-Policymakers_SPM.pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

51. IPCC, 2021: Summary for Policymakers // Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte V., P. Zhai A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M. I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J. B. R. Matthews, T. K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; N. Y., 2021.

52. IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; N. Y., 2022.

53. IPCC, 2022: Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [P. R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; N. Y., 2022.

54. Landscheidt T. New Little Ice Age Instead of Global Warming? Energy and Environment. 2003. Vol. 14. P. 327—350.

55. Lorenzen B. Earth’s Magnetic Field — The Key to Global Warming // Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection. 2019. Vol. 7. P. 25—38.

56. Malberg H. Von. Klimawandel seit der Kleinen Eiszeit: Die Wirkung der Sonne wurde unterschätzt. 12. Mai 2013 von Kalte Sonne. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://archiv.klimanachrichten.de/fakten-zum-klimawandel-seit-der-kleinen-eiszeit (data obrascheniya: 03.05.2024).

57. Mcelwain J. C., Mayle F. E., Beerling D. J. Stomatal evidence for a decline in atmospheric CO2 concentration during the Younger Dryas stadial: a comparison with Antarctic ice core records // J. Quaternary Sci. 2002. Vol. 17. P. 21—29.

58. Meadows D. H., Meadows D. L., Randers, J. Beyond the Limits: An Executive Summary // Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society. 1993. Vol. 13 (1). P. 3—14.

59. Meadows D., Randers J. The Limits to Growth: The 30-year Update (1st ed.). L.: Routledge. 2004.

60. Meadows D. H., Meadows D. L., Randers J., Behrens W. W. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. N. Y.: Universe Books, 1972.

61. Mörner N.-A. Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) or Natural Global Warming (NGM). Voice of the Publisher. 2018. Vol. 4. P. 51—59.

62. Nationally Determined Contribution of the Russian Federation as part of the Implementation of the Paris Agreement of December 12, 2015. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/NDC_RF_eng.pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

63. Nationally Determined Contributions Registry. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/Letter%20of%20the%20Minister%20of%20Environment.pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

64. Nduka A. The World Energy Challenge and Global Warming // Energy and Power Engineering. 2015. Vol. 7. P. 105—109.

65. Newell P., Paterson M. Climate capitalism: global warming and the transformation of the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2010.

66. OECD. Kurs na zelenyj rost. Rezyume dlya lits, prinimayuschikh resheniya. Maj 2011. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/48634082.pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

67. Richards R.A. Selectable traits to increase crop photosynthesis and yield of grain crops // Journal of Experimental Botany. 2000.Vol. 51. Iss.1. Pp. 447—458.

68. Ricke K. L., Caldeira K. Maximum warming occurs about one decade after a carbon dioxide emission // Environmental Research Letters. 2014. Vol. 9 (12). [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/9/12/124002/pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

69. Sapinski J. P. Climate capitalism and the global corporate elite network // Environmental Sociology. 2015. Vol. 1 (4). P. 268—279.

70. Sapinski J. P. Corporate Climate Policy-planning in the Global Polity: A Network Analysis // Critical Sociology. 2019. Vol. 45 (4-5). P. 565—582.

71. Seibel B. A., Walsh P. J. Potential Impacts of CO2 Injection on Deep-Sea Biota // Science. 2001. Vol. 294. P. 319—320.

72. Söderholm P. The green economy transition: the challenges of technological change for sustainability // Sustain Earth. 2020. Vol. 3, 6. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-020-00029-y (data obrascheniya: 03.05.2024).

73. The Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Belarus’ letter to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/Belarus_Letter.pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

74. Timm S. The impact of photorespiration on plant primary metabolism through metabolic and redox regulation // Biochem Soc Trans. 2020. Vol. 48(6). P. 2495—2504.

75. Tollefson J. Ocean acidification reversed on Great Barrier Reef // Nature. 2016. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2016.19410#citeas (data obrascheniya: 03.05.2024).

76. Updated Nationally Determined Contribution of the Kyrgyz Republic, 2021. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2022-06/%D0%9E%D0%9D%D0%A3%D0%92%20ENG%20%D0%BE%D1%82%2008102021.pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

77. Updated Nationally Determined Contribution of the Republic of Kazakhstan to the global response to climate change. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/NDC/2023-06/12updated%20NDC%20KAZ_Gov%20Decree313_19042023_en_cover%20page.pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

78. Vadén T., Lähde V., Majava A., Järvensivu P., Toivanen T., Hakala E., Eronen J. Decoupling for ecological sustainability: a categorisation and review of research literature // Environ. Sci. Pol., 2020. Vo. 112. P. 236—244.

79. Warlenius R. H. The limits to degrowth: Economic and climatic consequences of pessimist assumptions on decoupling. Ecological Economics. 2023. Vol. 213. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800923002008 (data obrascheniya: 03.05.2024).

80. Wiedenhofer D., Virág D., Kalt G., Plank B., Streeck J., Pichler M., ... & Haberl, H. A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part I: bibliometric and conceptual mapping // Environmental research letters. 2020. Vol. 15 (6). [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a/pdf (data obrascheniya: 03.05.2024).

81. World Bank. Inclusive Green Growth: The Pathway to Sustainable Development. Technical Report, World Bank. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications. 2012.

82. World Economic Forum. Fostering Effective Energy Transition: 2023 Edition. 28 June 2023. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Fostering_Effective_Energy_Transition_2023.pdf (data obrascheniya: 05.03.2024).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate