On the Question of the Legal Status of Mountainous Southwestern Taurika in the 6th — First Half of the 9th Century

Mogarichev, Yuriy

doi:10.18254/S207987840031188-5

Home>Issue 5 (139)>On the Question of the Legal Status of Mountainous Southwestern Taurika in the 6th — First Half of the 9th Century

On the Question of the Legal Status of Mountainous Southwestern Taurika in the 6th — First Half of the 9th Century

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

On the Question of the Legal Status of Mountainous Southwestern Taurika in the 6th — First Half of the 9th Century

Annotation

PII

S207987840031188-5-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840031188-5

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Yuriy Mogarichev Send message

Affiliation: Institute of Archaeology of Crimea RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Simferopol

Edition

Volume 15 Issue 5 (139)

Abstract

Issue of the legal status (state affiliation) of the mountainous Southwest Crimea is important for better understanding of political, ethnic and religious development of the region in early Middle Ages. The entire set of sources is evidence of its being controlled by the Byzantine Empire. But the issue of the exercise of power by the Romans, its form, as well as the period when the territory began its existence as “interior” part of Byzantine is still a matter of dispute. There are two chronological references. First, “The Buildings”, a treatise by Procopius of Caesarea, who mentioned in it the land of Dory between Chersoneses and Bosporus, whose inhabitants (Goths) had been allies of the Empire before the early 560s. Secondly, a number of sources inform that Byzantine authorities set up the theme of Cherson (Klimata) in the Crimea (about 841). The creation of the theme is certain evidence for incorporation of the former land of Dory (Klimata, Gothia) into the Byzantine Empire. In the author’s opinion, the set of the aforementioned sources has no evidence to conclude that the mountainous Southwest Crimea/Taurica had been a Byzantine “interior” territory before the creation of Klimata.

Keywords

Byzantium, Crimea, Taurika, Dory, Goths, Khazars

Received

07.03.2024

Publication date

15.07.2024

Number of characters

33827

Number of purchasers

Views

128

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Mogarichev Y. On the Question of the Legal Status of Mountainous Southwestern Taurika in the 6th — First Half of the 9th Century // ISTORIYA. – 2024. – V. 15. – Issue 5 (139). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840031188-5-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840031188-5
MLA	Mogarichev, Yuriy "On the Question of the Legal Status of Mountainous Southwestern Taurika in the 6th — First Half of the 9th Century." ISTORIYA. 15.5 (139) (2024). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840031188-5
APA	Mogarichev Y. (2024). On the Question of the Legal Status of Mountainous Southwestern Taurika in the 6th — First Half of the 9th Century. ISTORIYA. vol. 15, no. 5 (139) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840031188-5

Full text is available to subscribers only

Subscribe right now

Only article and additional services

Subscription benefits

200 RUB / 1.0 SU

Whole issue and additional services

Subscription benefits

820 RUB / 10.0 SU

All issues and additional services for 2024

Subscription benefits

5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Ajbabin A. I. Ehtnicheskaya istoriya rannevizantijskogo Kryma. Simferopol': Dar, 1999.

2. Ajbabin A. I. K diskussii ob ehpigraficheskikh svidetel'stvakh o deyatel'nosti Vizantii v gornom Krymu v VI v. // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 4: Istoriya. Regionovedenie. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2021. T. 26. № 6. S. 6—18.

3. Ajbabin A. I. Rannevizantijskij i khazarskij periody ehvolyutsii gorodov na Vnutrennej gryade Kryma // Materialy po arkheologii, istorii i ehtnografii Tavrii. Simferopol': Solo-Rich, 2021. Vyp. XXVI. S. 475—497.

4. Alekseenko N. A. Gotiya v strukture vizantijskoj administrativnoj sistemy v Tavrike vo vtoroj polovine Kh veka // Khersonesskij sbornik. Sevastopol', 1998. Vyp. IX. S. 230—236.

5. Alekseenko N. A. Vizantijskij Kherson VI—XIII stoletij v pamyatnikakh sfragistiki // Chinovniki Khersona VIII–XI vv. Sevastopol': Kolorit, 2017.

6. Alekseenko N. A. Sfragisticheskie istochniki vizantijskoj Tavriki: novye otkrytiya v sfere kontaktov s tsentral'noj administratsiej // Bosporskie issledovaniya. Kerch': Simferopol', 2022. Vyp. XLIV. S. 220—235.

7. Afinogenov D. E. Istochnik rasskaza o krymskikh sobytiyakh 705 i 711 gg. v «Khronografii» Feofana Ispovednika // Materialy po arkheologii, istorii i ehtnografii Tavrii. Simferopol', 2006. Vyp. XII. Ch. 2. S. 602—614.

8. Bajer Kh.-F. Istoriya Krymskikh gotov kak interpretatsiya Skazaniya Matfeya o gorode Feodoro. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural'skogo universiteta, 2001.

9. Bibikov M. V. Istoricheskaya komponenta vizantijskoj agiografii // Istoriya i arkhivy. M., 2021. № 3. S. 107—118.

10. Budanova V. P. Goty v ehpokhu Velikogo pereseleniya narodov. M., 1990.

11. Vinogradov A. Yu. Vizantijskie nadpisi // IOSPE³. 2015. T. V. V. 7. URL: https://iospe.kcl.ac.uk/5.7-ru.html (data obrascheniya: 09.03.2023).

12. Vinogradov A. Yu. Vizantijskie nadpisi. IOSPE³. 2015. T. V. V 330. URL: https://iospe.kcl.ac.uk/5.330-ru.html (data obrascheniya: 09.03.2023).

13. Gertsen A. G. Krepostnoj ansambl' Mangupa // Materialy po arkheologii, istorii i ehtnografii Tavrii. Simferopol', 1990. Vyp. 1. S. 88—166.

14. Gertsen A. G. Molivdovul iz mogil'nika Almalyk (Mangup) // Sfragisticheskij meridian: Kiїv-Korsun' / Χερσόν — Κόνσταντίνοπολίσ: Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo kollokviuma po russko-vizantijskoj fragistike. Sevastopol': SPD Aref'ev, 2013. S. 39—40.

15. Gertsen A. G., Alekseenko N. A. Vizantijskie molivdovuly iz raskopok Mangup-Kale // Antichnaya drevnost' i srednie veka. Ekaterinburg, 2002. Vyp. 33. S. 59—65.

16. Gertsen A. G., Mogarichev Yu. M. Kyrk-Er-Chufut-Kale. Krepost' na krayu sed'mogo klimata. Simferopol': Antikva, 2016.

17. Mogarichev Yu. M. Krymskaya Gotiya v III—VIII vekakh // Ocherki istorii khristianskikh tsivilizatsij. T. 1. Ot zarozhdeniya do arabskikh zavoevanij. Kn. 1. M.: Rosspen, 2019. S. 430—437.

18. Mogarichev Yu. M. K voprosu o vremeni i obstoyatel'stvakh poyavleniya proekta «Gotskaya mitropoliya» (Not. III) // Drevnejshie gosudarstva Vostochnoj Evropy. 2021 god: Vostochnaya Evropa i mir islama. K yubileyu Tat'yany Mikhajlovny Kalininoj. M.: Universitet Dmitriya Pozharskogo, 2021. S. 368—383.

19. Mogarichev Yu. M. Sazanov A. V., Sorochan S. B. Krym v «khazarskoe» vremya (VIII — seredina X vv.): voprosy istorii i arkheologii. M.: Neolit, 2017.

20. Mogarichev Yu. M., Sazanov A. V., Shaposhnikov A. K. Zhitie Ioanna Gotskogo v kontekste istorii Kryma «khazarskogo perioda». Simferopol': Antikva, 2007.

21. Mogarichev Yu. M., Sorochan S. B. K voprosu ob administrativno-territorial'nom ustrojstve Bospora vo vtoroj polovine VI—VIII vv. // Dobrudzha. Dobrich: Silistra, 2015. № 30. S. 152—155.

22. Naumenko V. E. K voprosu o titulakh «topakh» i «kir» v istorii Tavriki kontsa VIII — nachala IX v. // Khersonesskij kolokol. Simferopol', 2008. S. 333—338.

23. Naumenko V. E., Gertsen A. G. O vremeni stroitel'stva vizantijskoj kreposti na Mangupe. Suschestvuyut li osnovaniya dlya vozobnovleniya diskussii? // Vizantijskij «krug zemel'» Orbis terrarum Byzantinus… Tez. dokl. XXIII-j Vserossijskoj nauchnoj sessii vizantinistov RF. Simferopol': ARIAL, 2022. S. 126—129.

24. Nikiforov M. A. K diskussii o date uchrezhdeniya vizantijskoj femy v Tavrike // Materialy po arkheologii, istorii i ehtnografii Tavrii. Simferopol', 2009. Vyp. XV. S. 550—560.

25. Prokopij Kesarijskij. Vojna s gotami. O postrojkakh. M.: Arktos, 1996.

26. Solomonik Eh. I., Dombrovskij O. I. O lokalizatsii strany Dori // Arkheologicheskie issledovaniya srednevekovogo Kryma. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 1968. S. 11—44.

27. Sorochan S. B. Vizantijskij Kherson. Ocherki istorii i kul'tury. Khar'kov: Majdan, 2005. Ch. 1—2.

28. Sorochan S. B. K voprosu o vremeni sozdaniya femy Klimata v vizantijskom Krymu // Drevnosti. 2011. Khar'kovskij istoriko-arkheologicheskij ezhegodnik. Khar'kov, 2011. Vyp. 10. S. 350—352.

29. Sorochan S. B., Smychkov K. D. Kiry vizantijskogo Khersona: problemy statusa i datirovki // Problemy istorii, filologii, kul'tury. M.: Magnitogorsk, 2006. Vyp. XVI/1. S. 207—217.

30. Khrapunov N. I. O vzaimootnosheniyakh Bospora i Vizantii pri Yustiniane I // Vita Antigua. Kiїv, 2003. № 5-6. S. 171—178.

31. Khrapunov N. I. K diskussii o dolzhnosti duki Khersona // Vizantijskij Vremennik. 2011. T. 70 (95). S. 37—50.

32. Khrapunov N. I. K voprosu o roli gorodskoj obschiny v upravlenii vizantijskim Khersonom v VIII—XI vv. // Antichnaya drevnost' i srednie veka. Ekaterinburg, 2014. Vyp. 42. S. 111—131.

33. Tsukerman K. K voprosu o rannej istorii femy Khersona // Bakhchisarajskij istoriko-arkheologicheskij sbornik. Simferopol', 1997. Vyp. 1. S. 312—323.

34. Tsukerman K. Politika Vizantii v Severnom Prichernomor'e po dannyam Notitiae episcopatuum // Materialy po arkheologii, istorii i ehtnografii Tavrii. Vyp. XVI. Simferopol', 2010. C. 399—435.

35. Chichurov I. S. Vizantijskie istoricheskie sochineniya. M.: Nauka, 1980.

36. Chichurov I. S. Mesto khronografii Feofana v rannevizantijskoj istoricheskoj traditsii (IV — nachalo IX v.) // Drevnejshie gosudarstva na territorii SSSR. Materialy i soobscheniya. M., 1981. S. 5—146.

37. Gertsen A. G. Main stages of the history Doros-Theodoro (Mangup) in the light of archaelogical research expedition Taurida Vernadsky National University // Uchenye zapiski TNU im. V. I. Vernadskogo. Ser.: Istoricheskie nauki. 2013. T. 26 (65). № 1. R. 193—206.

38. Darrouzes J. Notitiae episcopatuum ecclesiae Constantinopolitanae. P.: Institut Francais d`Etudes Byzantines, 1981.

39. Migne J. P. Patrologie Cursus Completus. P., 1864. (Series Latina; CXXIX).