Changing the Role of Diplomacy in the Ottoman Empire of the 16th Century
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Changing the Role of Diplomacy in the Ottoman Empire of the 16th Century
Annotation
PII
S207987840030822-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Ekaterina Kozub 
Affiliation: Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Address: Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod
Alim Abidulin
Affiliation: Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Address: Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod
Abstract

The article analyzes the process of gradual change in the methods of interaction between the Ottoman Empire and other states. During the 16th century, the forceful methods of interaction between the Ottoman Empire and foreign states began to give way to diplomatic methods. The Ottomans began to realize that sometimes it is easier and more profitable to settle relations with other powers or achieve their political goals through diplomacy. The authors note that the diplomacy conducted by the Ottoman Empire differed significantly from the European one, which was probably due to the peculiarities of the Ottoman ideology, the influence of which was reflected in various spheres. Particular attention is paid to the characteristics of the Ottoman diplomatic institutions and mechanisms. It is noted that a large number of people were involved in diplomatic activities, although not all of them held official positions. An important place in the article is given to the characterization of diplomatic documents. The most significant of them are several types of ahdname (capitulations, sultan's letters (nami-i Humayun), unilateral agreements issued to those countries that recognized Ottoman rule. The authors identify and analyze several models of diplomacy carried out by the Western powers in the Ottoman Empire during the 16th century and emphasize that the Ottoman sultans often perceived the signing of treaties and agreements by other states with the Ottoman Empire as a sign that they obeyed it, and did not consider it equal. The conclusion drawn in this article is that  during the 16th century, the Ottomans increasingly began to resolve various issues with other states using diplomacy. Through negotiations, it was possible to avoid military clashes or end bloody battles on favorable terms for all sides.

Keywords
Ottoman Empire, diplomacy, Suleiman the Magnificent, diplomatic methods, diplomatic activity, diplomatic ceremony
Источник финансирования
The research was completed under the RSCF grant No. 20-18-00374-П performed on the basis of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod.
Received
07.12.2023
Publication date
31.07.2024
Number of characters
30408
Number of purchasers
7
Views
114
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2024

References

1. Agoston G. Masters B. Encyclopedia of the Ottoman Empire. N. Y., 2008.

2. Casale G. The Ottoman Age of Exploration. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 2010.

3. Dursteler Eric R. Venetians in Constantinople: Nation, Identity, and Coexistence in the Early Modern Mediterranean, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2006.

4. Goffman D. Negotiating with the Renaissance State: the Ottoman Empire and the New Diplomacy // The Early Modern Ottomans: Remapping the Empire / eds. V. Aksan and D. Goffman. Cambridge: Cambridge, 1954.

5. B. J. von Hammer Osmanlı Devleti Tarihi / turkish trans. by M. Ata Bey, eds. M. Çevik and E. Kılıç. VI. Istanbul: Üçdal Publications, 1984.

6. Inalcik H. An outline of Ottoman-Venetian relations // Venezia centro di mediazione tra oriente e occidente (secoli XV-XVI). Aspetti e problemi. 1977. Vol. 1. S. 83—90.

7. Karateke H. T. (ed.) An Ottoman Protocol Register. Istanbul, 2007.

8. Koca Hüseyin Bedâyiu’l-vekāyi‘ (nşr. A. S. Tveritinovoy). Moskva, 1961. Vol. II. 384b, 423a.

9. Özkaya Y. Osmanli Imparatorlugunda Ayanlik. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi, 1994.

10. Reid A. Sixteenth Century Turkish Influence in Western Indonesia // Journal of South-East Asian History. Vol. 10. No. 3. 1969. P. 401—402.

11. Savaş A. İ. Osmanlı Diplomasisi. İstanbul: 3F Yayınevi, 2007.

12. Shaw St. J. History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey. Vol. 1: (1280—1808). L.: Cambridge University Press, 1976. P. 170.

13. Terry J. J. Ottoman Empire: 1450—1750 // Enclyclopedia of World History. Vol. 3 / ed. by Ackermann, et al. Facts on File, Inc. N. Y., 2008. P. 288—293.

14. Uzunçarşılı İ. H. Osmanlı Devletinin merkez ve bahriye teşkilâtı. Ankara: T ürk Tarih Kurumu, 1988.

15. Abidulin A., Kozub E. The Ideology of Ottomanism and Symbols of Power During the Reign of Sultan Suleiman I // ISTORIYA. 2023. Vol. 14. Issue 12 (134). Part 2. URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840026404-3-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840026404-3

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate