Pelopidas as a Negotiator in the Context of Diplomacy of the Theban Polis

Mozhajsky, Andrej

doi:10.18254/S207987840030487-4

English

Home>Issue 4 (138)>Pelopidas as a Negotiator in the Context of Diplomacy of the Theban Polis

Pelopidas as a Negotiator in the Context of Diplomacy of the Theban Polis

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

Pelopidas as a Negotiator in the Context of Diplomacy of the Theban Polis

Annotation

PII

S207987840030487-4-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840030487-4

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Andrej Mozhajsky Send message

ORCID: 0000-0003-1112-2858

Affiliation: Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Edition

Volume 15 Issue 4 (138)

Abstract

The paper examines the negotiating activities of the Theban statesman and commander Pelopidas. Much of this activity was concentrated within the diplomatic contacts of the Theban polis. It was Pelopidas who was responsible for the negotiation process in the northern direction (in Thessaly and Macedonia), as well as for negotiations with the Persians. An analysis of narrative sources shows that Pelopidas’ greatest fame as a negotiator was brought by his embassy to Susa to the court of the Persian king Artaxerxes in 367 BC. The success of Pelopidas with the Persian king was facilitated by his personal qualities, as well as the rhetorical and semantic features of the speech of the Theban ambassador. The negotiations took place face to face, and for Artaxerxes the words of Pelopidas turned out to be more meaningful than the Attic ones, but at the same time more laconic than the Spartan ones, which characterizes the individual oratorical style of Pelopidas. Likewise, the semantic load of Pelopidas’s speech was chosen taking into account historical and foreign policy realities. Narrative sources show that from a young age Pelopidas had the ability to inspire, convince and teach other people. Already before the coup in Thebes of 378 BC. Pelopidas made speeches calling for the liberation of Thebes from the Spartans, which inspired his comrades, and during the coup itself he was probably responsible for negotiations with the Spartan garrison of Kadmeia. Literary tradition credits Pelopidas with drawing up a proposal to the Spartan Sphodrias that he should seize the Athenian Piraeus. According to this version, the words of Pelopidas seduced Sphodrias more than money. Pelopidas also spoke in Thebes against the skilled orator Meneclides and won the trial. As for Pelopidas’ northern diplomacy, trying to bring Thessaly and Macedonia under Theban control, he managed to achieve a lot.

Keywords

Thebes, personality, Pelopidas, negotiations, diplomacy, Susa, Thessaly, Macedonia, Epaminondas, polis

Received

01.03.2024

Publication date

15.06.2024

Number of characters

74368

Number of purchasers

Views

170

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Mozhajsky A. Pelopidas as a Negotiator in the Context of Diplomacy of the Theban Polis // ISTORIYA. – 2024. – V. 15. – Issue 4 (138). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840030487-4-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840030487-4
MLA	Mozhajsky, Andrej "Pelopidas as a Negotiator in the Context of Diplomacy of the Theban Polis." ISTORIYA. 15.4 (138) (2024). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840030487-4
APA	Mozhajsky A. (2024). Pelopidas as a Negotiator in the Context of Diplomacy of the Theban Polis. ISTORIYA. vol. 15, no. 4 (138) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840030487-4

Full text is available to subscribers only

Subscribe right now

Only article and additional services

Subscription benefits

200 RUB / 1.0 SU

Whole issue and additional services

Subscription benefits

820 RUB / 10.0 SU

All issues and additional services for 2024

Subscription benefits

5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Ksenofontos S. Voennoe prostranstvo i pajdejya v zhizneopisaniyakh Pirra i Mariya // Hypothekai. 2020. Vyp. 4. S. 207—223.

2. Mozhajskij A. Yu. Vneshnepoliticheskij kurs Fivanskogo polisa v klassicheskij period. Dis. … kand. ist. nauk. M., 2007.

3. Mozhajskij A. Yu. Reki i vorota Fiv v tragediyakh Ehskhila, Sofokla i Evripida kak chast' obrazovatel'nogo prostranstva goroda // Hypothekai. 2018. Vyp. 2. S. 79—96.

4. Mozhajskij A. Yu. Zakhvat spartantsami Fiv v 382 g. do n. eh. // Lokus: lyudi, obschestvo, kul'tury, smysly. 2019. № 4. S. 20—29.

5. Mozhajskij A. Yu. Obraz fivantsev v sochineniyakh Ksenofonta // ΣΧΟΛΗ. Filosofskoe antikovedenie i klassicheskaya traditsiya. 2019. T. 13. Vyp. 2. S. 580—595.

6. Mozhajsky A. Eurymachoi and Leontiadai: “Unknown” Personalities in the Context of the Politics of the Theban Polis // ISTORIYA. 2023. Vol. 14. Issue 4 (126). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840025995-3-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840025995-3

7. Braithwaite-Westoby K. Epaminondas the Great. Dunedin (NZ), 2019.

8. Buck R. J. Boiotia and the Boiotian League, 432—371 B. C. Edmonton, 1994.

9. Buckler J. The Theban Hegemony, 371—362 B. C. L., 1980.

10. Buckler J., Beck H. Central Greece and the Politics of Power in the Fourth Century B. C. N. Y., 2008.

11. Cawkwell G. L. Epaminondas and Thebes // The Classical Quarterly. 1972. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 254—277.

12. Cook M. Ancient Political Factions: Boiotia 404 to 395 // Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974—2014). 1988. Vol. 118. P. 57—85.

13. De Jong Irene J. F. Narratology and Classics: A Practical Guide. Oxford, 2014.

14. Fortina M. Epaminonda. Torino; Milano; Genova; Parma; R.; Catania, 1958.

15. Hatzopoulos M. B. La Béotie et la Macédoine à l’époque de l’hégémonie thébaine: le point de vue macédonien // La Béotie antique / eds. P. Roesch, G. Argoud. P., 1985. P. 247—257.

16. Helly B. L’État thessalien. Aleuas le Roux les tetrades et les tagoi (Collection de la Maison de l’Orient méditerranéen 25). Lyon, 1995.

17. Lenfant D. Isménias et les ambassadeurs de Thèbes à la cour perse // Ktèma: civilisations de l’Orient, de la Grèce et de Rome antiques. 2011. No. 36. P. 331—347.

18. Liddel H. G., Scott R. A Greek-English Lexicon. 9th ed. N., Y.; Oxford, 1996.

19. Mozhajsky A. Yu. The myth of the War of the Seven and Pausanias’ educational topography // Hypothekai. 2020. Is. 4. P. 171—206.

20. Murray S. R. “Won by the spear”: the importance of the Dory to the Ancient Greek warrior // Hypothekai. 2020. Is. 4. P. 74—88.

21. Rhodes P. J. A history of the classical Greek world: 478—323 B.C. Padstow, 2006.

22. Schachter A. Politics and personalities in Classical Thebes // Schachter A. Boiotia in Antiquity: Selected Papers. Cambridge, 2016. P. 66—79.

23. Shrimpton G. S. The Epaminondas Tradition. Stanford, 1970.

24. Sordi M. La lega tessala fino ad Alessandro Magno (Studi pubblicati dall’Istituto italiano per la Storia antica XV). R., 1958.

25. Tuci P. A. The Speeches of Theban Ambassadors in Greek Literature (404—362 B. C.) // Ktèma: civilisations de l’Orient, de la Grèce et de Rome antiques. 2019. No. 44. P. 33—52.

26. Tufano S. Epaminonda di Tebe. Vita e sconfitte di un politico di successo. Milano, 2023.

27. Westlake H. D. Xenophon and Epaminondas // Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies. 1975. Vol. 16. P. 23—40.

28. Xenophontos S. Military space and paideia in the Lives of Pyrrhus and Marius // Space, Time and Language in Plutarch / ed. A. Georgiadou and K. Oikonomopoulou. B.; Boston, 2017. P. 317—326.