The Problem of Legal Acculturation of the Kazakh People's Court of the Early 20th Century in the Assessment of the Orenburg Lawyer and Public Figure L. A. Slovohotov
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
The Problem of Legal Acculturation of the Kazakh People's Court of the Early 20th Century in the Assessment of the Orenburg Lawyer and Public Figure L. A. Slovohotov
Annotation
PII
S207987840029945-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Sergey Lyubichankovskiy 
Occupation: Professor, Doctor of Historical Sciences, Head of the Department of History of Russia of the Orenburg State Pedagogical University; Senior Researcher at the Laboratory of Historical and Environmental Anthropology, Tyumen State University
Affiliation: Orenburg State Pedagogical University
Address: Russian Federation, Orenburg
Svetlana Aleshina
Affiliation: Orenburg State Pedagogical University
Address: Russian Federation, Orenburg
Abstract

The article analyzes the contribution of a prominent public and judicial figure of Orenburg Leonid Alexandrovich Slovohotov to the social and scientific discussion about the possibilities of using traditional institutions of justice in the all-imperial system of government and court, which unfolded in the late 19th — early 20th century. The views of L. A. Slovohotov concerning the people's court of the Kazakh people are analyzed. The absentee dispute between L. A. Slovohotov, on the one hand, and N. Dingilstedt, N. Maximov, I. I. Kraft and A. I. Dobrosmyslov, on the other hand, is shown. It is concluded that, according to L. A. Slovohotov, not the eradication of traditional forms of justice and legal consciousness was the main way of further integration of the Kazakh society into the all-Russian socio-cultural field, but the need for legal acculturation of the Kazakh people's court of the early 20th century through its inclusion in the all-imperial system of justice.

Keywords
acculturation, imperial acculturation policy, justice, integration of the periphery, people's court, Kazakhs
Источник финансирования
The study was carried out at the expense of the grant of the Russian Science Foundation No. 23-18-00268, the project “Justice in the system of security and integration processes of the peripheral regions of the Russian Empire (18th — early 20th century)”, realized on the basis of Tyumen State University.
Received
04.07.2023
Publication date
31.01.2024
Number of characters
25785
Number of purchasers
8
Views
177
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2024

References

1. Vasil'ev D. V. Administrativnaya akkul'turatsiya: opyt regional'noj politiki Rossijskoj imperii v Tsentral'noj Azii. XVIII—XIX vv.: monografiya. Orenburg: Izdatel'skij tsentr OGAU, 2018.

2. Vasil'ev D. V. Bremya imperii. Administrativnaya politika Rossii v Tsentral'noj Azii. Vtoraya polovina XIX v. M.: Izd-vo «Politicheskaya ehntsiklopediya», 2018.

3. Vasil'ev D. V. Rossiya i Kazakhskaya step': administrativnaya politika i status okrainy. XVIII — pervaya polovina XIX vv. M.: ROSPEhN, 2014.

4. Voropanov V. A. Sud i pravosudie v provintsii Rossijskogo gosudarstva v XVI — pervoj polovine XVIII vv. (na primere oblastej Povolzh'ya, Urala i Zapadnoj Sibiri): monografiya. M.: Prospekt, 2017.

5. Voropanov V. A. Formirovanie institutov sudebnoj sistemy Rossijskoj imperii v Kazakhstane v usloviyakh frontirnoj modernizatsii v kontse XVIII v. // Cahiers du Monde Russe. 2020. T. 60. № 4. S. 657—681.

6. Dingil'shtedt N. Odno iz otzhivayuschikh uchrezhdenij // Zhurnal grazhdanskogo i ugolovnogo prava. 1892. № 1. S. 43—97.

7. Dobrosmyslov A. I. Sud u kirgiz Turgajskoj oblasti v XVIII i XIX vv. Kazan', 1904.

8. Imperskaya politika akkul'turatsii i problema kolonializma (na primere kochevykh i polukochevykh narodov Rossijskoj imperii): monografiya / nauch. red. prof. S. V. Lyubichankovskij. Orenburg: Izdatel'skij tsentr OGAU, 2019.

9. Kotyukova T. V. Turkestan v diskurse frontirnoj modernizatsii Rossijskoj imperii v kontse XIX — nachale XX vv. // Islam v sovremennom mire: vnutrigosudarstvennyj i mezhdunarodno-politicheskij aspekty. 2015. T. 11. № 1. S. 43—54.

10. Kotyukova T. V. Turkestanskoe napravlenie dumskoj politiki Rossii (1905—1917 gg.). M.: Ehnter-Grafiko, 2008.

11. Kraft I. I. Sudebnaya chast' v Turkestanskom krae. Orenburg, 1898.

12. Lyubichankovskiy S. Accultural Model of an Empire as a Methodological Alternative to the Colonial Approach // ISTORIYA. 2019. Vol. 10. Issue 8 (82). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840006065-0-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840006065-0

13. Lyubichankovskiy S. Imperial Policy of Acculturation of “Foreigners” by Means of Enlightenment (Based on Materials from the Ural-Volga and Central Asian Territories of the Russian Empire) // ISTORIYA. 2021. Vol. 12. Issue 3 (101). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840014091-9-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840014091-9

14. Maksimov N. Narodnyj sud u kirgiz // Zhurnal yuridicheskogo obschestva. 1897. Kn. 7. S.123—147.

15. Malyshev N. Obychnoe semejnoe pravo u kirgiz. Yaroslavl', 1902.

16. Poberezhnikov I. V. Kanadskij i rossijskij frontir: obschee i osobennoe // Ural'skij istoricheskij vestnik. 2009. № 2. S. 25—30.

17. Pochekaev R. Pretended Suzerainty: Moscow Tsars and Kazakh Khans (According to Russian-Language Diplomatic Documents of the End of 16th — Beginning of 18th Centuries) // ISTORIYA. 2019. Vol. 10. Issue 1 (75). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840002567-2-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S0002567-2-1

18. Pochekaev R. Yu. Gubernatory i khany. Lichnostnyj faktor pravovoj politiki Rossijskoj imperii v Tsentral'noj Azii: XVIII — nachalo XX vv. M.: NIU VShEh, 2017.

19. Remnev A. V., Suvorova N. G. «Russkoe delo» na aziatskikh okrainakh: «russkost'» pod ugrozoj ili «somnitel'nye» kul'turtregery // Ab Imperio. 2008. № 2. S. 157—222.

20. Remnev A. V., Suvorova N. G. Kolonizatsiya Aziatskoj Rossii: imperskie i natsional'nye stsenarii vtoroj poloviny XIX — nachala XX vv.: monografiya. Omsk: Izdatel'skij dom «Nauka», 2013.

21. Slezkin Yu. Arkticheskie zerkala: Rossiya i malye narody Severa. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2008.

22. Slovokhotov L. A. Narodnyj sud obychnogo prava kirgiz Maloj ordy // Trudy Orenburgskoj uchenoj arkhivnoj komissii. Vyp. XV. Orenburg, 1905.

23. Trepavlov V. V. «Belyj tsar'». Obraz monarkha i predstavleniya o poddanstve u narodov Rossii XV—XVIII vv. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Olega Abyshko, 2017.

24. Kharuzin A. N. K voprosu o proiskhozhdenii kirgizskogo naroda // Ehtnograficheskoe obozrenie. 1895. № 3. S. 49—92.

25. Shablej P. S. Poddanstvo v Aziatskoj Rossii: istoricheskij smysl i politiko-pravovaya kontseptualizatsiya // Vestnik Evrazii. 2008. № 3. S. 99—122.

26. Lyubichankovskiy S. V. Imperial Acculturation on Russia’s Southeastern Frontier: An International Survey // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Istoriya Rossii. 2020. T. 19. № 3. S. 727—740.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate