Везде
Modern Political Protest in the US: Conceptual Framework, Values, Practices
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Modern Political Protest in the US: Conceptual Framework, Values, Practices
Annotation
PII
S207987840029772-8-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840029772-8
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Vladimir Krotkov 
ORCID: 0009-0002-1274-4958
Affiliation: State Academic University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Volume 14 Issue 12 (134). Part 2
Abstract

The article analyzes theoretical and methodological approaches to issues related to socio-political mobilization. The main historical eras (premodern, modernity and postmodern) are taken as a basis, which determine various forms, types and practices of political protest. Thus, it is concluded that the level of development of society directly affects political actors, institutional architecture in structural, procedural and regulatory terms, which determines the nature of socio-political actionism. Attention is paid to the practices of postmodern society, which have their own specifics, which is expressed in the formation of a dichotomous, ideological-value spectrum, the struggle for symbolic capital, antagonism between different identities and related social narratives. A special place in the analysis is given to the political-regime configuration, in particular, the post-democratic crisis, which, in the case of American public practices, is to a certain extent overcome through the mechanics of agonistic and counter-democracy. The study uses the method of situational analysis (case studies), which has its own epistemological variability in the form of positivist, critical and interpretive (post-positivist) components. The article also examines the public political struggle in the United States in line with symbolic policies during the presidency of D. Trump. The repertoire of American protest is analyzed in the designated methodological context. Particular attention is paid to the generation aspect of the unconventional protest movement, which is one of the key in both the United States, in particular, and Russia, which is paid to part of the comparativist analysis. The conclusion assesses the relevance of two hypotheses formulated by E. V. Brodovskaya, M. A. Davydova, E. A. Eremin regarding the influence of the level of rigidity of the political regime and the legitimacy of the inactive part of society on the continuum of political manifestation in the United States. If the first conclusion had its practical expression on the example of the American case, then the second looks less unambiguous.

Keywords
history, symbolic politics, legitimacy of power, identity, political protest, political regime, axiology, ideological spectrum, post-democracy, counter-democracy, agonistic democracy, USA
Источник финансирования
The article was prepared at the State Academic University of the Humanities as part of the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (FZNF-2023-0004 project — «Digitalization and formation of a modern information society: cognitive, economic, political and legal aspects»).
Received
05.09.2023
Publication date
31.12.2023
Number of characters
39307
Number of purchasers
7
Views
300
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
200 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
820 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2023
Subscription benefits
5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Bauman Z. Sposobny li Facebook i Twitter pomoch' rasprostraneniyu demokratii i prav cheloveka. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.russ.ru/Mirovaya-povestka/Sposobny-li-Facebook-i-Twitter-pomoch-rasprostraneniyu-demokratii-i-prav-cheloveka (data obrascheniya: 11.07.2023).

2. Bogaevskaya O. V., Borisova A. R., Davydov A. A. [i dr.] Pandemiya, protesty, protektsionizm i prezidentskie vybory v SShA v 2020 g. // Analiz i prognoz. Zhurnal IMEhMO RAN. 2021. № 1. S. 32—56.

3. Bondarev I. V. Vliyanie protestov “Black Lives Matter” na prezidentskuyu gonku v SShA v 2020 g. // Gumanitarnyj aktsent. 2021. № 2. S. 36—42.

4. Bosobrod P. A. K probleme krizisa sovremennoj demokratii // Politicheskaya ehkspertiza: POLITEhKS. 2014. T. 10. № 3. S. 198—207.

5. Brodovskaya E. V., Davydova M. A., Eryomin E. A. Prolongirovannye politicheskie protesty v Rossii i v Respublike Belarus' letom-osen'yu 2020 goda: referentnost' rossijskoj auditorii sotsial'nykh media // Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. 2021. T. 11. № 1. S. 6—12.

6. Brodovskaya E. V., Dombrovskaya A. Yu., Lukushin V. A. Upravlenie setyami sotsial'nogo nedovol'stva v rossijskikh regional'nykh segmentakh sotsial'nykh media v 2022 godu: analiz sotsial'nykh grafov // Ehkonomiko-upravlencheskij kongress: Sbornik statej po materialam Mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-prakticheskogo meropriyatiya NIU «BelGU». Belgorod, 10—11 noyabrya 2022 g. / otv. red. V. M. Zakharov. Belgorod: Belgorodskij gosudarstvennyj natsional'nyj issledovatel'skij universitet, 2022.

7. Isterli U. Tiraniya ehkspertov. Ehkonomisty, diktatory i zabytye prava bednykh / per. s angl. O. Levchenko, nauch. red. per. D. Shestakov. M.: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara, 2016.

8. Kalashnikov K. N. Postsotsialisticheskaya nostal'giya v sovremennom rossijskom sotsiume // Sotsial'noe prostranstvo. 2023. T. 9. № 2. S. 10.

9. Kastel's M. Vlast' kommunikatsii / per. s angl. M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki, 2016.

10. Kislitsyn S. V. Respublikanskaya partiya SShA i problemy identichnosti // SShA i Kanada: ehkonomika, politika, kul'tura. 2021. № 9. S. 31—53.

11. Komarov M. V., Losich Zh. V. Diskursivnaya artikulyatsiya generatsionnogo opyta kak dolgosrochnyj faktor doveriya politicheskim institutam: postanovka problemy // Polilog/Polylogos. 2023. T. 7. № 1. URL: https://polylogos-journal.ru/s258770110023473-2-1/

12. Kostyushev V. V. Sotsial'nyj protest v pole politiki: potentsial, repertuar, diskurs (opyt teoreticheskoj interpretatsii i ehmpiricheskoj verifikatsii) // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2011. № 4. S. 144—157.

13. Krauch K. Postdemokratiya / per. s angl. N. V. Ehdel'mana. M.: Izd. dom Gos. un-ta Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki, 2010.

14. Krotkov V. Historical Politics as a Tool for Legitimizing the Elite and National Identity // ISTORIYA. 2022. Vol. 13. Issue 2 (112). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840020443-6-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840020443-6

15. Krotkov V. O. Kontseptualizatsiya politicheskogo protesta: teoreticheskie osnovaniya i rossijskaya praktika // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. 2021. № 2. S. 80—93.

16. Lebon G. Psikhologiya narodov i mass / per. s fr. M.: AST. 2017.

17. Letnyakov D. Eh. Vykhodya za predely «ehlektoralizma»: agonisticheskaya demokratiya protiv perspektivy postpolitiki // Polilog/Polylogos. 2022. T. 6. № 4. URL: https://polylogos-journal.ru/s258770110023494-5-1/1

18. Popper K. Nischeta istoritsizma / per. s angl. M.: Progress VIA, 1993. S. III.

19. Prilutskij V. V. Protestnye dvizheniya v sovremennoj Amerike (2009—2019 gg.) // Vestnik Bryanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2019. № 2. S. 78.

20. Rudenkin D. V. Politicheskij protest kak ob'ekt analiza sotsial'no-gumanitarnoj nauki: osnovnye kontseptual'nye podkhody // Byulleten' nauki i praktiki. 2019. T. 5. № 9. S. 345—354.

21. Semenov A. V. Sobytijnyj analiz protestov kak instrument izucheniya politicheskoj mobilizatsii // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 2018. T. 17. № 2. S. 320.

22. Sokol'schik L. M. SShA — strana pobedivshego protesta? URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/ssha-strana-pobedivshego-protesta/ (data obrascheniya: 11.07.2023).

23. Sopot M. A. Kontseptsiya kontrdemokratii P'era Rozanvallona i primery ee realizatsii // Gumanitarnyj aktsent. 2021. № 2. S. 20—25.

24. Travkina N. M. Ozhivshaya istoriya SShA: grazhdanskaya vojna pamyatnikov // Kontury global'nykh transformatsij: politika, ehkonomika, pravo. 2018. T. 11. № 2. S. 12—29.

25. Shomova S. A. «Vojna memov»: novye povoroty informatsionnogo protivostoyaniya // Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. 2019. № 5. C. 250—268.

26. Shomova S. A. Politicheskij storitelling v vizual'noj kommunikatsii // Vizual'naya kommunikatsiya v sotsiokul'turnoj dinamike: sbornik statej II Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferentsii, Kazan', 24—25 noyabrya 2016 goda. Kazan': Kazanskij (Privolzhskij) federal'nyj universitet, 2016. S. 302—306.

27. Crozier M., Huntington S., Watanuki J. The Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. N. Y.: New York University Press, 1975.

28. Franzosi R. From Words to Numbers: Narrative, Data, and Social Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2004.

29. Jenkins H. Convergence Culture: Where old and new media collide. N. Y.: New York University Press, 2006.

30. Milkman R. A New Political Generation: Millennials and the Post-2008 Wave of Protest // American Sociological Review. 2017. Vol. 82. Is. 1. P. 1—31.

31. Mouffe Ch. On the Political. L.; N. Y.: Routledge, 2005.

32. Offe C. New Social Movements: Challenging the Boundaries of Institutional Politics // Social Research. 1985. Vol. 52. No. 4. P. 869—890.

33. Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009.

34. Rosanvallon P. Counterdemocracy: politics in the age of Distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

35. Russett B., Deutsch K., Alker H., Lasswell H. World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators, 1961—1963. 1968.

36. Savat S. The Divide Between Us: Urban-Rural Political Differences Rooted in Geography. Washington University in St. Louis, 2020.

37. Taylor C., Hudson M. World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators II: 1948—1967: Annual Event Data, Ann Arbor: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, 1975.

38. Tilly Ch. Popular Contention in Britain, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.

39. Amid Protests, Majorities Across Racial and Ethnic Groups Express Support for the Black Lives Matter Movement. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2020/06/12/amid-protests-majorities-across-racial-and-ethnic-groups-express-support-for-the-black-lives-matter-movement/ (data obrascheniya: 17.07.2023).

40. Digital Democracy Summit. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://digital.mehr-demokratie.de/ (data obrascheniya: 16.07.2023).

41. Do you support or oppose the Black Lives Matter movement? [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://civiqs.com/results/black_lives_matter?annotations=true&uncertainty=true&zoomIn=true (data obrascheniya: 17.07.2023).

42. Political Typology Reveals Deep Fissures on the Right and Left // Pew Research Center. 24.10.2017. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/10/24/political-typology-revealsdeep-fissures-on-the-right-and-left/ (data obrascheniya: 19.07.2023).

43. Two in Three Americans Support Racial Justice Protests Gallup. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://news.gallup.com/poll/316106/two-three-americans-supportracial-justice-protests.aspx (data obrascheniya: 15.07.2023).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate