The Role of “Cultural Turns” in the Study of the History of Religion and Church History
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
The Role of “Cultural Turns” in the Study of the History of Religion and Church History
Annotation
PII
S207987840029690-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Ivan Davydov 
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

The relevance of this study is grounded in the need to regularly revise and update the methodological tools of the humanities, including those of history. The object of the philosophical and methodological analysis undertaken by the author is the so-called “cultural” turns in the humanities of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. The object of the philosophical and methodological analysis undertaken by the author is the so-called “cultural” turns in the humanities of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries, and the subject is their significance for the improvement of historical methodology applied to the study of the history of religion and the Christian Church. The aim of the study is to explicate the “cultural turns” that are most heuristically relevant for the history of religion and the Church, and thus the following objectives have been set and accomplished: 1) to briefly review the history of the emergence of “cultural turns”, drawing on the achievements of international scholars (Doris Bachmann-Medick, Clifford J. Girtz, James Clifford, Jörg Doering, Tristan Thielmann, Henri Lefebvre, William John T. Mitchell, Victor Turner, Edward Said, Max Imdahl, Natalija Potapova); 2) to explore the directions of evolution of historical scholarship in the paradigmatic perspective of philosophy of science (taking into account the theoretical works of Giorgio Agamben, Michel Foucault, Marina Rumyantseva and Lorina Repina); 3) to compare the chronological framework and methodological “reference points” of the five currently coexisting and competing paradigms and at least ten “cultural turns” in the field of the humanities, which is the novelty of the study undertaken. Major conclusions: The “modernist” (non-classical) paradigm of the mid-twentieth century corresponds to the “start” of the performative and iconic turns, but the most fruitful was the time of the post-non-classical paradigm (1960s — 1980s), within the chronological framework of which a range of epistemological “turns” (such as interpretive, reflective, postcolonial, translational and spatial) emerged. The neo-historical turn marked the beginning of the neoclassical paradigm, while the pragmatic, “theatrical” and “corporeal” ones marked the beginning of the post-post-non-classical paradigm. The latest post-neoclassical turn may entail a return of interest in religion (“religious studies turn”). The neo-historical turn marked the beginning of the neoclassical paradigm, while the pragmatic, “theatrical” and “body” turn marked the beginning of the post-post-non-classical paradigm. The latest post-neoclassical turn may entail a return of interest in religion (“religious studies turn”).

Keywords
philosophy of history, history of religion, Christian Church, liturgical studies, religious identity, epistemology
Источник финансирования
The research was carried out as part of the Programme for Development of the Interdisciplinary Scholarly and Educational School of the Moscow University “Preservation of the World's Cultural and Historical Heritageˮ.
Received
17.07.2023
Publication date
31.12.2023
Number of characters
29970
Number of purchasers
7
Views
236
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2023

References

1. Antologiya issledovanij kul'tury. Interpretatsii kul'tury / sost. L. A. Mostova. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 2006.

2. Bakhmann-Medik D. Kul'turnye povoroty. Novye orientiry v naukakh o kul'ture / per. s nem. S. Tashkenova. M.: NLO, 2017.

3. Bodrijyar Zh. K kritike politicheskoj ehkonomii znaka / per. s frants. i poslesl. D. Kralechkin. M.: Biblion-Russkaya kniga, 2003.

4. Bross Sh. de. O kul'te bogov-fetishej, ili Sravnenie drevnej religii Egipta s sovremennoj religiej Nigritii // Sharl' de Bross o fetishizme / per. s frants., primech. L. R. Dunaevskij; obsch. red. i predisl. M. I. Shakhnovich. M.: Mysl', 1973. S. 14—124.

5. Girts K. Interpretatsiya kul'tur / per. s angl. O. V. Barsukova, A. A. Borzunov, G. M. Dashevskij. M.: ROSPEhN, 2004.

6. Davydov I. P. Khram i ritual: sotsial'nye funktsii svyaschennogo. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo RKhGA, 2021.

7. Davydov I. P., Fadeev I. A. Sravnitel'naya liturgika kak istoricheskaya distsiplina. Ehpistemologicheskij aspekt // Novaya i novejshaya istoriya. 2022. № 5. S. 5—20.

8. Dzhejmison F. Postmodernizm, ili Kul'turnaya logika pozdnego kapitalizma / per. s angl. D. Kralechkin; nauch. red. A. Olejnikov. M.: Izdatel'stvo Instituta Gajdara, 2019.

9. Imdal' M. Opyt drugogo videniya: stat'i ob iskusstve Kh—KhKh vv. / per. s nem. A. Vajsband. Kiev: Dukh i Litera, 2011.

10. Istochnikovedenie / otv. red. M. F. Rumyantseva. M.: Izdatel'skij dom Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki, 2015.

11. Kul'tura imeet znachenie. Kakim obrazom tsennosti sposobstvuyut obschestvennomu progressu / red. L. Kharrison, S. Khantington, per. s angl. A. Zakharov. M.: Moskovskaya shkola politicheskikh issledovanij, 2002.

12. Latur B. Novogo Vremeni ne bylo. Ehsse po simmetrichnoj antropologii / per. s frants. D. Ya. Kalugin, nauch. red. O. V. Kharkhordina. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Evropejskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2006.

13. Latur B. Peresborka sotsial'nogo: vvedenie v aktorno-setevuyu teoriyu / per. s angl. I. Polonskaya, red. S. Gavrilenko. M.: Izdatel'skij dom Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki, 2014.

14. Lefevr A. Proizvodstvo prostranstva / per. s frants. I. Staf. M.: Strelka Press, 2015.

15. Liotar Zh. -F. Sostoyanie postmoderna / per. s frants. N. A. Shmatko. SPb.: Institut ehksperimental'noj sotsiologii, 2016.

16. Lo Dzh. Posle metoda: besporyadok i sotsial'naya nauka / per. s angl. S. Gavrilenko, A. Pisarev, P. Khanova, nauch. red. S. Gavrilenko. M.: Izdatel'stvo Instituta Gajdara, 2015.

17. Metamodernizm. Istorichnost', Affekt i Glubina posle postmodernizma / red. van den R. Akker, Eh. Gibbons, T. Vermyulen, per. s angl. V. Lipka. M., vstupit. st. A. V. Pavlov. M.: Ripol-Klassik, 2019.

18. Mitchell U. Dzh. T. Ikonologiya. Obraz. Tekst. Ideologiya / per. s angl. V. Drozd. M.; Ekaterinburg: Kabinetnyj uchenyj, 2017.

19. Nikishenkov A. A. Istoriya britanskoj sotsial'noj antropologii. SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2008.

20. Pavlov A. V. Postpostmodernizm: kak sotsial'naya i kul'turnaya teorii ob'yasnyayut nashe vremya. M.: Delo, 2019.

21. Potapova N. D. Lingvisticheskij povorot v istoriografii. Uchebnoe posobie. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Evropejskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2015.

22. Psikhoanaliz i obschestvo: materialy Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferentsii, priurochennoj k 120-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Eh. Fromma / otv. red. E. I. Korostichenko. M.: IF RAN, 2022.

23. Rorti R. Filosofiya i zerkalo prirody / per. s angl., red. V. V. Tselischev. Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo Novosibirskogo universiteta, 1997.

24. Rumyantseva M. F. Istoricheskaya pamyat' i prezentatsiya istorii: neoklassicheskaya vs klassicheskaya — neklassicheskaya — postneklassicheskaya modeli istoricheskoj nauki // Sobytie v istorii, pamyati, narrativakh identichnosti / red. L. P. Repina. M.: Akvilon, 2017.

25. Sobytie v istorii, pamyati, narrativakh identichnosti / red. L. P. Repina. M.: Akvilon, 2017.

26. Tehrner V. Simvol i ritual / per. s angl.; sost. i predisl. V. A. Bejlis. M.: Nauka, 1983.

27. Fuko M. Slova i veschi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk / per. s frants. V. P. Vizgin, vstup. st. N. S. Avtonomova. SPb.: A-cad, 1994.

28. Khantington S. Kto my? Vyzovy amerikanskoj natsional'noj identichnosti / per. s angl. A. Bashkirov. M.: AST, 2004.

29. Khantington S. Stolknovenie tsivilizatsij / per. s angl. T. Velimeev, Yu. Novikov. M.: AST, 2003.

30. Actor Network Theory and After: Sociological Review / ed. J. Law, J. Hassard. Oxford, 1999.

31. Agamben G. The Kingdom and the Glory. For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government (Homo Sacer II, 2). Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011.

32. Agamben G. The Signature of All Things. On Method. N. Y.: Zone Books, 2009.

33. Burbulla J. Kunstgeschichte nach dem Spatial Turn. Eine Wiederentdeckung mit Kant, Panofsky und Dorner. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2015.

34. Clifford J. Returns. Becoming Indigenous in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge; L.: Harvard University Press, 2013.

35. Clifford J. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge; L.: Harvard University Press, 1988.

36. Jameson F. The Cultural Turn. Selected Writings on the Postmodern 1983—1998. L.; N. Y.: Verso, 1998.

37. Methodology in Religious Studies: The Interface with Women’s Studies / ed. A. Sharma. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2002.

38. Nationalism, colonialism, and literature / ed. T. Eagleton, F. Jameson, E. Said. W., introd. Deane S. Minneapolis; L.: University of Minnesota Press, 1990.

39. Said E. W. Beginnings. Intention and Method. N. Y.: Basic Books, 1975.

40. Said E. W. Orientalism. N. Y.: Routledge, 1979.

41. Science of Religion. Studies in Methodology Proceedings of the Study Conference of the International Association for the History of Religions, held in Turku, Finland, August 27—31, 1973 / ed. L. Honko. Hague; P.; N. Y.: International Association for the History of Religions, 1979.

42. Selected Readings in the Anthropology of Religion: Theoretical and Methodological Essays / ed. S. D. Glazier, C. A. Flowerday. L.: ‎Praeger, 2003.

43. Sign, Method and the Sacred. New Directions in Semiotic Methodologies for the Study of Religion / ed. J. Waardenburg, G. Benavides, M. Stausberg, A. Taves. B.: De Gruyter, 2021.

44. Sinding-Larsen S. Iconography and Ritual. A Study of Analytical Perspectives. Oslo; Bergen: Universitetsforlaget AS, 1984.

45. Smith Ch. J. Dancing Revolution: Bodies, Space, and Sound in American Cultural History. Urbana; Chicago; Springfield: University of Illinois Press, 2019.

46. Spatial Turn. Das Raumparadigma in den Kultur- und Sozialwissenschaften / ed. J. Döring, T. Thielmann. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2008.

47. Stollberg-Rilinger B. Rituale. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus Verlag GmbH, 2013.

48. Strenski I. Religion in Relation: Method, Application and Moral Location. L.: Palgrave Macmillan, 1993.

49. Strenski I. Understanding Theories of Religion: An Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2015.

50. Symbolische Kommunikation in der Vormoderne. Studien zur Geschichte, Literatur und Kunst / hrsg. G. Althoff, B. Stollberg-Rilinger, H. Wenzel. Köln; Weimar; Wien: Böhlau 2013.

51. The Agamben Dictionary / ed. A. Murray, J. Whyte. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2011.

52. The Cambridge Companion to the Body in Literature / ed. D. Hillman, U. Maude. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.

53. The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences / ed. T. J. McDonald. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996.

54. The Oxford Handbook of Postcolonial Studies / ed. G.Huggan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.

55. The Oxford Handbook of the Study of Religion / ed. S. Engler, M. Stausberg. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.

56. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion / ed. S. Engler, M. L. Stausberg; N. Y.: Routledge, 2011.

57. The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion / ed. S. Engler, M. L. Stausberg; N. Y.: Routledge, 2022.

58. The Spatial Turn: Interdisciplinary Perspectives / ed. B. Warf, S. Arias. N. Y.: Routledge, 2009.

59. Turner V. W. On the Edge of the Bush. Anthropology as Experience. Tucson: University of Arizona Press, 1985.

60. Vries H. de. Philosophy and the Turn to Religion. Baltimore; L.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.

61. Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography / ed. J. Clifford, G. E. Marcus. Berkeley; Los Angeles; L.: University of California Press, 1986.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate