Participation of Russia in the 1860—1861 International Commission on Syria
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Participation of Russia in the 1860—1861 International Commission on Syria
Annotation
PII
S207987840029670-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Alexander Sagomonyan 
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

The definition of the “Syrian crisis of 1860” is based on a series of bloody clashes and pogroms that broke out on the territory of Mount Lebanon and Damascus. These events had such a resonance in Europe that the government of the Ottoman Empire was forced to agree to the arrival of the French expeditionary force and the creation of an international commission consisting of representatives of five European powers — Britain, France, Russia, Austria and Prussia. The results of the commission's work turned out to be quite balanced and successful, ensuring the peaceful development of the region until the First World War. For Russia, participation in the European Commission has become a landmark event: this was one of the first episodes when, after the defeat in the Crimean War, she was able to fully perform in the ranks of the European concert, although, of course, not in the first roles. The purpose of this article is to analyze the role played by Russian diplomacy in resolving the Syrian conflict, and how participation in the work of the European Commission affected Russia's relations with other European powers.

Keywords
Ottoman Empire, Mount Lebanon, Druze, Maronites, International Commission, Organic Statute
Received
11.08.2023
Publication date
31.12.2023
Number of characters
26943
Number of purchasers
7
Views
148
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2023

References

1. Berg N. Ocherki poslednikh sirijskikh sobytij // Biblioteka dlya chteniya. 1863. Oktyabr'. S. 1—26.

2. Bulekov A. V., diak. O Maronitskoj tserkvi // Al'fa i Omega. 2000. № 1 (23). S. 322—350.

3. Zhantiev D. R. Mezhkul'turnye kontakty v khode frantsuzskoj interventsii v Livane v 1860—1861 gg. // Frantsuzskij ezhegodnik. M.: Nauka, 2018. S. 240—256.

4. Panchenkova M. T. Politika Frantsii na Blizhnem Vostoke i sirijskaya ehkspeditsiya 1860—1861 gg. M.: Nauka, 1966.

5. Rodionov M. A. Ehtnokonfessional'naya situatsiya v arabskom mire: istoki i perspektivy. SPb.: Prezidentskaya biblioteka, 2016.

6. Rukavishnikov E. N. Uchastie rossijskogo flota v uregulirovanii blizhnevostochnogo konflikta 1860—1861 gg. // Voprosy istorii. 2006. № 10. S. 108—114.

7. Cherkasov P. P. Aleksandr II i Napoleon III. Nesostoyavshijsya soyuz (1856—1870). M.: KMK, 2015.

8. Affaires etrangeres. Documents diplomatiques. 1861. T. 2. P., 1862.

9. Farah C. E. Politics of Interventionism in Ottoman Lebanon, 1830—1861. L.; N. Y.: I. B. Tauris, 2000.

10. Fawaz L. T. An Occasion for War. Civil Conflict in Lebanon and Damascus in 1860. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.

11. Makdisi U. Debating Religion, Reforms and Nationalism in the Ottoman Empire // International Journal of Middle East Studies. 2002. No. 34. P. 601—617.

12. Maoz M. Ottoman Reform in Syria and Palestine, 1840—1861: The Impact of the Tanzimat in Politics and Society. Oxford University Press, 1968.

13. Ozavci O. Dangerous Gifts. Imperialism, Security and Civil Wars in the Levant, 1798—1864. Oxford University Press, 2021.

14. Rogan E. L. Sectarianism and social conflict in Damascus: the 1860 events reconsidered // Arabica. 2004. T. LI (4). P. 493—511.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate