Knighthood and Titled Nobility in the Antiquarian Episteme of the 16th — 17th Centuries

Fyodorov, Sergey

doi:10.18254/S207987840027294-2

English

Home>Issue 7 (129)>Knighthood and Titled Nobility in the Antiquarian Episteme of the 16th — 17th Centuries

Knighthood and Titled Nobility in the Antiquarian Episteme of the 16th — 17th Centuries

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

Knighthood and Titled Nobility in the Antiquarian Episteme of the 16th — 17th Centuries

Annotation

PII

S207987840027294-2-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840027294-2

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Sergey Fyodorov Send message

Affiliation: Saint-Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Edition

Volume 14 Issue 7 (129)

Abstract

The entire complex of descriptive methods, peculiar for the 16th — 17th centuries antiquarian texts, forms a kind of episteme which characterize not only a specific world vision of individual antiquarians but also a certain form of reasoning about surrounding world. Such an episteme involves specific scheme for uncovering, classification, and subsequent interpretation of different segments of surrounding reality within a particular text or a textual corpus and broadly — within tradition. These segments were convolved, modified in particular way within a textual space and only after suchlike adaptation were presented as a verbal equivalents of fragmented reality. The antiquarian tradition finds an interest in particular forms of reality qualified for grouping within political and social rubrics and with a particular accent on cognitive mapping of power institutions and social groups. The article explores in what way a knighthood and titled nobility were described within this an episteme as two genetically interrelated social groups.

Keywords

England, 16th — 17th centuries, antiquarian discourse, episteme, knighthood, titled nobility

Источник финансирования

The article is financially supported by grant of RSF 23-28-00267 “The Rise of the Social: Social terminology and Classifications in the Early Modern Intellectual Discourse”.

Received

08.03.2023

Publication date

12.09.2023

Number of characters

46700

Number of purchasers

Views

230

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Fyodorov S. Knighthood and Titled Nobility in the Antiquarian Episteme of the 16th — 17th Centuries // ISTORIYA. – 2023. – V. 14. – Issue 7 (129). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840027294-2-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840027294-2
MLA	Fyodorov, Sergey "Knighthood and Titled Nobility in the Antiquarian Episteme of the 16th — 17th Centuries." ISTORIYA. 14.7 (129) (2023). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840027294-2
APA	Fyodorov S. (2023). Knighthood and Titled Nobility in the Antiquarian Episteme of the 16th — 17th Centuries. ISTORIYA. vol. 14, no. 7 (129) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840027294-2

Full text is available to subscribers only

Subscribe right now

Only article and additional services

Subscription benefits

200 RUB / 1.0 SU

Whole issue and additional services

Subscription benefits

820 RUB / 10.0 SU

All issues and additional services for 2023

Subscription benefits

5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Palamarchuk A. A., Fedorov S. E. Antikvarnyj diskurs v rannestyuartovskoj Anglii. SPb., 2015.

2. Fedorov S. E. Aristokratiya pri rannikh Styuartakh. 1603—1629. SPb., 2023.

3. Fyodorov S. Nobilitas in the 16th — 17th Centuries Antiquarian Discourse and Emergence of the Social // ISTORIYA. 2022. Vol. 13. Is. 6 (116). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840021843-6-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840021843-6

4. Fedorov S. E., Palamarchuk A. A. Lord Klarendon i antikvarnoe istoriopisanie // Dialog so vremenem. 2020. T. 73. S. 200—209.

5. Ascheri M. La nobiltà dell'Università medievale: nella Glossa e in Bartolo da Sassoferrato // Atti del convegno “Sapere e/è potere”. Vol. III (Dalle discipline ai ruoli sociali) / a cura di A. De Benedictis. Bologna, 1990. P. 239—268.

6. Burmeister K. H. Das Studium der Rechte im Zeitalter des Humanismus im deutschen Rechtsbereich. Wiesbaden, 1974.

7. Crisp R. Nobility in the Nicomachean Ethics // Phronesis. 2014. Vol. 59. P. 231—245.

8. Di Fonzo Cl. Dalla letteratura al diritto e ritorno: il concetto di nobilta` da Dante a Tasso passando per Bartolo // Forum Italicum. 2018. Vol. 52(1). P. 3—16.

9. Donati C. L’idea di nobiltà in Italia: secoli XIV—XVIII. Bari, 1988.

10. Duby G. The Chivalrous Society. New Haven; Los Angeles, 1984.

11. Finzi Cl. La polemica sulla nobiltà nell’Italia del Quattrocento // Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios Latinos. 2010. Vol. 30. No. 2. P. 341—380.

12. Fynlayson M. Historians, Puritanism and the English Revolution. Toronto, 1983.

13. Gilli P. La Noblesse du droit. Débats et controverses sur la culture juridique et le rôle des juristes dans l’Italie médiévale (XIIe — XVe siècles). P., 2003.

14. Kolnai A. Dignity // Philosophy. 1976. Vol. 51. P. 251—271.

15. Kosman A. Beauty and the Good: Situating the Kalon // Classical Philology. 2010. Vol. 105. No. 4. P. 341—357.

16. Robiglio A. The Thinker as a Noble Man (bene natus) and Preliminary Remarks on the Medieval Concepts of Nobility // Vivarium. 2006. Vol. 44. No. 2-3. P. 205—247.

17. Tateo F. La disputa della nobiltà // Tateo F. Tradizione e realtà dell’Umanesimo italiano. Bari, 1974. P. 355—442.

18. Tutuska J. Aristotle on the Noble and the Good: Philosophical Imprecision in the “Nicomachean Ethics” // Ancient Philosophy. 2013. Vol. 33. P. 159—179.

19. Wieacker F. Gründer und Bewahrer. Rechtslehrer der neueren deutschen Privatrechtsgeschichte. Göttingen, 1959.