Procurators of Dacia Inferior During the Reigh of Emperor Hadrian
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Procurators of Dacia Inferior During the Reigh of Emperor Hadrian
Annotation
PII
S207987840024675-1-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Nikita Filimonov 
Affiliation: Demidov Yaroslavl State University
Address: Russian Federation, Yaroslavl
Abstract

The article examines the official path of the procurators of Dacia Inferior during the reign of Hadrian on the basis of epigraphic materials, specifies the dates of their stay in the province. Also, the epigraphy data on the investigated procurators reflect only part of their direct responsibilities in the province. It is concluded that in the 20—30s of the 2nd century AD the procurators of Dacia Inferior, upon reaching the end of their term of office, held similar posts in other provinces, but by the 60s of the 2nd century AD, due to the personnel crisis in the highest level of the administrative system of the Roman Empire, the career opportunities of equites are expanding up to the most important government posts.

Keywords
Roman Empire, Dacia Inferior, provincial administration, procuratores, 117—138 AD
Received
04.12.2022
Publication date
15.03.2023
Number of characters
24875
Number of purchasers
15
Views
214
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2023

References

1. Kolosovskaya Yu. K. Rimskij namestnik i ego rol' vo vneshnepoliticheskoj istorii Dakii. // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1988. № 4. C. 20—36.

2. Popov M. V. Legiony rimskoj provintsii Dakii // Problemy istorii, filologii, kul'tury. 2002. № 12. S. 162—174.

3. Serdyukova S. G. Politicheskaya ehlita ehpokhi Antoninov // Mnemon. Issledovaniya i publikatsii po istorii antichnogo mira. 2003. № 2. C. 241—256.

4. Smyshlyaev A. L. Ob ehvolyutsii kantselyarskogo personala Rimskoj imperii v III v. n. eh. // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 1979. № 3. S. 60—81.

5. Calasanza J., Camesina A. Zwölf römische Militär-Diplome. Wien: Rohrmann, 1843.

6. Camodeca, G. La carriera del prefetto del pretorio Sex.Cornelius Repentinus in una nuova iscrizioneputeolana // Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik. 1981. Bd. 43. S. 43—56.

7. Cases Mora N. La guerra de Tacfarinas (17—24 D.C.): balance historiografico y nuevas perspectivas sobre las causas de su estallido. // Studia Historica: Historia Antigua. 2019. Vol. 37. P. 31—61.

8. Dessau H. Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae. Vol. III. Pars. II. Berolini: Apud Weidmannos, 1916.

9. Dise R. L. The beneficiarii procuratoris of Celeia and the development of the statio network // Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik. 1996. Bd. 113. S. 286—292.

10. Eck W., Pangerl A. Eine Konstitution für die Truppen von Dacia inferior vom 16. Juni 123 unter dem Präsidialprokurator Cocceius Naso und weitere diplomata militaria // Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik. 2015. Bd. 195. S. 231—242.

11. Eck W., Pangerl A. Neue Diplome für die dakischen Provinzen // Acta Musei Napocensis. 2006—2007. Nr. 43-44. P. 185—210.

12. Fink R. O. Hunt's Pridianum: British Museum Papyrus 2851 // The Journal of Roman Studies. 1958. Vol. 48/1. P. 102—116.

13. Firz J. Die Reichsbeamten von Noricum und ihr Personal bis zum Ende der römischen Herrschaft by Gerhard Winkler // Latomus. 1972. T. 31/1. P. 260—262.

14. Giannakopoulos N. The Gerousia of Akmonia // Gephyra. Journal for the Ancient History and Cultures of the Eastern Mediterranean. 2013. Vol. 10. P. 13—31.

15. Ilkić M. 2009: Rimska vojna diploma iz Podgrađa (Asseria) // Vjesnik za arheologiju i povijest dalmatinsku. Vol. 102. № 1. P. 59—73.

16. Lauriani A. T. Schneller Ueberblick der Geschichte der Romänen. București: Imprimerie di College National, 1846.

17. Magioncalda A. I procuratori-governatori delle due Mauretaniae: aggiornamenti (1989—2004) e nuove ipotesi. // L'Africa romana: Mobilita delle persone e dei popoli, dinamiche migratorie, emigrazioni ed immigrazioni nelle province occidentali dell'Impero romano. Atti del XVI convegno di studio. Rabat, 15—19 dicembre 2004 / ed. A. Akerraz, P. Ruggeri, A. Siraj, C. Vismara. Roma: Carocci editore, 2006. Vol. 3. P. 1737—1757.

18. Matei-Popescu F. Auxiliaria (II). Near and Beyond the Roman Frontier. Proceedings of a colloquim held in Târgovişte. 16—17 October. Bucureşti: Centre of the Roman Military Studies, 2009. P. 339—346.

19. Matei-Popescu, F., Țentea, O. The Eastern Frontier of Dacia. A Gazetteer of the Forts and Units. // Orbis Romanus and Barbaricum. The Barbarians around the Province of Dacia and Their Relations with the Roman Empire. Ch. 1. Cluj-Napoca: Mega Publishing House, 2016. P. 7—24.

20. Petolescu C. C. Dacia: Un Mileniu De Istorie. Bucureşti: Editura Academiei Romane, 2010.

21. Piso I. Ti. Claudius Constans, procurateur de Dacie inférieure et de Maurétanie Césarienne // Acta Musei Napocensis. 2000. Nr. 37/1. P. 231—242.

22. Reuter M. Studien zu den Numeri des römischen Heeres in der mittleren Kaiserzeit // Bericht der Römisch-Germanisch Kommission. 1999. Bd. 80. S. 467—469.

23. Rossignol B. Les préfets du prétoire de Marc Aurèle // Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz. 2007. Vol. 18. P. 141—177.

24. Saddington D. B. Roman soldiers, local gods and interpretatio Romana in Roman Germany // Acta Classica: Proceedings of the Classical Association of South Africa. 1999. Vol. 42/1. P. 155—169.

25. Syme R. The Wrong Marcius Turbo. // The Journal of Roman Studies. 1962. Vol. 52. 1-2. P. 87—96.

26. Ţentea O., Popa A. Castrul și băile romane de la Hoghiz — rezultatele recente ale prospecțiunilor geofizice // Cercetări Arheologice. 2017. Nr. 24. P. 135—141.

27. Thonemann R. The women of Akmoneia // The Journal of Roman Studies. 2010. Vol. 100. P. 163—178.

28. Visočnik J. Foreigners in the area of Celeia // Classica et Christiana. 2014. Vol. 9/1. P. 275—298.

29. Weiß P. Neue Diplome für Soldaten des Exercitus Dacicus // Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik. 2002. Bd. 141. S. 241—251.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate