Medieval Studies in the Ocean of Translation. On the Literal and the Correct

Yusim, Mark

doi:10.18254/S207987840023111-1

English

Home>Issue 11 (121)>Medieval Studies in the Ocean of Translation. On the Literal and the Correct

Medieval Studies in the Ocean of Translation. On the Literal and the Correct

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

Medieval Studies in the Ocean of Translation. On the Literal and the Correct

Annotation

PII

S207987840023111-1-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840023111-1

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Mark Yusim Send message

Affiliation: Institute of World History RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Edition

Volume 13 Issue 11 (121)

Abstract

Do historians think? Do translators think? Do they have to think? It seems to be a rhetorical question: of course, people of intellectual labor think (reflect) because it is their professional duty. But the word “think”, like many other words, has different shades of meaning. However, it always implies reflection, doubt, and comparing different options. Nevertheless, it is one thing to think within the established professional schemes and tasks: for a historian it is how better to reproduce the events of the past and their meaning, for a translator it is how better and more accurately to transmit the original text. The creative element in both cases is secondary and limited. It is another thing to question the very schemes and stereotypes that have been worked out, to try to make sense of them anew. Reflection on beginnings is useful for any intellectual activity and constitutes, if not the main, then a very important part of it, so here I list in theses form a number of problems of historical research, primarily in medieval studies, related to one or another type of translation, since the work of the historian and the translator are closely connected.

Keywords

Medieval Studies, translations, history, philology, language, terms, definitions, unambiguity

Received

18.11.2022

Publication date

15.12.2022

Number of characters

38477

Number of purchasers

Views

288

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Yusim M. Medieval Studies in the Ocean of Translation. On the Literal and the Correct // ISTORIYA. – 2022. – V. 13. – Issue 11 (121). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840023111-1-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840023111-1
MLA	Yusim, Mark "Medieval Studies in the Ocean of Translation. On the Literal and the Correct." ISTORIYA. 13.11 (121) (2022). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840023111-1
APA	Yusim M. (2022). Medieval Studies in the Ocean of Translation. On the Literal and the Correct. ISTORIYA. vol. 13, no. 11 (121) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840023111-1

Full text is available to subscribers only

Subscribe right now

Only article and additional services

Subscription benefits

200 RUB / 1.0 SU

Whole issue and additional services

Subscription benefits

820 RUB / 10.0 SU

All issues and additional services for 2022

Subscription benefits

5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Alekseeva I. S. Vvedenie v perevodovedenie. M., 2004.

2. Arapova G. U. Kontsept, ponyatie i znachenie slova // Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental'nykh issledovanij. 2016. № 1-4. S. 591—593.

3. Gilyarevskij R. S., Starostin B. A. Inostrannye imena i nazvaniya v russkom tekste. Spravochnik. M., 1969.

4. Gurevich A. Ya. Srednevekovaya literatura i ee sovremennoe vospriyatie: o perevode «Pesni o Nibelungakh». Prostranstvenno-vremennoj kontinuum «Pesni o Nibelungakh» // Istoriya — neskonchaemyj spor. M., 2006. S. 118—138, 276—314.

5. Dekart R. Pravila dlya rukovodstva uma. Pravilo XIII / per. s latinskogo M. A. Garntseva // Dekart R. Sochineniya v 2 t. T. 1. M., 1989.

6. Ermolovich D. I. Imena sobstvennye: Teoriya i praktika mezh'yazykovoj peredachi: s prilozheniem pravil prakticheskoj peredachi imen i nazvanij s 26 evropejskikh i vostochnykh yazykov. M., 2005.

7. Kaganovich B. S. Evgenij Viktorovich Tarle. Istorik i vremya. SPb., 2014.

8. Komissarov V. N. Sovremennoe perevodovedenie. M., 2014.

9. Levina M. A. Termin, ponyatie i kontsept // Privolzhskij nauchnyj vestnik. 2014. № 6 (34). C. 106—108.

10. Lidin R. A. Inostrannye familii i lichnye imena. Praktika transkriptsii na russkij yazyk. Spravochnik. M., 2006.

11. Likhomanov K. V. Perevod srednevekovogo teksta kak problema sotsial'noj i kul'turnoj istorii (vzglyad A. Ya. Gurevicha) // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2015. № 2-1. URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=21409 (data obrascheniya: 23.06.2022).

12. Osnovnye ponyatiya perevodovedeniya (Otechestvennyj opyt). Terminologicheskij slovar'-spravochnik / otv. red. M. B. Rarenko. M., 2010.

13. Prunch Eh. Puti razvitiya zapadnogo perevodovedeniya. Ot yazykovoj asimmetrii k politicheskoj / per. s nem. pod red. N. I. Rejngol'd. M., 2015.

14. Pushkin A. S. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: V 16 t. M.; L., 1937—1959. T. 2. Stikhotvoreniya, 1817—1825. Litsejskie stikhotvoreniya v pozdnejshikh redaktsiyakh. M.; L., 1947. S. 464. T. 11. Kritika i publitsistika, 1819—1834. 1949. S. 283—526.

15. Rossel's V. M. Zaboty perevodchika klassiki // Tetradi perevodchika. Vyp. 4. M., 1967. S. 23—34.

16. Tarle E. V. Rossiya i Zapad: Iz neopublikovannogo i zabytogo / sost., podgot. k pechati, vstup. stat'ya i komment. B. S. Kaganovicha. SPb, 2020.

17. Fejnberg I. L. Nezavershennye raboty Pushkina. 7-e izd. M., 1979.

18. Chukovskij K. I. Vysokoe iskusstvo // Sobranie sochinenij v 15 t. T. 3. M., 2012.

19. Yusim M. A. Iskusstvo perevoda i istoriya // Iskusstvovedenie v kontekste drugikh nauk v sovremennom mire. Paralleli i vzaimodejstviya. Sbornik trudov Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferentsii. 21—26 aprelya 2019 g. M., 2020. S. 625—633.

20. Descartes R. Règles pour la direction de l’esprit. Œuvres. T. XI. P., 1826.