Historic Changes in Copyright: From Absolute Monopoly to Complete Denial (Copyleft)
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Historic Changes in Copyright: From Absolute Monopoly to Complete Denial (Copyleft)
Annotation
PII
S207987840022916-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Natalia Sherbak 
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

In the 21st century, intellectual copyrights face new challenges caused by the emergence of new information technologies and the new results of intellectual activity generated by them. The conditions for creating, using the results of intellectual activity and disposing of exclusive rights to them are rapidly changing, taking into account the intensive development of robotics, artificial intelligence, and the complexity of the Internet space. In his article, the author proposes to critically comprehend and analyze the history of copyright through the study of philosophical justifications, theoretical doctrines and to trace the main trends of the evolutionary path of development of this institution: from the granting of privileges to its complete denial in connection with the rapid development of the Internet and the emergence of “free licenses”.

Keywords
the rule of the copyright holder, copyright monopoly, the Venetian Patent Law, the Statute of Queen Anne, exclusive right, related rights, open licenses, copyright, copyleft
Received
16.04.2022
Publication date
07.11.2022
Number of characters
61024
Number of purchasers
11
Views
494
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2022

References

1. Vorozhevich A. S. Vyzovy sovremennym patentnym sistemam i pravovye otvety na nikh // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2014. № 2. T. 14.

2. Vojnikanis E. A. Pravo intellektual'noj sobstvennosti v tsifrovuyu ehpokhu: paradigma balansa i gibkosti. M.: Yurisprudentsiya, 2013.

3. Vorozhevich A. S. Granitsy i predely osuschestvleniya avtorskikh i smezhnykh prav. M.: Statut, 2020.

4. Grazhdanskoe pravo sotsial'nogo gosudarstva: Sbornik statej, posvyaschennyj 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya professora A. L. Makovskogo (1930—2020) / otv. red. Vitryanskij V. V., Sukhanov E. A. M.: Statut, 2020.

5. Gordon M. V. Sovetskoe avtorskoe pravo. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1955.

6. Dyuma R. Literaturnaya i khudozhestvennaya sobstvennost'. Avtorskoe pravo Frantsii. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1989.

7. Em V. S., Yatsenko T. S. Funktsional'noe naznachenie i sfera primeneniya printsipa solidarnosti v grazhdanskom prave // Vestnik grazhdanskogo prava. 2018. № 6. S. 9—29.

8. Zenin I. A. Zarozhdenie i razvitie instituta smezhnykh prav v Rossijskoj Federatsii // Zenin I. A. Problemy rossijskogo prava intellektual'noj sobstvennosti (izbrannye trudy). M.: Statut, 2015. S. 179—185.

9. Zenin I. A. Smezhnye prava i ikh granitsy // Grazhdanskoe pravo: v 4 t. / otv. red. Sukhanov E. A. T. II. M.: Volters Kluver, 2005.

10. Zil'bershtejn N. L. Avtorskoe pravo na muzykal'nye proizvedeniya. M.: Sovetskij kompozitor, 1960.

11. Ionas V. Ya. Proizvedeniya tvorchestva v grazhdanskom prave. M.: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1972.

12. Kashanin A. V. Razvitie mekhanizma demarkatsii v avtorskom prave kontinental'noj Evropy // Vestnik Grazhdanskogo prava. 2011. № 3. T. 11. S. 61—101.

13. Kulagin M. I. Izbrannye trudy po aktsionernomu i torgovomu pravu (Klassika rossijskoj tsivilistiki. M.: Statut, 2004.

14. Liptsik D. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye prava. M.: YuNESKO, 2002.

15. Lokk Dzh. Dva traktata o pravlenii // Lokk Dzh. Sochineniya: V 3 t. T. 3. M.: Mysl', 1988.

16. Matveev A. G. Sistema avtorskikh prav v Rossii: normativnye akty i teoreticheskie modeli. Dissertatsiya doktora yuridicheskikh nauk. M., 2016.

17. Matveev A. G. Osnovnye vzglyady i teorii, kritikuyuschie avtorskoe pravo // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. 2010. Vyp. 3. C. 120—127.

18. Matveev A. G. Sistema avtorskikh prav v Rossii: normativnye i teoreticheskie modeli: avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie stepeni doktora yuridicheskikh nauk. M., 2016.

19. Matveev A. G., Sinel'nikova V. N. Ob'ekty intellektual'noj sobstvennosti, poluchayuschie okhranu v XXI v. // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki. 2019. Vyp. 2. Aprel'—iyun'. S. 281—309.

20. Evropejskoe pravo intellektual'noj sobstvennosti: osnovnye akty Evropejskogo soyuza / red. Pavlova E. A. M.: Statut, 2016.

21. Pilenko A. Pravo izobretatelya. T. 2. SPb.: Tipografiya M. M. Stasyulevicha, 1902—1903.

22. Sergeev A. P. Pravo intellektual'noj sobstvennosti v Rossijskoj Federatsii. M.: TOO «TEIS», 1996.

23. Serebrovskij V. I. Voprosy sovetskogo avtorskogo prava. M: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1956.

24. Kniga. Issledovaniya i materialy. Sbornik XXIX / red. Sikorskij N. M. M.: Kniga, 1974.

25. Stremetskaya N. L. Vzaimosvyaz' avtorskogo prava i smezhnykh prav // Zakonodatel'stvo. 2002. № 8.

26. Sherstobitov A. E. Modernizatsiya GK RF v sfere obyazatel'stvennogo prava: kontseptual'nye podkhody i ikh realizatsiya // Grazhdanskoe pravo sotsial'nogo gosudarstva: Sbornik statej, posvyaschennyj 90-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya professora A. L. Makovskogo (1930—2020) / otv. red. Vitryanskij V. V., Sukhanov E. A. M.: Statut, 2020. S. 323—348.

27. Shershenevich G. F. Avtorskoe pravo na literaturnye proizvedeniya. M.: Statut, 2017.

28. Kharitonov V. Kopirajt protiv buduschego // Union magazine. Zhurnal o buduschem. 2021. № 1. S. 92—93.

29. Diderot D. Letter on the book trade. P., 1763.

30. Fichte J. Beweis der Unrechtmäßigkeit des Büchernachdrucks // Berliner Monatsschrift. 1793. Mai. S. 443—482.

31. Hargrave F. Argument in Defence of Literary Property. L., 1774.

32. Kostylo J. From Gunpowder to Print: The Common Origins of Copyright and Patent // Cambridge: Privilege and property: essays on the history of copyright / ed. Deazley R., Kretschmer M., Bently L. Open Book Publishers, 2010. P. 21—51.

33. Patry W. How to fix copyright. N. Y.: Oxford University press, 2011.

34. Piotraut J. - L. An authors rights-based copyright law: the fairness and morality of French and American Law Compared // Cardozo Art and Entertainment. 2006. Vol. 24. Is. 2. P. 549—616 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: URL://http://www.cardozoaelj.net/issues/07/Piotraut.pdf (data obrascheniya 05.07.2022)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate