Science Diplomacy: Theory and Practice

Chubaryan, Alexander; Zabotkina, Vera; Griset, Pascal; Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno

doi:10.18254/S207987840018743-6

English

Home>Issue 12 (110). Part 2>Science Diplomacy: Theory and Practice

Science Diplomacy: Theory and Practice

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

Science Diplomacy: Theory and Practice

Annotation

PII

S207987840018743-6-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840018743-6

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Alexander Chubaryan Send message

Affiliation: Institute of World History RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Vera Zabotkina

Affiliation: Russian State University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Pascal Griset

Affiliation: Sorbonne University
Address: France, Paris

Pierre-Bruno Ruffini

Affiliation: University of Le Havre
Address: France, Le Havre

Edition

Volume 12 Issue 12 (110). Part 2

Abstract

Since 2021, within the framework of an agreement between the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the House of Human Sciences Foundation (Paris, France), a joint Russian-French project has been implemented aimed at studying the phenomenon of science diplomacy in the modern world, its role in overcoming contradictions between states and the establishment of peace among peoples. The project aims to analyze the various practices of science diplomacy in the key periods of history, to compare the experience of different countries. In the article, several participants of the project formulate their idea of the phenomenon of science diplomacy. Professor of the University of Le Havre (France) P.-B. Ruffini focuses on the main aspects of science diplomacy, characterizing it as an innovative concept of the 21st century, able to withstand global challenges, and showing that science diplomacy is a phenomenon much wider than the cooperation of scientists from around the world. Scientific director of the Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Academician Alexander Chubaryan writes about the significant Russian contribution to the development of science diplomacy, drawing on various examples from the field of humanitarian cooperation. Professor of the Sorbonne P. Griset, using the example of Soviet-French cooperation during the Cold War, shows the mechanism for the practical implementation of the elements of science diplomacy in life. Professor of the Russian State University for the Humanities Vera Zabotkina touches upon the topic of the cognitive dimension of science diplomacy, one of the most promising components of modern science.

Keywords

Russia, France, Cold War, scientific cooperation, scientific diplomacy, intercultural dialogue, communication

Источник финансирования

The article was prepared with the financial support of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project No. 21-59-22010 FDNCH_A “The role of scientific diplomacy in the face of crises and threats”. On the French side, the text was prepared with the financial support of the House Foundation Human Sciences (Foundation Maison des Sciences de l’Homme). On the French side, the text was also prepared with the financial support of the project “InsSciDE”. InsScide has received funding under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement № 770523).

Received

26.09.2021

Publication date

27.12.2021

Number of characters

79600

Number of purchasers

Views

1023

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Chubaryan A., Griset P., Ruffini P., Zabotkina V. Science Diplomacy: Theory and Practice // ISTORIYA. – 2021. – V. 12. – Issue 12 (110). Part 2. URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840018743-6-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840018743-6
MLA	Chubaryan, Alexander, Griset, Pascal, Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno, Zabotkina, Vera "Science Diplomacy: Theory and Practice." ISTORIYA. 12.12-2 (110) (2021). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840018743-6
APA	Chubaryan A., Griset P., Ruffini P., Zabotkina V. (2021). Science Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. ISTORIYA. vol. 12, no. 12-2 (110) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840018743-6

Full text is available to subscribers only

Subscribe right now

Only article and additional services

Subscription benefits

200 RUB / 1.0 SU

Whole issue and additional services

Subscription benefits

820 RUB / 10.0 SU

All issues and additional services for 2021

Subscription benefits

5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Bakhtin M. M. Problemy poehtiki Dostoevskogo. Izd. tret'e. M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1972. S. 147.

2. Zabotkina V. I. V chetyrekhmernom prostranstve yazyka i kul'tury // Kritika i semiotika. 2021. № 1. S. 9—21.

3. Zabotkina V. I. K voprosu o sootnoshenii kognitsii i ehmotsii v protsesse kontseptualizatsii: mezhdistsiplinarnyj podkhod // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2018. № 35. S. 31—37.

4. Zabotkina V. I. Kognitivnye mekhanizmy mezhkul'turnogo dialoga // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2020. № 2 (41). S. 76—80.

5. Zabotkina V. I. Kognitivnye mekhanizmy perevoda // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2021. № 3 (46). C. 40—44.

6. Zabotkina V. I. Mezhkul'turnaya kommunikatsiya: mental'nye struktury i kognitivnye mekhanizmy // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. 2021. Vyp. 2 (45). C. 166—171.

7. Zabotkina V. I., Konnova M. N. K voprosu o tsennostyakh i antitsennostyakh v avtorskoj kartine mira B. L. Pasternaka (na materiale stikhotvoreniya «Byt' znamenitym nekrasivo») // Novyj filologicheskij vestnik. M.: RGGU, 2017. № 3 (42). S. 160—171.

8. Iriskhanova O. K. Perekategorizatsiya v diskurse kak sposob povysheniya novostnogo statusa sobytiya // Kognitivnye issledovaniya yazyka. Vyp. 24. 2016. S. 341—354.

9. Osipov E. Franco-Soviet SECAM: from Ambitious Plans to Reality (Based on the Materials of the French Foreign Ministry Archives) // ISTORIYA. 2021. Vol. 12. Issue 11 (109). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840017637-9-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840017637-9

10. Stepanov Yu. S. V trekhmernom prostranstve yazyka. M.: Progress, 1985.

11. Frantsuzy v nauchnoj i intellektual'noj zhizni Rossii XVIII—XX vv. / otv. red. Chubar'yan A. O., Lishtenan F.-D., sost. Okuneva O. V. M.: OLMA Media Grupp, 2010.

12. Frantsuzy v nauchnoj i intellektual'noj zhizni Rossii KhIKh v. = Les Français dans la vie intellectuelle et scientifique en Russie au XIXe siècle / In-t vseobschej istorii RAN; pod red. Chubar'yana A. O., Lishtenan F.-D., Rzheutskogo V. S., Okunevoj O. V. M.: IVI RAN, 2013.

13. Frantsuzy v nauchnoj i intellektual'noj zhizni SSSR v KhKh v. = Les Français dans la vie intellectuelle et scientifique en URSS au XXe siècle / In-t vseobschej istorii RAN, pod red. Chubar'yana A. O., Lishtenan F.-D., Kyore S., Okunevoj O. V. M.: IVI RAN, 2013.

14. Aoyagi M. Selection of Japanese categories during social interaction // Language and the Cognitive Construal ot'lhe World / ed. by Taylor J. R., MacLaury R. E. Berlin: Mouton de Gruytcr, 1995. P. 331—364.

15. Barsalou L. Ad hoc categories // Memory and Cognition. 11.1983. P. 211—227.

16. Carrère d’Encausse H. La Russie et la France, de Pierre le Grand à Lénine. P.: Fayard, 2019.

17. Copeland D. Science Diplomacy / ed. Constantinou C. M., Kerr P., Sharp P. The SAGE Handbook of Diplomacy. L.: SAGE, 2016. P. 628—641

18. Couve de Murville M. Lettre au sujet des attachés scientifiques, Paris, le 21 mars 1963. P. 1 // Archives diplomatiques — Centre de La Courneuve. Direction générale des relations culturelles, scientifiques et techniques Enseignement 1941—1969, URSS, 220: Personnel — Attaché et conseiller scientifiques (1961—1966), FRMAE 239QO.

19. Damasio A. R. Self comes to mind: Constricting the conscious mind. N. Y.: Pantheon Books, 2010.

20. Damasio A. R. The feeling of what happens: Body and emotions in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace., 1999.

21. Dancygier V., Lu. W., Varhagen A. Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: form and use of viewpoint tools across language and modalities. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2016.

22. Dancygier V., Sweetser E. Negation, stance verbs, and intersubjectivity/ Viewpoint in language: a multimodal persprctive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. P. 69—93.

23. Davieau-Pousset S. Maurice Dejean, diplomate atypique (1899-1982). Thèse de doctorat, soutenue sous la direction de Maurice Vaïsse. Institut d’études politiques de Paris, 2013.

24. Davieau-Pousset S. Maurice Dejean, diplomate atypique // Relations internationales. 2015. Vol. 162. P. 80 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://doi-org.inshs.bib.cnrs.fr/10.3917/ri.162.0079

25. Dejean M. Lettre. Moscou, le 26 janvier 1961 // Archives diplomatiques - Centre de La Courneuve. Direction générale des relations culturelles, scientifiques et techniques Enseignement 1941—1969, URSS, 220: Personnel — Attaché et conseiller scientifiques (1961—1966), FRMAE 239QO.

26. Dejean M. Note au sujet de conseiller scientifique auprès de l’ambassade. Moscou, 5 janvier 1961. P. 1 // Archives diplomatiques — Centre de La Courneuve. Direction générale des relations culturelles, scientifiques et techniques. Enseignement 1941—1969, URSS, 220: Personnel — Attaché et conseiller scientifiques (1961—1966), FRMAE 239QO.

27. Ekman P. Emotions revealed: Understanding faces and feelings. Phoenix: Phoenix Press, 2004.

28. European Commission. Enhancing and focusing EU international cooperation in research and innovation: A strategic approach. // COM (2012) 497 final. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://ec.europa.eu/research/iscp/pdf/policy/com_2012_497_communication_from_commission_to_inst_en.pdf

29. Fauconnier G. Pragmatics and Cognitive Linguistics // The Handbook of pragmatics / ed. by Horn L. R., Ward G. Oxford, 2004.

30. Fedoroff N. Science Diplomacy in the 21st Century // Cell. 2009. Vol. 136 (1). P. 9—11.

31. Flink T., Schreiterer U. Science diplomacy at the intersection of S&T policies and foreign affairs: toward a typology of national approaches // Science and Public Policy. 2010. Vol. 37 (9). P. 665—677.

32. Gluckman P. D., Turekian V. C., Grimes R. W., Kishi T. Science Diplomacy: A Pragmatic Perspective from the Inside // Science & Diplomacy. 2017. Vol. 6 (4). P. 1—13.

33. Gobierno de España. Report on Science, Technology and Innovation Diplomacy. Madrid, 2016.

34. Griset P. Innovation Diplomacy: A New Concept for Ancient Practices? // The Hague Journal of Diplomacy. 2020. Vol. 15(3). P. 383—397.

35. Hocking B., Melissen J., Riordan S., Sharp P. Futures for Diplomacy — Integrative Diplomacy in the 21st Century. Netherland Institute of International Relations “Clingendael”, 2012 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.clingendael.org/publication/futures-diplomacy-integrative-diplomacy-21st-century

36. Iser W. On Translatability: Variables of Interpretation. // The European English Messenger. 1995. V. 4(1): P. 30-38.

37. Krige J., Barth K. H. Introduction: Science, Technology, and International Affairs // Osiris. 2006. Vol. 21 (1). P. 1—21.

38. Laloy J. À Moscou : entre Staline et de Gaulle, décembre 1944 // Revue des études slaves. 1982. Tome 54. Fascicule 1-2. P. 137—152.

39. Le Doux D. The emotional brain. N. Y.: Simon and Schuster, 1996.

40. Lord K. M., Turekian V. C. Time for a New Era of Science Diplomacy // Science. 2007. № 315 (5813). P. 769 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1139880

41. MacLaury R. E. Coextensive semantic ranges: different names for distinct vantages of one category // CLS. 1987. 23/1. P. 268—282.

42. MacLaury R. E. Vantage theory // Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World / ed. by Taylor J. R., MacLaury R. E. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1995. P. 231—276.

43. Mazuy R. La Décade Scientifique Franco-Soviétique de 1934 // Cahiers du monde russe. 2002. Vol. 43. № 2/3. P. 441—448 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20174680

44. Merton R. K. The Normative Structure of Science (1942) // Merton R. K. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973. P. 267—278.

45. Ministère des Affaires étrangères. Une diplomatie scientifique pour la France. Paris, Direction générale de la mondialisation, du développement et des partenariats. 2013.

46. Nye J. Soft Power — The Means to Success in World Politics. N. Y.: Basic Books, 2004.

47. Penca J. The Rhetoric of “Science Diplomacy”: Innovation for the EU’s Scientific Cooperation?’ // EL-CSID Working Paper №. 16. Brussels: Institute for European Studies, 2018.

48. Rey M.-P. La Russie face à l'Europe : d'Ivan le Terrible à Vladimir Poutine. P.: Flammarion, 2016.

49. Royal Society and American Association for the Advancement of Science. New Frontiers in Science Diplomacy. L.: Royal Society, 2010.

50. Ruffini P.-B. Science and Diplomacy: A New Dimension of International Relations. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017.

51. Schweitzer G. E. Techno-Diplomacy: US-Soviet Confrontations in Science and Technology. N. Y.: Plenum, 1989.

52. Severi C., Hanks W. Introduction // Translating worlds. The epistemological Space of Translation / ed. by Severi C., Hanks W. F. 2015.

53. Skolnikoff E. The Elusive Transformation: Science, Technology, and the Evolution of International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.

54. Smith M. S. Introducing Language and Cognition: a Map of the Mind / Mike Sharwood Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

55. Smith, M. Mechanisms of the Mind. In Introducing Language and Cognition: A Map of the Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.

56. Sunami A., Hamachi T., Kitaba S. The Rise of Science and Technology Diplomacy in Japan // Science & Diplomacy. 2013. Vol. 2 (1) [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/article/2013/rise-science-and-technology-diplomacy-in-japan (data obrascheniya: 22.10.2020).

57. Taton R. Sur l'histoire des relations scientifiques franco-russes // Revue d’Histoire des Sciences. 1970. Vol. 23-3. P. 257—264.

58. Tiffeneau M. Notice nécrologique de M. Jean Cantacuzène (de Bucarest), associé étranger // Bulletin d’Académie nationale de médicine. 1934. Vol. 111. № 24. P. 885—904.

59. Turekian V. C., Neureiter N. P. Science and Diplomacy: The Past as Prologue // Science & Diplomacy. 2012. Vol. 1(1). S.p [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.sciencediplomacy.org/sites/default/files/science_and_diplomacy.pdf

60. Velichkovsky B., Nedoluzhko A., Goldberg E., Efimova O., Sharko F., Rastorguev S., Krasivskaya A., Sharaev M., Korosteleva A., Ushakov V. New Insights into the Human Brain’s Cognitive Organization: Views from the Top, from the Bottom, from the Left and, particularly, from the Right // Procedia Computer Science. 2020. Vol. 169. P. 547—557.

61. Weiss C. Science, Technology and International Relations // Technology in Society. 2005. Vol. 27 (3). P. 295—313.

62. Zajonc R. B. Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect / ed. Forgas J. P. Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 2000. P. 31—58.