What Was Said and Not Said in the Structure of Late Imperial and Early Soviet Wills

Tarasyutina, Evgenia

doi:10.18254/S207987840018236-8

English

Home>Issue 12 (110). Part 1>What Was Said and Not Said in the Structure of Late Imperial and Early Soviet Wills

What Was Said and Not Said in the Structure of Late Imperial and Early Soviet Wills

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

What Was Said and Not Said in the Structure of Late Imperial and Early Soviet Wills

Annotation

PII

S207987840018236-8-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840018236-8

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Evgenia Tarasyutina Send message

Affiliation: State Academic University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Edition

Volume 12 Issue 12 (110). Part 1

Abstract

The Soviet legal system, which included both basic decrees and a large volume of complementary decrees and circulars, rebuilt the outdated imperial legislation, which still did not lose its legitimacy to the full extent. Transition to a New Economic Policy and creation of a complete legislative framework (including the Civil Code 1922) made possible the work of notaries and the development of the institution of inheritance. The will was a clear legal act, but within it its own structure developed, which depended on the different social roles of the one who left the will. In the 1920s, the continuity of structures in wills was preserved, which, in the early Soviet era, ensured the flexibility of law enforcement.

Keywords

notary, NEP, wills, Russian Empire, USSR, civil code, reforms, history of everyday life

Источник финансирования

The article is prepared at the State Academic University for the Humanities within the state assignment of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russian Federation. Theme № FZNF-2020-0001 “Historical and cultural traditions and values in the context of global history”.

Received

14.09.2021

Publication date

27.12.2021

Number of characters

29912

Number of purchasers

Views

709

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Tarasyutina E. What Was Said and Not Said in the Structure of Late Imperial and Early Soviet Wills // ISTORIYA. – 2021. – V. 12. – Issue 12 (110). Part 1. URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840018236-8-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840018236-8
MLA	Tarasyutina, Evgenia "What Was Said and Not Said in the Structure of Late Imperial and Early Soviet Wills." ISTORIYA. 12.12-1 (110) (2021). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840018236-8
APA	Tarasyutina E. (2021). What Was Said and Not Said in the Structure of Late Imperial and Early Soviet Wills. ISTORIYA. vol. 12, no. 12-1 (110) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840018236-8

Full text is available to subscribers only

Subscribe right now

Only article and additional services

Subscription benefits

200 RUB / 1.0 SU

Whole issue and additional services

Subscription benefits

820 RUB / 10.0 SU

All issues and additional services for 2021

Subscription benefits

5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Bajburin A. K predystorii sovetskogo pasporta (1917—1932) // Neprikosnovennyj zapas. 2009. № 2 (64).

2. Vakhromeeva O. B. Praktika nasledovaniya dlya zhenschin v dorevolyutsionnoj Rossii // Aktual'nye problemy gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk. 2016. № 1-1.

3. G. S. Po povodu dekreta o nasledovanii // Ezhenedel'nik sovetskoj yustitsii. 1922. № 14—15

4. Zagorskij G. N. Pravovaya politika drevnerusskogo i rossijskogo gosudarstva v sfere reglamentatsii poryadka oformleniya zaveschaniya. Stavropol', 2012.

5. Iogansen A. A. Dogovory i sdelki. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo s primernymi obraztsami. M.; L., 1926. Vyp. 1.

6. Kozlova N., Lifanova N. Historical Background and Modern Status of Joint (Mutual) Wills // ISTORIYA. 2020. Vol. 11. Issue 8 (94). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840011060-5-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840011060-5

7. Komarov N. I. Notariat v Rossijskoj imperii vo vtoroj polovine XIX — nachale XX v.: Istoriko-pravovoe issledovanie. M. 2004.

8. Komarevtseva I. A. Ehvolyutsiya formy zaveschaniya v drevnerusskom i rossijskom prave X—XXI vv. Stavropol', 2005.

9. Kosheleva O. E. Smert': ehmotsional'nyj podtekst zaveschanij i perepiski russkogo boyarstva XVII v. // Chelovek i ego blizkie na Zapade i Vostoke Evropy. M., 2000.

10. Logunov S. Polozhenie o gosudarstvennom notariate//Ezhenedel'nik sovetskoj yustitsii. 1923. № 19. S. 438.

11. Lozman E. O zaveschatel'noj svobode // Ezhenedel'nik sovetskoj yustitsii. 1922. № 26—27.

12. Pakhman S. V. Obychnoe grazhdanskoe pravo v Rossii: Yuridicheskie ocherki. Tom II: Semejnye prava, nasledstvo i opeka. SPb., 1879.

13. Pravo i pravoprimenenie v zerkale sotsial'nykh nauk: khrestomatiya sovremennykh tekstov / pod red. Eh. L. Paneyakh. M., 2014.

14. Rudnev L. I. O dukhovnykh zaveschaniyakh po Russkomu Grazhdanskomu Pravu v istoricheskom razvitii. Kiev, 1894.

15. Silbi S. S., Ehvik P. Obyknovennoe pravo: istorii iz povsednevnoj zhizni. Chast' tret'ya // Pravo i pravoprimenenie v zerkale sotsial'nykh nauk: khrestomatiya sovremennykh tekstov. M., 2014. S. 221—245.

16. Sehrron K., Manger F. Pravo i neravenstvo: rasa, gender…i razumeetsya klass // Pravo i pravoprimenenie v zerkale sotsial'nykh nauk: khrestomatiya sovremennykh tekstov. M., 2014

17. Tarasyutina E. Practices of Notarial System and Mechanisms Inheritance Law in the 1920s in USSR // ISTORIYA. 2020. Vol. 11. Issue 6 (92). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840010131-3-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840010131-3

18. Tovstoles N. N. Zakonodatel'stvo obschee i mestnoe o dukhovnykh zaveschaniyakh v svyazi s sudebnoj praktikoj i literaturoj voprosa: monografiya. SPb., 1900.

19. Black D. The Behavior of Law. Academic Press, 1976.