Везде
Japanese-Korean Contradictions in U.S. Politics, 1951—1954
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Japanese-Korean Contradictions in U.S. Politics, 1951—1954
Annotation
PII
S207987840017862-7-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840017862-7
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Valery Yungblyud 
ORCID: 0000-0002-2706-3904
Affiliation: Vyatka State University
Address: Russian Federation, Kirov
Denis Sadakov
Affiliation: Vyatka State University
Address: Russian Federation, Kirov
Edition
Volume 12 Issue 12 (110). Part 2
Abstract

The article focuses on U.S. policy toward the process of settling Japan-Korea relations from the signing of the San Francisco Peace Treaty until the failure of negotiations between Tokyo and Seoul in 1954. Many items on the modern agenda of Japan-Korea relations were formed during this period with the direct involvement of U.S. diplomacy. The United States sought to build a military-political triangle between Washington, Seoul and Tokyo. Japan were designated as a key ally and conduit of American policy. At the same time, South Korea was to become a continental foothold and a defensive barrier against communism. The situation was complicated by Japanese-Korean antagonism, manifested in the conflict over the demarcation of territorial waters and material claims by South Korean authorities against the former colonialist. Under such conditions, the Americans were solving the task of strengthening their own positions in the region and did not show any persistence in harmonizing relations between their allies.

Keywords
USA, Korean War, Japan, Republic of Korea, Japan-Korea Relations, J. Dulles, D. Acheson, S. Yoshida, Syngman Rhee, Liancourt Rocks
Источник финансирования
The research was funded by a grant from the Russian Science Foundation (project No 19-18-00501).
Received
28.05.2021
Publication date
27.12.2021
Number of characters
48118
Number of purchasers
13
Views
667
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
200 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
820 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2021
Subscription benefits
5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. D'yachkov I. V. Istoricheskaya pamyat' i politika: problema «zhenschin dlya utesheniya» v sovremennykh yuzhnokorejsko-yaponskikh otnosheniyakh // Yaponskie issledovaniya. 2019. № 4. S. 72—87.

2. Kistanov V. O. Otnosheniya mezhdu Yaponiej i Yuzhnoj Koreej: problemy, tendentsii, perspektivy // Yaponskie issledovaniya. 2019. № 3. S. 33—48.

3. Sadakov D. A. Otnosheniya SShA s Vremennym pravitel'stvom Korei v 1941—1945 gg. // Vestnik rossijskogo koreevedeniya. 2013. №5. S. 18—27.

4. Safronov V. P. SSSR—SShA—Yaponiya v gody «kholodnoj vojny». 1945—1960 gg. M., 2003.

5. Sevast'yanov S. V., Kravchuk A. A. Territorial'nyj spor mezhdu Yaponiej i Respublikoj Koreya: argumenty storon i perspektivy razresheniya // Izvestiya Vostochnogo instituta. 2017. № 4. S. 25—34.

6. Torkunov A. V., Denisov V. I., Li V. F. Korejskij poluostrov. Metamorfozy poslevoennoj istorii. M., 2008.

7. Sadakov D., Yungblyud V. US Policy of Appeasement towards Syngman Rhee in the Run-up to the 1954 Geneva Conference // ISTORIYA. 2019. Vol. 10. Issue 11 (85). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840008095-3-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840008095-3

8. Buckley R. US—Japan Alliance. Diplomacy 1945—1990. Cambridge, 1992.

9. Cha V. Bridging the Gap: The Strategic Context of the 1965 Korea—Japan Normalization Treaty // Korean Studies. 1996. Vol. 20. P. 123—160.

10. Chi Young Pak The Korean Straits. Dordrecht; Boston; London, 1988. P. 21.

11. Dong-Choon Kim The San Francisco Peace Treaty and “Korea” // The San Francisco System and Its Legacies: Continuation, transformation and historical reconciliation in the Asia-Pacific. Routledge, 2014. P. 97—114.

12. Establishment of “Syngman Rhee Line” and Illegal Occupation of Takeshima by the Republic of Korea. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.mofa.go.jp/a_o/na/takeshima/page1we_000064.html (data obrascheniya: 23.09.2020).

13. Hopkins M. Dean Acheson, and the obligation of power. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.

14. Hughes C. Japan’s Security Agenda. L., 2004. P. 62.

15. Jackson V. Getting Past the Past: Korea’s Transcendence of the Anti—Japan Policy Frontier // Asian Security. 2011. Vol. 7. № 3. P. 238—259. DOI:10.1080/14799855.2011.615083.

16. Japan — Republic of Korea // Digest of International Law. Vol. 4. Washington, 1965. P. 1184—1188.

17. Kinzer S. The Brothers. John Foster Dulles, Allen Dulles, and their secret world war. N. Y., 2013.

18. Lee Ch.-J. A troubled peace: US policy and the Koreas. Baltimore, 2006.

19. Oda S. Fifty Years of the law of the Sea. Hague; L.; N. Y., 2003.

20. Okita S. Japan's Economy and the Korean War // Far Eastern Survey.1951. Vol. 20. № 14. P. 141—144.

21. Paik Sun Yup From Pusan to Panmunjom. Washington, 1999.

22. Pembroke M. Korea: where the American century began. L., 2018.

23. Tae-Ryong Yoon. Learning to Cooperate not to Cooperate: Bargaining for the 1965 Korea—Japan Normalization // Asian Perspective. 2008. Vol. 32. № 2. P. 59—91.

24. The Cold War: interpreting conflict through primary documents. Santa-Barbara, 2018.

25. The US—Japan alliance: past, present and future / ed. by. M. J. Green and P. Cronin. CFR, 1999.

26. The US—Japan security alliance: regional multilateralism / ed. by T. Inoguchi, G. J. Ikenberry and Y. Sato. N. Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. 2011.

27. Yamasaki Y. The Invention of a Basis for the Possession of Takeshima by the Korean Government // Japan Review. 2018. Vol 2. № 3. P. 48—73.

28. Young-Joo Cho The Naval Policy of the Republic of Korea: from the beginnings to the twenty-first century. PhD dissertation. Hull, 2003.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate