Библиография
1. Бажанов В. А. Абстрагирование и абстракции в оптике нейронауки // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2021. Т. 58. № 2.
2. Гуссерль Э. Логические исследования. Мн.: Харвест, 2000.
3. Гуссерль Э. Логические исследования. Т. 2. М.: ДИК, 2001.
4. Зайцева Н. В. Значение как идеальный объект // Логическая семантика: перспективы для философии языка. М., 2011.
5. Зайцева Н. В. Когнитивные основания семантической теории Э. Гуссерля (на материале «Логических исследований») // Я. (А. Слинин) и Мы: к 70-летию профессора Ярослава Анатольевича Слинина. СПб., 2002.
6. Зайцева Н. В. К когнитивно-феноменологической трактовке рассуждений // Рацио.ru. 2016. № 1.
7. Зайцева Н. В. У истоков современной науки о сознании: Фреге или Гуссерль? // Рацио.ru. 2015. № 15.
8. Смирнова Е. Д. Логика в философии и философия логики // Логические исследования. 2000. № 7.
9. Современная логика: основания, предмет и перспективы развития: Сб. науч. трудов / под ред. Д. В. Зайцева. М.: Форум, 2018.
10. Aberdein A., Inglis M. (ed.). Advances in experimental philosophy of logic and mathematics. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.
11. Beavers A. F. Phenomenology and artificial intelligence // Metaphilosophy. 2002. Т. 33. № 1-2.
12. Bilokobylskyi O. “The hard problem” of consciousness in the light of phenomenology of аrtificial intelligence // Skhid. 2019. № 1 (159).
13. Benthem J. van. Logical dynamics of information and interaction. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
14. Benthem J. van. Where is logic going, and should it? // Topoi. 2006. Т. 25. № 1-2.
15. Cichy R. M., Kaiser D. Deep neural networks as scientific models // Trends in cognitive sciences. 2019. Т. 23. № 4.
16. Dreyfus H. L., Hall H. Husserl, intentionality, and cognitive science. MIT Press, 1982.
17. Egré P., Politzer G. On the negation of indicative conditionals / eds. Franke M., Aloni M., Roelofsen F. Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium, 2013.
18. Goel V. et al. The reasoning brain: The interplay between cognitive neuroscience and theories of reasoning // Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2017. Т. 10.
19. Harman G. Internal Critique: A Logic is not a Theory of Reasoning and a Theory of Reasoning is not a Logic // Studies in logic and practical reasoning. Elsevier, 2002. Т. 1.
20. Husserl E. Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Band: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik / ed. E. Holenstein. Haag: Nijhoff, 1975.
21. Ito T. et al. Discovering the computational relevance of brain network organization // Trends in cognitive sciences. 2020. Т. 24. № 1.
22. Joaquin J. J. et al. Prospects for experimental philosophical logic // Organon F. 2019. Т. 26. № 2.
23. Knobe J. Experimental philosophy is cognitive science // A companion to experimental philosophy. 2016.
24. Kriegeskorte N., Douglas P. K. Cognitive computational neuroscience // Nature neuroscience. 2018. Т. 21. № 9.
25. Lemhoff R. Intuitionism in the Philosophy of Mathematics // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition) / ed. Edward N. Zalta [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/intuitionism/ (дата обращения: 11.07.2021).
26. Magnani L. Naturalizing logic: Errors of reasoning vindicated: Logic reapproaches cognitive science // Journal of Applied Logic. 2015. Т. 13. № 1.
27. Malinowski J., Palczewski R. Logic in cognitive science // Logic and Logical Philosophy. 2011. Т. 20. № 1-2.
28. McIntyre R. Husserl and the representational theory of mind // Topoi. 1986. Т. 5. № 2.
29. Pfeifer N., Douven I. Formal epistemology and the new paradigm psychology of reasoning // Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 2014. Т. 5. № 2.
30. Pietarinen A. V. Logic, Neuroscience and Phenomenology in Cahoots? // WSPI. 2004.
31. Priest G. Revising logic // P. Rush (ed.). The metaphysics of logic. 2014.
32. Ragni M. et al. Two-valued logic is not sufficient to model human reasoning, but three-valued logic is: A formal analysis // Bridging@ IJCAI. 2016.
33. Ramírez D. A. J. G. Artificial Mathematical Intelligence: Cognitive, (Meta) mathematical, Physical and Philosophical Foundations. Springer Nature, 2020.
34. Ramos G. G. Human Rationality: Explanations from Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Logic // Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía. 2021. № 61.
35. Ripley D. Experimental philosophical logic // A companion to experimental philosophy. 2016.
36. Saldanha E. A. D. From Logic Programming to Human Reasoning: How to be Artificially Human // KI-Künstliche Intelligenz. 2018. Т. 32. № 4.
37. Savage N. How AI and neuroscience drive each other forwards // Nature. 2019. Т. 571. № 7766.
38. Schroyens W. Logic and/in psychology: The paradoxes of material implication and psychologism in the cognitive science of human reasoning // Cognition and conditionals: Probability and logic in human thinking. 2010.
39. Schurz G. Non-monotonic reasoning from an evolution-theoretic perspective: Ontic, logical and cognitive foundations // Syntheses. 2005. Т. 146. № 1.
40. Sedlár I., Šefránek J. Logic and cognitive science // Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science IV. 2014.
41. Smith J. C. (ed.). Historical foundations of cognitive science. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. Т. 46.
42. Stenning K., Van Lambalgen M. Human reasoning and cognitive science. MIT Press, 2012.
43. van Benthem J. Logical dynamics of information and interaction. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
44. van Benthem J. Where is logic going, and should it? // Topoi. 2006. Т. 25. № 1-2.
45. Wilson R. A., Keil F. C. (ed.). The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences. MIT press, 2001.
46. Woleński J. Logic in the light of cognitive science // Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric. 2016. Т. 48. № 1.
Комментарии
Сообщения не найдены