Везде
India-Us Relations: from the Past to the Future
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
India-Us Relations: from the Past to the Future
Annotation
PII
S207987840009475-1-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840009475-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Ellina P. Shavlay 
ORCID: 0000-0001-5380-7009
Affiliation:
MGIMO University
Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Volume 11 Issue 12 (98). Part II
Abstract

The paper considers the evolution of Indian-American relations from the 1940s to the present. The regional dimension in Indian-American relations is characterized by extreme inconsistency. Thus, New Delhi, the historical leader of the Non-Aligned Movement, despite the change in world order due to the fall of the Iron Curtain, continues to abandon allied relations and, as a rule, pursues a balanced policy in all regions barring its own — South Asia. Being primarily a South Asian regional power, India uncompromisingly defends its national interests in conflicts with Pakistan and does not allow the Pakistan-US dialogue to intervene in the solution of the Kashmir problem. The United States, in turn, reneges its historic course of unequivocal support for Islamabad and multilateral dispute settlement mechanisms in favor of a balanced approach, namely favoring bilateral negotiations between the conflicting parties. An important element of changes in South Asia’s importance is the emergence of nuclear weapons in the region. The nuclear factor significantly complicates the already difficult relationship between New Delhi and Islamabad and reinforces concerns of the globe and Washington in particular. The terrorist threat emanating from Pakistan and neighboring Afghanistan adds instability to the already conflicting relations between the countries of the region. The withdrawal of the US troops from Afghanistan does not contribute to improving the security architecture as well. In general, South Asia, both historically and today, is not high on the American foreign policy agenda. Accordingly, India and Pakistan are more important for the United States in the broader context of the Indo-Pacific Strategy (India) and the Greater Middle East (Pakistan), or as separate actors in international relations that contribute to solving problems in a bilateral format rather than South Asian countries per se.

Keywords
India, USA, South Asia, bipolar period, geopolitics, Pakistan factor
Received
17.05.2020
Publication date
31.12.2020
Number of characters
40675
Number of purchasers
15
Views
2270
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
200 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2020
Subscription benefits
5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Kupriyanov A. V. Region, kotorogo net na karte // Profil'. 05.2019 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://profile.ru/politics/region-kotorogo-net-na-karte-143683/

2. Lunev S. I. Indiya i SShA. Mezhgosudarstvennye otnosheniya. M., 1987.

3. Rumyantsev P. V. Politika SShA v svyazi s transformatsiej bagdadskogo pakta i obrazovaniem bloka SENTO (1958—1960 gg.) [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://sun.tsu.ru/mminfo/000063105/323/image/323-163.pdf

4. A Free and Open Indo-Pacific; Advancing a Shared Vision // The Department of State. November 2019 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Free-and-Open-Indo-Pacific-4Nov2019.pdf

5. About SAARC // South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://saarc-sec.org/about-saarc

6. Abraham I. From Bandung to NAM: Non-Alignment and Indian Foreign Policy, 1947—1965 // Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. 2008. Vol. 46. № 2. April. P. 195—219.

7. Akhtar S. Dynamics of USA-Pakistan Relations in the Post 9/11 Period: Hurdles and Future Prospects // International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. Vol. 2. № 11. June 2012. P. 212 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_11_June_2012/23.pdf

8. Baldev R. N., Paul T. V. India in the World Order: Searching for Major-Power Status. Cambridge, 2003.

9. Bodenheimer T., Gould R. Rollback!: Right-wing Power in U. S. Foreign Policy // South End Press. 1989.

10. Cohen S. P., Dasgupta S. US-South Asia: Relations Under Bush // The Brookings Institution [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/us-south-asia-relations-under-bush/

11. Das A. India’s Neighbourhood Policy: Challenges and Prospects // O. P. Jindal Global University (JGU). March 2019 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.jsia.edu.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/angana-das.pdf

12. De Hoyos L. Rajiv Gandhi and President Reagan set basis for U. S.—India relations // Executive Intelligence Review.

13. Dittmer L. South Asia's Security Dilemma // Asian Survey. Vol. 41. № 6. November/December 2001. P. 897

14. English Translation of Press Statement by External Affairs Minister during visit of US Secretary of State to India. 25 October 2017 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.mea.gov.in/Speeches-Statements.htm?dtl/29052/

15. India-Pakistan War 1965 // History Division, Ministry of Defence, Government of India [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.bharat-rakshak.com/archives/OfficialHistory/1965War/1965Chapter11.pdf

16. Kerr P. K., Nikitin M. B. Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons: Proliferation and Security Issues // Congressional Research Service. June 2009 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20090612_RL34248_b8b743b2e448e189ba7e0cc3f16f6d59f2e2089f.pdf

17. Khanna V. N. Foreign Policy of India. 2018.

18. Khilani S., Kumar R., Mehta P.B., et al. NonAlignment 2.0: A Foreign and Strategic Policy for India in the Twenty First Century. Centre for Policy Research, India, 2012.

19. Kugelman M. U. S. Policy in South Asia: Imperatives and Challenges // The Wilson Center. October 2016 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/us-policy-south-asia-imperatives-and-challenges#_ednref7

20. Kux D. India and the United States: Estranged Democracies 1941—1991. Honolulu, 1993.

21. Mahajan H. O. Are We Looking at a Changed US Stand on Kashmir? // Swarajya. July 2016 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://swarajyamag.com/politics/are-we-looking-at-a-changed-us-stand-on-kashmir

22. Nandy D. New Diplomatic Ties between the World Largest and Oldest Democracies in the Post-Cold War Period: India and the United States // Political Sciences & Public Affairs. 2014 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.esciencecentral.org/journals/new-diplomatic-ties-between-the-world-largest-and-oldest-democracies-in-the-post-cold-war-period-india-and-the-united-states-2332-0761.1000139.pdf

23. Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs, United States Department of State. A Guide to the United States' History of Recognition, Diplomatic, and Consular Relations, by country, since 1776: India [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://history.state.gov/countries/india

24. Prados J., Feffer J. The AfPak Paradox // Foreign Policy in Focus. April 2009 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://fpif.org/the_afpak_paradox/

25. Ranjan A. India’s South Asia Policy: Changes, Continuity or Continuity with Changes. // The Round Table – The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs. 2019. 108:3. P. 259—274.

26. Reagan R. Remarks at the welcoming ceremony for Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi // The American Presidency Project. 1985.

27. Remarks by President Trump on the Strategy in Afghanistan and South Asia. // The White House. August 2017 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-strategy-afghanistan-south-asia/

28. Roy-Chaudhury R., Sullivan de Estrada K. India, the IndoPacific and the Quad // Survival. 60:3. 2018. P. 181—194.

29. Smith S. Trump admin cancels $300M aid to Pakistan over terror record // NBC News. September 2018 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/trump-admin-cancels-300m-aid-pakistan-over-terror-record-n905786

30. State Department Telegram to Embassies New Delhi and Karachi. 6 September 1965.

31. Sultana S., Alqama S. K., Farooq M. U. S. Economics Assistance to India & Pakistan: A Comparative Study // Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences. 2013. Vol. 33. № 1. P. 26.

32. Tarapore A. A More Focused and Resilient U. S.—India Strategic Partnership // Center for a New American Security. October 2019 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/a-more-focused-and-resilient-u-s-india-strategic-partnership

33. Tripathi S. India’s Foreign Policy Dilemma over Non-Alignment 2.0. SAGE Publishing India. 2019.

34. Valente P. The Tiger and the Dragon: India as a Counterbalance to China in the Indo-Pacific // Modern War Institute. 09.2018 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://mwi.usma.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/The-Tiger-and-the-Dragon.pdf

35. Zykofsky P. Gandhi's visit poses development option to the Reagan administration // Executive Intelligence Review. Vol. 9. № 31. 17 August 1982 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1982/eirv09n31-19820817/eirv09n31-19820817.pdf

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate