Korean Emperor’s Attempts to Maintain the Independence of Korea after the Forcible Establishment of a Protectorate by Japan
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Korean Emperor’s Attempts to Maintain the Independence of Korea after the Forcible Establishment of a Protectorate by Japan
Annotation
PII
S207987840008737-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Bella Pak 
Affiliation: Institute of Oriental Studies RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

This article discusses the attempts of Korean Emperor Kojong, who was captured by the Japanese after the forced abdication and the forcible establishment of a protectorate over Korea, to draw the attention of great powers and international public opinion to the fate of the Korean state. The initial principles of historical science are applied, namely: the principle of historicism, an objective view of historical phenomena and a comparative historical analysis of events and facts. The article describes in detail the attempts of the Korean emperor to emphasize the independent status of Korea, the struggle against the protectorate forcibly imposed on Korea, the agreement on the establishment of which he never signed, his search for an opportunity to show his personal independence. Kojong’s attempts to bring forward the issue of the Japanese’s actions to Korea and the decision of the future fate of the state entrusted to him for consideration by the international court, in particular, the Hague Conference, are highlighted. Appeals of people close to the emperor to the Russian representative. The position of Russian diplomats on the timeliness of raising the issue of Korean independence at a conference in The Hague is shown. For the first time, the history of the trip to The Hague in April 1907 to the 2nd Peace Conference of the Plenipotentiaries of the Korean Emperor, to speak out exposing the actions of Japanese imperialism in defense of the sovereignty of Korea, announcing to representatives of the powers that the treaty on November 17, 1905 was imposed on Korea and that the Korean government wants to restore direct diplomatic relations with foreign states. The reasons for not allowing Korean delegates to participate in the conference are analyzed. The article shows their exposure to Japanese aggression in Korea at a meeting of the international pacifist club. The author highlights the reaction of the Japanese authorities to the arrival and appearance of Korean delegates in The Hague and the use by the Japanese government of the Hague incident as an pretext to overthrow Kojong. The main steps of Japan on the path to the final annexation of Korea have been recreated: the imposition on July 24, 1907 of Korea of the “Treaty of Seven Articles”, the text of which was signed by Ito Hirobumi, and Li Wangyong, transferring control of the entire Korean legislative and executive power to the Japanese general and the destruction of the Korean army, the last bastion of Korean independence.

Keywords
V. N. Lamsdorf, G. A. Planson, Korean emperor Kojon, Ito Hirobumi, treaty of protectorate November 17, 1905, treaty of seven articles, sovereignty of Korea, Korean delegation at the Hague Peace Conference in 1905, annexation
Источник финансирования
The research was carried out at the expense of a grant from the Russian science Foundation (grant no.19-18-00017 “Problems of the historical past in Japan's relations with East Asian countries and Russia. Lesson for Russia”).
Received
10.03.2020
Publication date
14.12.2020
Number of characters
74946
Number of purchasers
16
Views
1811
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2020

References

1. Korea. Treaties and Agreements. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Division of International Law; Korea; Japan; China. Publisher: Washington, 1921.

2. Series: Pamphlet series of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Division of International Law. № 43.

3. Shinya Murase. The Presence of Asia at the 1907 Hague Conference // Colloquium of the Hague Academy of International Law, 6—7 September 2007. P. 7—12.

4. Vanin Yu. V. Koreya i Gaagskaya mirnaya konferentsiya 1907 g. // Vostok. 2008. № 6. S. 45—66.

5. Vasilevskaya I. I. Kolonial'naya politika Yaponii v Koree nakanune anneksii (1904—1910). M.,1975.

6. Istoriya diplomatii. T. II. M., 1963.

7. Istoriya Korei (s drevnejshikh vremen do nashikh dnej). T. 1.

8. Li Bomdzhin / sost. Pak B. D. Seriya «Rossijskie korejtsy». M., 2002.

9. Pak B. D. Rossiya i Koreya. Izd. 2-e, dopoln. M., 2004.

10. Choson kvange choyak chip. 1876—1945. («Sbornik dogovorov, imeyuschikh otnoshenie k Koree. 1876—1945»). Pkhen'yan, 1949.

11. Shulatov Ya. A. Na puti k sotrudnichestvu: rossijsko-yaponskie otnosheniya v 1905—1914 gg. M., 2008.

12. Grimm E. D. The collection of treaties and other documents on history of the international relations in the Far East (1842—1925). M., 1927.

13. Koen de Coester. The Dutch Government and Media reaction to the Korean Mission to the 1907 Hague Peace Conference // Mindzhon munkhvayonguvon chkhansol' 50 chunyon kinem kukche khaksul' 'veyj charyochip «1907 nen Khehjgy pkhyonkhva khveyj va Tehkhan cheguk, kyrigo yolgan» (Sbornik materialov mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferentsii, posvyaschennnoj 50-letiyu osnovaniya Instituta natsional'noj kul'tury, «Gaagskaya mirnaya konferentsiya, Korejskaya imperiya i velikie derzhavy»). Seul, 2007.S. 55—64.

14. (조선관계조약집 (1876—1945), 조선민주주의인민공화국 외무성, 1949.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate