Ethnography vs Philology: Rod in Turkic and Mongolian Nomadic Societies in the Studies of N. N. Kozmin and His Contemporaries

Tishin, Vladimir V.; Nanzatov, Bair

doi:10.18254/S207987840008384-1

Home>Issue 1 (87)>Ethnography vs Philology: “Rod” in Turkic and Mongolian Nomadic Societies in the Studies of N. N. Kozmin and His Contemporaries

Ethnography vs Philology: “Rod” in Turkic and Mongolian Nomadic Societies in the Studies of N. N. Kozmin and His Contemporaries

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

Ethnography vs Philology: “Rod” in Turkic and Mongolian Nomadic Societies in the Studies of N. N. Kozmin and His Contemporaries

Annotation

PII

S207987840008384-1-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840008384-1

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Vladimir V. Tishin Send message

ORCID: 0000-0001-7344-0996

Affiliation: Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Ulan-Ude

Bair Nanzatov

Affiliation: Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Ulan-Ude

Edition

Volume 11 Issue 1 (87)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the views of soviet researchers of the 1920s — 1930s. on the social organization of the nomads of the Eurasian steppes, with a focus on the interpretation of the concept of “rod” (clan). The main attention is drawn to the thoughts of the Irkutsk researcher N. N. Koz’min, viewed through the prism of polemics with opponents, the main of which he himself saw other representatives of the pre-revolutionary school were W. Barthold and B. Ya. Vladimirtsov. The article attempts to show that initially the views of N. N. Koz’min were quite close to the views on social processes among nomads by such researchers as W. Radloff and H. Vámbéry, based of ethnographical material and finally became the basis for studying the social history of nomadism. Most important in the position of N. N. Koz’min was the perception of nomadic unions as politically organized units. That, in turn, intends to consider ethnic and social processes in nomadic societies as closely related and inextricable.

Keywords

Nikolai Nikolaevich Koz’min, nomads, social organization, clan, historiography, Marxism

Received

09.11.2019

Publication date

29.02.2020

Number of characters

51940

Number of purchasers

Views

2120

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Nanzatov B., Tishin V. Ethnography vs Philology: “Rod” in Turkic and Mongolian Nomadic Societies in the Studies of N. N. Kozmin and His Contemporaries // ISTORIYA. – 2020. – V. 11. – Issue 1 (87). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840008384-1-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840008384-1
MLA	Nanzatov, Bair, Tishin, Vladimir V "Ethnography vs Philology: “Rod” in Turkic and Mongolian Nomadic Societies in the Studies of N. N. Kozmin and His Contemporaries." ISTORIYA. 11.1 (87) (2020). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840008384-1
APA	Nanzatov B., Tishin V. (2020). Ethnography vs Philology: “Rod” in Turkic and Mongolian Nomadic Societies in the Studies of N. N. Kozmin and His Contemporaries. ISTORIYA. vol. 11, no. 1 (87) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840008384-1

Full text is available to subscribers only

Subscribe right now

Only article and additional services

Subscription benefits

200 RUB / 1.0 SU

Whole issue and additional services

Subscription benefits

1000 RUB / 10.0 SU

All issues and additional services for 2020

Subscription benefits

5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Abylkhozhin Zh. B. Traditsionnaya struktura Kazakhstana: sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie aspekty funktsionirovaniya i transformatsii (1920-e — 1930-e gg.). Alma-Ata, 1991.

2. Bartol'd V. V. Ulugbek i ego vremya // Bartol'd V. V. Sochineniya: v 9 t. M., 1964. T. II. Ch. 2. Raboty po otdel'nym problemam istorii Srednej Azii. S. 25—196.

3. Bartol'd V. V. Dvenadtsat' lektsij po istorii turetskikh narodov Srednej Azii // Bartol'd V. V. Sochineniya: v 9 t. M., 1968. T. V. Raboty po istorii i filologii tyurkskikh i mongol'skikh narodov. S. 19—192.

4. Bartol'd V. V. Obrazovanie imperii Chingiz-khana (probnaya lektsiya, chitannaya v SPb. univ. 8 aprelya 1896 g.) // Bartol'd V. V. Sochineniya: v 9 t. M., 1968. T. V. Raboty po istorii i filologii tyurkskikh i mongol'skikh narodov. S. 253—265.

5. Bartol'd V. V. [Rets. na] N. A. Aristov, Zametki ob ehtnicheskom sostave tyurkskikh plemen i narodnostej i svedeniya ob ikh chislennosti // Bartol'd V. V. Sochineniya: v 9 t. M., 1968. T. V. Raboty po istorii i filologii tyurkskikh i mongol'skikh narodov. S. 266—279.

6. Bartol'd V. V. Svyaz' obschestvennogo byta s khozyajstvennym ukladom u turok i mongolov // Bartol'd V. V. Sochineniya: v 9 t. M., 1968. T. V. Raboty po istorii i filologii tyurkskikh i mongol'skikh narodov. S. 468—472.

7. Bartol'd V. V. Pamyati V. V. Radlova. 1837—1918 // Bartol'd V. V. Sochineniya: v 9 t. M., 1977. T. IX. Raboty po istorii vostokovedeniya. S. 665—688.

8. Bernshtam A. [N.] Problema raspadeniya rodovykh otnoshenij u kochevnikov Azii // Sovetskaya ehtnografiya. 1934. № 6. S. 86—95.

9. Vladimirtsov B. Ya. Obschestvennyj stroj mongolov. Mongol'skij kochevoj feodalizm // Vladimirtsov B. Ya. Raboty po istorii i ehtnografii mongol'skikh narodov / redkol.: V. M. Alpatov (pred.) i dr. M., 2002. S. 295—488.

10. Vladimirtsov B. Ya. Chingis-khan // Vladimirtsov B. Ya. Raboty po istorii i ehtnografii mongol'skikh narodov / redkol.: V. M. Alpatov (pred.) i dr. M., 2002. S. 141—207.

11. Grekov B. D., Yakubovskij A. Yu. Zolotaya Orda (Ocherk istorii Ulusa Dzhuchi v period slozheniya i rastsveta v XIII—XIV vv.). L., 1937.

12. Inostrantsev K. A. Khunnu i gunny (razbor teorij o proiskhozhdenii naroda Khunnu kitajskikh letopisej, o proiskhozhdenii evropejskikh gunnov i o vzaimnykh otnosheniyakh ehtikh dvukh narodov). 2-e dopoln. izd. L., 1926. (Trudy turkologicheskogo seminariya. T. I).

13. K istorii Buryato-Mongolii. Materialy diskussii, sostoyavshejsya v iyune 1934 g. v Ulan-Udeh / predisl. A. V. Shestakova; pod red. A. V. Shestakova i A. I. Lomakina. M.; L., 1935.

14. Kazakevich V. A. Prof. N. N. Koz'min. Problemy istorii Mongolii i Yuzhnoj Sibiri v novom osveschenii. [Rets. na] K voprosu o turetsko-mongol'skom feodalizme, OGIZ, Moskva—Irkutsk, 1934 // Sovetskaya ehtnografiya. 1934. № 5. S. 112—117.

15. Koz'min N. [N.] D. A. Klements i istoriko-ehtnograficheskie issledovaniya v Minusinskom // Izvestiya Vostochno-Sibirskogo Otdela Imperatorskogo Russkogo Geograficheskogo Obschestva. 1917. T. XVI. 1916. S. 35—64.

16. Koz'min N. N. Khakasy: istoriko-ehtnograficheskij i khozyajstvennyj ocherk Minusinskogo kraya. Irkutsk, 1925 // Kraevedcheskaya ser. № 4 / pod red. M. A. Azadovskogo. Vyp. V.

17. Koz'min N. N. Khozyajstvo i narodnost' (proizvodstvennyj faktor v ehtnicheskikh protsessakh) // Sibirskaya zhivaya starina. 1928. Vyp. 7. S. 1—22.

18. Koz'min N. N. K voprosu o turetsko-mongol'skom feodalizme / predisl. M. Gudoshnikova. M.; Irkutsk, 1934.

19. Koz'min N. N. Predislovie // D’Osson K. Istoriya mongolov ot Chingiz-khana do Tamerlana. Irkutsk, 1937. T. 1. Chingiz-khan / per. i predisl. prof. N. N. Koz'mina. S. V—XXXX.

20. Koz'min N. N. K voprosu o vremeni pereseleniya buryat v Pribajkal'e // Bogdanov M. N. Ocherki istorii buryat-mongol'skogo naroda [s dopolnitel'nymi stat'yami B. B. Baradina i N. N. Koz'mina] / pod red. N. N. Koz'mina. 3-e izd. Ulan-Udeh, 2014. S. 37—51.

21. Koz'min N. N. Chto predstavlyala Mongoliya // Bogdanov M. N. Ocherki istorii buryat-mongol'skogo naroda [s dopolnitel'nymi stat'yami B. B. Baradina i N. N. Koz'mina] / pod red. N. N. Koz'mina. 3-e izd. Ulan-Udeh, 2014. S. 60—66.

22. Kradin N. N. Kochevniki Evrazii. Almaty, 2007.

23. Kuz'min Yu. V., Svinin V. V. Irkutskaya shkola mongolovedeniya (KhVIII—KhKh vv.). Irkutsk, 2014.

24. Levshin A. I. Opisanie kirgiz-kazach'ikh ili kirgiz-kajsatskikh ord i stepej. Almaty, 1996.

25. Literaturnoe nasledstvo Sibiri. Novosibirsk, 1969. T. I. Gor'kij i Sibir'. Zabytoe i najdennoe. Pis'ma uchenykh-sibirevedov i pisatelej M. K. Azadovskomu / red. kol.: N. F. Babushkin, E. I. Belen'kij, A. V. Vysotskij, N. N. Yanovskij.

26. Markov G. E. Kochevniki Azii. Struktura khozyajstva i obschestvennoj organizatsii. M., 1976.

27. Pisarevskij N. P. Izuchenie istorii rannikh skotovodcheskikh obschestv stepi i lesostepi Evrazii v sovetskoj arkheologii serediny 20-kh — pervoj poloviny 30-kh gg.: dis. … kand. ist. nauk : 07.00.06. Kemerovo, 1989.

28. Potapov L. P. Ocherk istorii Ojrotii: altajtsy v period russkoj kolonizatsii. Novosibirsk, 1933.

29. Radlov V. V. K voprosu ob ujgurakh. Iz predisloviya k izdaniyu Kudatku-Bilika. Prilozhenie k LXXII-mu tomu Zapisok Imperatorskoj Akademii Nauk. № 2. SPb., 1893.

30. Radlov V. V. Iz Sibiri: stranitsy dnevnika / per. s nem. K. D. Tsivinoj, B. E. Chistovoj. M., 1989.

31. Reshetov A. M. Nikolaj Nikolaevich Koz'min: osnovnye napravleniya nauchnoj deyatel'nosti // Repressirovannye ehtnografy. M., 1999. Vyp. 1 / sost. i otv. red. D. D. Tumarkin. S. 81—100.

32. Smirnov N. O feodalizme u kochevykh narodov ([Rets. na] Prof. N. N. Koz'min, K voprosu o turetsko-mongol'skom feodalizme. OGIZ, Moskva—Irkutsk, 1934) // Istorik-marksist. 1935. № 2-3 (42-43). S. 140—143.

33. Khazanov A. M. Kochevniki i vneshnij mir. Izd. 3-e, dop. Almaty, 2002.

34. Lattimore O. The Social History of Mongol Nomadism // Historians of China and Japan / ed. by W. G. Beasley and E. G. Pulleyblank. London, 1961. P. 328—343.

35. Vámbéry H. Das Türkenvolk in seinen Ethnologischen und Ethnographischen Beziehungen. Leipzig, 1885.

36. Zeki Validi Togan A. Ibn Faḏlān’s Reisebericht. Leipzig, 1939 // Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes. Bd. XXIV. Nr. 3.