The Lattice of the Garden of the Winter Palace: Transformation of Symbolic Meaning in the First Quarter of the 20th Century

Lyubeznikov, Oleg

doi:10.18254/S207987840008304-3

Home>Issue 1 (87)>The Lattice of the Garden of the Winter Palace: Transformation of Symbolic Meaning in the First Quarter of the 20th Century

The Lattice of the Garden of the Winter Palace: Transformation of Symbolic Meaning in the First Quarter of the 20th Century

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

The Lattice of the Garden of the Winter Palace: Transformation of Symbolic Meaning in the First Quarter of the 20th Century

Annotation

PII

S207987840008304-3-1

DOI

10.18254/S207987840008304-3

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Oleg Lyubeznikov Send message

Affiliation: Saint Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Edition

Volume 11 Issue 1 (87)

Abstract

The article is concerned with the history of the existence and symbolic transformation of the lattice of the garden of the Winter Palace throughout the 20th century. The fence erected by the will of Empress Alexandra Fedorovna became a symbol of the Russian monarchy. The tragic events that unfolded in the immediate vicinity of the fence on January 9, 1905 “connected” the lattice and the First Russian Revolution into a single commemorative space. After the revolution of 1917 the lattice was disfigured (double-headed eagles and monograms were broken) and was installed on the working outskirts. The author tried to understand why that was happened, and turned to the analysis of archival paperwork and reconstructed the history of another attempt at symbolic transformation of the lattice in the mid-1920s. The lattice is a semantically complex monument, the struggle of various actors for the “recoding” of which continued throughout the 20th century. Both research methods traditional for historical science are used, as well as those associated with the concept of “symbolic politics”, including the comparison method of B. Forest and D. Johnson, who consider monuments as symbolic capital for which political actors are fighting. Drawings of the monogram filling of the lattice are first introduced into the historical science.

Keywords

lattice, the garden of the Winter Palace, January 9, Bloody Sunday, L. A. Ilyin, R. F. Katzer, fence

Received

19.10.2019

Publication date

29.02.2020

Number of characters

26286

Number of purchasers

Views

1818

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Lyubeznikov O. The Lattice of the Garden of the Winter Palace: Transformation of Symbolic Meaning in the First Quarter of the 20th Century // ISTORIYA. – 2020. – V. 11. – Issue 1 (87). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840008304-3-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S207987840008304-3
MLA	Lyubeznikov, Oleg "The Lattice of the Garden of the Winter Palace: Transformation of Symbolic Meaning in the First Quarter of the 20th Century." ISTORIYA. 11.1 (87) (2020). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840008304-3
APA	Lyubeznikov O. (2020). The Lattice of the Garden of the Winter Palace: Transformation of Symbolic Meaning in the First Quarter of the 20th Century. ISTORIYA. vol. 11, no. 1 (87) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840008304-3

Full text is available to subscribers only

Subscribe right now

Only article and additional services

Subscription benefits

200 RUB / 1.0 SU

Whole issue and additional services

Subscription benefits

1000 RUB / 10.0 SU

All issues and additional services for 2020

Subscription benefits

5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Anan'ev V. G. K istorii muzeefikatsii Isaakievskogo sobora v kontse 1920-kh gg. // Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya. 2019. № 1. S. 102—112.

2. Berar E. Imperiya i gorod: Nikolaj II, «Mir iskusstva» i gorodskaya duma v Sankt-Peterburge. 1894—1914. M., 2016.

3. Vesnina N. N. Sad v pamyat' zhertv rasstrela 1905 g. // Istoriya Peterburga. 2007. № 1 (35). S. 54—59.

4. Vesnina N. N. Sadovyj master R. F. Kattser // Pamyatniki istorii i kul'tury Sankt-Peterburga: Issledovaniya i materialy. Vyp. 4. / pod nauch. red. B. M. Kirikova. SPb., 1997. S. 213—232.

5. Ganelin R. Sh. Kanun «Krovavogo voskresen'ya» (Tsarskie vlasti 6 — 8 yanvarya 1905 goda) // Ganelin R. Sh. V Rossii dvadtsatogo veka. Stat'i raznykh let. M., 2014. S. 109—125.

6. Germont G. N. Reshetki Leningrada i ego okrestnostej. M., 1938.

7. Gorbatenko S. B. Petergofskaya doroga. Istoriko-arkhitekturnyj putevoditel'. SPb., 2013.

8. Izmozik V. S., Lebina N. B. Peterburg sovetskij: «novyj chelovek» v starom prostranstve: 1920-e — 1930-e gody: Sotsial'no-arkhitekturnoe mikroistoricheskoe issledovanie. SPb., 2016.

9. Kolesova O. S. «Tvoikh ograd uzor chugunnyj…». L., 1970.

10. Kolonitskij B. I. Simvoly vlasti i bor'ba za vlast': k izucheniyu politicheskoj kul'tury rossijskoj revolyutsii 1917 g. SPb., 2012.

11. Konivets A. V. Zimnij dvorets: Ot imperatorskoj rezidentsii do Kavshkoly Osoaviakhima. SPb., 2014.

12. Konivets A. V. Pervoe maya 1920 g. Kak snesli reshetku u Zimnego dvortsa // Istoriya Peterburga. 2009. № 1 (47). S. 22—24.

13. Kudryavtsev A. N., Shkoda G. N. Volkovskoe pravoslavnoe kladbische i nekropol'-muzej Literatorskie mostki // Kobak A. V., Piryutko Yu. M. Istoricheskie kladbischa Sankt-Peterburga. M.; SPb., 2009. S. 315—354.

14. Levitan I. I. Ploschad' Stachek. L., 1987.

15. Leningrad. Putevoditel': V 2 t. T. 2. Progulki po gorodu. Muzei. Nauchnye uchrezhdeniya: Spravochnik. M.; L., 1933.

16. Lyubeznikov O. A. Isaakievskij sobor v 1917—1920-e gg. Arkhitektory M. T. Preobrazhenskij, N. P. Nikitin, A. P. Udalenkov i problema muzeefikatsii pamyatnika. SPb., 2017.

17. Malinova O. Yu. Politika pamyati kak oblast' simvolicheskoj politiki // Metodologicheskie voprosy izucheniya politiki pamyati: Sb. nauch. tr. / otv. red. A. I. Miller, D. V. Efremenko. M.; SPb., 2018. S. 27—53.

18. Matveev B. M. Zhertvy. Bortsy. Geroi. Metamorfozy pamyatnika na Marsovom pole // Pamyatniki istorii i kul'tury Sankt-Peterburga: Issledovaniya i materialy. Vyp. 6. / pod nauch. red. B. M. Kirikova. SPb., 2002. S. 260—275.

19. Nesin V. N. Zimnij dvorets v tsarstvovanie imperatora Nikolaya II. SPb., 1999.

20. Piotrovskij A. I. Khronika Leningradskikh Prazdnestv 1919—1922 gg. // Massovye prazdnestva: Sb. komiteta sotsiologicheskogo izucheniya iskusstva. L., 1926. S. 55—84.

21. Polenov I. Yu. Detskij park imeni 9 yanvarya // Sady i parki Leningrada. L., 1981. S. 112—120.

22. Reshetka sada u Imperatorskogo Zimnego dvortsa // Zodchij. 1900. № 7. S. 96.

23. Sadovo-parkovoe iskusstvo Leningrada v proizvedeniyakh khudozhnikov i arkhitektorov XVIII—XX vv.: Katalog vystavki. L., 1983.

24. Solomakha E. Yu. Ehrmitazh i Zimnij dvorets v 1917 g. // Ehrmitazh. Ot Fevralya k Oktyabryu. 1917. Arkhivnye dokumenty. SPb., 2017. S. 9—62.

25. Troitskij most. 115 let / nauch. red. G. I. Bogdanov. SPb., 2018.

26. Udalenkov A. O rabote Komiteta po okhrane i remontu monumental'nykh pamyatnikov // Muzej. Izd-e LO Glavnauki NKP. 1924. № 2. S. 6—14.

27. Shenle A. Arkhitektura zabveniya: ruiny i istoricheskoe soznanie v Rossii Novogo vremeni. M., 2018.

28. Shkarovskij M. V. Plany sovetskoj monumental'noj propagandy v otnoshenii Dvortsovoj ploschadi Peterburga i soprotivlenie im so storony intelligentsii v 1918 — 1920-e gg. // Kul'tura i vlast' v SSSR. 1920-e — 1950-e gg.: Materialy IX mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferentsii. Sankt-Peterburg, 24—26 oktyabrya 2016 g. M., 2017. S. 272—282.

29. Forest B., Johnson J. Monumental Politics: Regime Type and Public Memory in Post-Communist States // Post-Soviet Affairs. 2011. Vol. 27. № 3. P. 269—288.

30. Kelly C. Socialist Churches: Radical Secularization and the Preservation of the Past in Petrograd and Leningrad, 1918—1988. DeKalb, 2016.