Colonial Nationalism in the U.S. Press Assessments

Buranok, Sergey

doi:10.18254/S0002443-6-1

English

Home>Issue 8 (72)>“Colonial Nationalism” in the U.S. Press Assessments

“Colonial Nationalism” in the U.S. Press Assessments

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

“Colonial Nationalism” in the U.S. Press Assessments

Annotation

PII

S207987840002443-6-1

DOI

10.18254/S0002443-6-1

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Sergey Buranok Send message

Affiliation: Samara State University of Social Sciences and Education
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Edition

Volume 9 Issue 8 (72)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of formation of approaches and assessments of a problem of nationalism in the colonies after 1945 in the US press. One of the important results of the World War II was the gradual disintegration of the colonial empires linked with the growth of national movements and a significant weakening of metropolitan powers after the war. The process of disintegration of colonial empires coincided with the genesis of the new global confrontation between the former Allies. The Cold War and the search for the optimal relations with the closest ally of the USA — Great Britain — required new approaches and views on the decolonization process. At the same time, ambitions of the White House, which on the one hand supported disintegration of colonial empires, and on the other — diligently tried to replace the former empires by itself led to a number of contradictions with the European states.

Keywords

Press, decolonization, Cold War, Third World, USA, USSR

Источник финансирования

The research was prepared with the support of the grant of the Russian Science Foundation, project N17-78-20029.

Received

24.06.2018

Publication date

28.09.2018

Number of characters

13998

Number of purchasers

Views

5074

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

GOST	Buranok S. “Colonial Nationalism” in the U.S. Press Assessments // ISTORIYA. – 2018. – V. 9. – Issue 8 (72). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840002443-6-1/. DOI: 10.18254/S0002443-6-1
MLA	Buranok, Sergey "“Colonial Nationalism” in the U.S. Press Assessments." ISTORIYA. 9.8 (72) (2018). DOI: 10.18254/S0002443-6-1
APA	Buranok S. (2018). “Colonial Nationalism” in the U.S. Press Assessments. ISTORIYA. vol. 9, no. 8 (72) DOI: 10.18254/S0002443-6-1

Full text is available to subscribers only

Subscribe right now

Only article and additional services

Subscription benefits

200 RUB / 1.0 SU

Whole issue and additional services

Subscription benefits

800 RUB / 10.0 SU

All issues and additional services for 2018

Subscription benefits

2500 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Egorova N.I. «Novaya istoriya kholodnoj vojny» v sovremennykh zarubezhnykh issledovaniyakh // Novaya i novejshaya istoriya. 2009. № 4. S. 116 – 129.

2. Egorova N.I. Kholodnaya vojna v osveschenii novejshej rossijskoj istoriografii // Ehlektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel'nyj zhurnal Istoriya. 2014. № 7 (30) URL: http://history.jes.su/s207987840000842-5-1

3. Ann Heiss M. Empire and Nationhood: the United States, Great Britain, and Iranian Oil, 1950-1954. New York, 1997.

4. Ashcroft B., Griffiths G., Tiffin H. The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literatures. L., N.Y.: Routledge, 2010.

5. Bennett H. ‘“A very salutary effect”: The Counter-Terror Strategy in the Early Malayan Emergency, June 1948 to December 1949 // Journal of Strategic Studies. 2009. № 3. P. 415 – 444.

6. Borgwardt E. A new deal for the world: America's vision for human rights. Harvard, 2007.

7. Brinkley D.G. Facey-Crowther D. The Atlantic Charter. Basingstoke, 1994.

8. Chicago Daily Tribune. 1945 – 1947.

9. Christian Science Monitor. 1947.

10. Citino N. Out of the Blue? Historical Scholarship on U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East // OAH Magazine of History. 2006. № 3. R. 8-12.

11. Cooper F. Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, 2005.

12. Daily Boston Globe. 1945.

13. Frost R.A. Reflections on British Colonial Policy // Pacific Affairs. 1945. No. 4. R. 309 – 320.

14. Groen P. Militant Response: The Dutch use of military force and the decolonization of Dutch East Indies 1945 – 1950 // The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History. 1993. Vol. 21. P. 30 – 44.

15. Hoopes T., Brinkley D. FDR and the Creation of the U.N. New Haven, 2000.

16. Jacobs M. The Riddle of Islam: American Images and Interpretations, 1945-1960 // The United States and the Middle East: Diplomatic and Economic Relations in Historical Perspective. New Haven, 2000. P. 135-147.

17. James-Chakraborty K. Beyond Postcolonialism: New Directions for The History of Nonwestern Architecture // Frontiers of Architectural Research. 2014. № 3. P. 1–9.

18. Kanet R.E. The Superpower Quest for Empire: The Cold War and Soviet Support for “Wars of National Liberation” // Cold War History. 2006. № 3. R. 331 – 352.

19. Little D. American Orientalism: The United States and the Middle East Since 1945. Chapel Hill, 2004.

20. Little D. Gideon's Band: America and the Middle East since 1945 // Diplomatic History. 1994. № 4. R. 513-540.

21. Los Angeles Times. 1947.01.29. R. 1.

22. Louis W.R. Ends of British Imperialism: The Scramble for Empire, Suez and Decolonization. London, 2006.

23. Makdisi U. Faith Misplaced: the Broken Promise of U.S.-Arab Relations: 1820-2001. New York, 2010. P. 118-119.

24. McAlister M. Epic Encounters: Culture, Media, and U.S. Interests in the Middle East, 1945-2000. Berkeley, 2001.

25. New York Times. 1945 – 1947.

26. Postcolonialism: Critical concepts in literary and cultural studies. Ed. by D. Brydon. L.; N.Y., 2000. Vol. 1–5.

27. Stivers W. Supremacy and Oil: Iraq, Turkey, and the Anglo American World Order, 1918-1930. Cornell, 1982.

28. The Washington Post. 1945 – 1946.

29. Wichhart S.K. Selling Democracy During the Second British Occupation of Iraq 1941 – 1945 // Journal of Contemporary History. 2013. No. 3. R. 509 – 536.