“Lies” and “Holy lies”: the Problem of Deception in the Context of Medieval Piety
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
“Lies” and “Holy lies”: the Problem of Deception in the Context of Medieval Piety
Annotation
PII
S207987840002377-3-1
DOI
10.18254/S0002377-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Yulia Arnautova 
Occupation: Senior Research Fellow
Affiliation: Institute of World History RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract
Since the Reformation, the cult of saints and their relics has been heavily criticized as a deception of selfish priests. But whether really all the things that from the modern point of view should be considered as deception, i.e. conscious deviation from the truth, were the one and the same in medieval polemics? The article discusses where the boundary between the truth and the falsification (falsitas) lies in the sphere of medieval piety. Analysing the lives of saints, the texts about the veneration of relics and sacred objects, the reports of miracles, the author shows that in religious life in the Middle Ages “truth” was justified not by the experience, but by the transcendence, so the concepts of “falsification” and “gullibility” which arose in the era of Modernity are fraught with anachronism, that the border between “truth” and “deception” did not lie where it lies now, that the notion of the truth itself was relative and the views of the clerics and ordinary people could differ. On one hand, the whole medieval hagiography lied outside the problematic field of “true” / “false”, since fictional reports about the exploits and miracles of the saints, which we consider today as literary fiction, were an integral part of religious faith, a form of piety and were not suspicious. On the other hand, the official Church considered the miracles of the self-proclaimed saints or heretics to be a “deception” and warned against honoring the “false saints”. A single and an unambiguous concept of “cheating” did not exist in the medieval piety, so the researcher must distinguish the deception with the purpose of practical benefits (for example, the falsification of relics), the unintentional deception (delusion, fiction) or cheating with godly aim (pia fraus).
Keywords
medieval pietas, hagiography, deception (falsitas), criteria of truth, falsification, literary fiction, saints and “false saints”, “true” and “false” miracles, relics of saints
Received
19.06.2018
Publication date
31.10.2018
Number of characters
39819
Number of purchasers
35
Views
2126
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2018
2500 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Arnautova Yu. E. Kolduny i svyatye: antropologiya bolezni v Srednie veka. SPb., 2004.

2. Grigorij Turskij. Istoriya frankov / per. V. D. Savukovoj. M., 1987.

3. Karsavin L. P. Osnovy srednevekovoj religioznosti v XII—XIII vv., preimuschestvenno v Italii. Pg., 1915.

4. Salimbene de Adam. Khronika / sost. V. D. Savukova; per. s lat. I.S. Kultyshevoj, S. S. Prokopovich, V. D. Savukovoj, M. A. Tariverdievoj. M., 2004.

5. Berschin W. Biographie und Epochenstil im lateinischen Mittelalter. Stuttgart, 1999.

6. Delehaye H. Cinq lecons sur la methode hagiographique // Subsidia hagiographica 21. Bruxelles, 1906 (1968).

7. Falschungen im Mittelalter: Internationaler Kongress der Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Munchen, 16—19 September 1986 // Monumenta Germaniae Historica. Schriften. Bd. 33. Hannover, 1988.

8. Graus F. Volk, Herrscher und Heiliger im Reich der Merowinger. Praha, 1965.

9. Hucbaldi vita S. Lebvini // PL. 132. Coll. 877—894.

10. Lewison W. Das Werden der Ursula-Legende. Koln, 1928 (tekst S. Ursulae Passio (I). S. 142—157).

11. Libellus de Translatione Sankti Annonis Archiepiscopi et miracula Sankti Annonis / hg. von M. Mittler. Siegburg, 1966—1968.

12. Lupi Ferrariensis Vita S. Maximini // MGH. SS rer. Merov. Bd. 3. S. 71—82.

13. Notkerus Balbulus Gesta Karoli // Quellen zur Karolingischen Reichsgeschichte / hg. von F. Kurze, H. Haefele. Berlin, 1958. Bd. 3. S. 321—428.

14. Raoul Glaber. Historiarum libri quinque // Collection de textes pour servir a l’etude et a l’enseignement de l’histoire / ed. par M. Prou. P., 1886.

15. Sancti Odonis abbatis cluniacensis II de vita sancti Geraldi auriliacensis comitis libri quatuor // PL. T. 133. Coll. 640—709.

16. Schmitt J. C. Le saint levrer. Guinefort, guerisseur d’enfants depuis le XIII siecle. P., 1979.

17. Schreiner K. “Discrimen veri ac falsi”. Ansatz und Formen der Kritik in der Heiligen- und Reliquienverehrung des Mittelalters // Archiv fur Kulturgeschichte. 1966. Bd. 48. S. 1—53.

18. Schreiner K. Zum Wahrheitsverstandnis im Heiligen- und Reliquienwesen des Mittelalters // Saeculum. 1966. Bd. 17. S. 131—169.

19. Sudhoff K. Die heilsamen Eigenschaften des Magdalenenbalsams // Archiv fur Geschichte der Medizin. 1909. № 1. S. 388—390.

20. Vita Boniti episcopi Arverni // MGH. SS rer. Merov. T. VI. S. 110—139.

21. Vita Gangulfi Martyris Varennensis // MGH. SS rer. Merov. Bd. 7. (1). S. 155—169.