Forms of Development of the Past: History and Myth
Forms of Development of the Past: History and Myth
Annotation
PII
S207987840002231-3-1
DOI
10.18254/S0002231-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Marina Bobkova 
Affiliation: Institute of World History RAS. MGIMO University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract
This article analyzes such a segment of the mass consciousness of a modern society as a myth. The relationship between the concepts “history” and “myth” is researched. The definition of historical myth, falsification and distortion of history is given and justified. The main functions of history and historical myth are shown. Particular attention is paid to the study of the correlation of these concepts in mass historical consciousness and historical science.
Keywords
historical science, historical myth, mass historical consciousness, structure, historical writing, ideology, propaganda, historical knowledge
Received
26.03.2018
Publication date
30.07.2018
Number of characters
22709
Number of purchasers
36
Views
1571
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 rub. / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full version is available only to subscribers
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 rub. / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 rub. / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2018
2500 rub. / 50.0 SU

References



Дополнительные библиографические источники и материалы

  1. Bart R. Mif segodnya // R. Bart. Izbrannye raboty. Semiotika. Poehtika. M., 1989.
  2. Bobkova M. S. Informatsionnoe prostranstvo istorii // Lyudi i teksty. Istoricheskij al'manakh. Informatsionnoe prostranstvo istorii. M., 2014, S. 10-18.
  3. Bobkova M. S. Istoricheskie mify spetsial'no razvenchivat' ne nuzhno // Obzor [Ehlektronnyj resurs].   URL: http://obzor.io/2017/09/26/istoricheskie-mify-specialno-razvenchivat-ne-nuzhno-58262/#
  4. Bobkova M. S. , Vojtov N. V. Istoricheskij istochnik v nauke i medijnoj srede // Ehlektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel'nyj zhurnal «Istoriya». 2015. T. 6. Vypusk 7 (40) [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. Dostup dlya zaregistrirovannykh pol'zovatelej. URL: http://history.jes.su/s207987840001218-8-1 (data obrascheniya: 09.01.2018). DOI: 10.18254/S0001218-8-1
  5. Borovikova O. V. Problemy demarkatsii istoricheskoj nauki i istoricheskogo mifa v modernizme i postmodernizme // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. № 400. S. 33—39.
  6. Kotov V. N. K. Marks i F. Ehngel's o Rossii i russkom narode. M., 1953.
  7. Losev A. F. Dialektika mifa. M., 2001.
  8. Megill A. Istoricheskaya ehpistemologiya: Nauchnaya monografiya. M., 2007.
  9. Meletinskij E. M. Poehtika mifa. M., 1976.
  10. Nora P. Problematika mest pamyati // Frantsiya-pamyat'. SPb., 1999. S. 17—50.
  11. Syrov V. N. V chem zaklyuchaetsya spetsifika mifa? // Idei i idealy. 2011. № 4 (10). T. 1. S. 70—77.
  12. Syrov V. N. Obrecheny li istoricheskie narrativy byt' mifami? // Vek pamyati, pamyat' veka: Opyt obrascheniya s proshlym v XX stoletii. Sbornik statej. Chelyabinsk, 2004. S. 85—99.