Везде
A Concept “Istoriopisanie” in Russian-Speaking Academic History
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
A Concept “Istoriopisanie” in Russian-Speaking Academic History
Annotation
PII
S207987840001704-3-1
DOI
10.18254/S0001704-3-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Stanislav Mereminskiy 
Edition
Volume 8 Issue 2 (56)
Abstract
The article deals with a use of a concept "istoriopisanie" (Russian: historical writing) in contemporary Russian-speaking academic history. The author analyzes its background, various contexts of use, and its correspondence with other kindred concepts (historiography, historical knowledge etc.). It was concluded that, despite the increasing use of the concept "historical writing", it remains insufficiently defined.
Keywords
historical writing, historiography, historical term, concepts of academic history, professional communication
Received
25.01.2017
Publication date
28.03.2017
Number of characters
34084
Number of purchasers
43
Views
11155
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
200 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
800 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2017
Subscription benefits
2500 RUB / 50.0 SU

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. Bobkova M. S. Zapadnoevropejskoe istoriopisanie ehpokhi katastrof. M., 2008.
    2. 

  2. Bobkova M. S. Terminologicheskij instrumentarij istoricheskoj nauki: k postanovke problemy // Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya «Istoriya. Politologiya. Ehkonomika. Informatika». 2010. № 13. Vyp. 15. S. 102—108.
    3. 

  3. Vajnshtejn O. L. Istoriografiya srednikh vekov v svyazi s razvitiem istoricheskoj mysli ot nachala srednikh vekov do nashikh dnej. M.; L., 1940.
    4. 

  4. Vejnberg I. P. Rozhdenie istorii. Istoricheskaya mysl' na Blizhnem Vostoke serediny I tysyacheletiya do n. eh. M., 1993.
    5. 

  5. Vyazemskij P. A. Staraya zapisnaya knizhka. M., 2003. S. 239.
    6. 

  6. Gene B. Istoriya i istoricheskaya kul'tura srednevekovogo Zapada. M., 2002.
    7. 

  7. Gimon T. V. Istoriopisanie rannesrednevekovoj Anglii i Drevnej Rusi: Sravnitel'noe issledovanie. M., 2012.
    8. 

  8. Doronin B. G. Organizatsiya gosudarstvennogo istoriopisaniya v Kitae v XVII—XVIII vv. // Istoriografiya i istochnikovedenie istorii stran Azii i Afriki. Vyp. 9. L., 1986. S. 98—127.
    9. 

  9. Drevnejshie gosudarstva Vostochnoj Evropy. 2013 g.: Zarozhdenie istoriopisaniya v obschestvakh Drevnosti i Srednevekov'ya. M., 2016.
    10. 

  10. Malovichko S. I., Rumyantseva M. F. Istoriya kak strogaya nauka vs sotsial'no orientirovannoe istoriopisanie. Orekhovo-Zuevo, 2013.
    11. 

  11. Menschikov I. S. Istoriopisanie/istoriografiya: k voprosu o sootnoshenii ponyatij (vmesto predisloviya) // Metodologicheskie aspekty sovremennogo istoriopisaniya i istoricheskoj lokalistiki. Kurgan, 2011. S. 3—4.
    12. 

  12. Mereminskij S. G. Formirovanie traditsii: anglijskoe istoriopisanie vtoroj poloviny XI — pervoj poloviny XII vv. M., 2016.
    13. 

  13. Popova T. N. Liki istoriografii: imena i smysly // Spetsіal'nі іstorichnі distsiplіni: pitannya teorії ta metodiki. Chislo 5: Іstorіografіchnі doslіdzhennya v Ukraїnі. Vip. 10: Ob’єdnanij vipusk zbіrnikіv nauk. prats' na poshanu akademіka Valerіya Andrіjovicha Smolіya. Ch. 2. K., 2000. S. 415—434.
    14. 

  14. Sevast'yanova A. A. Russkaya provintsial'naya istoriografiya vtoroj poloviny XVIII v. M., 1998. 
    15. 

  15. Semenov Yu. I. Filosofiya istorii. M., 2003.
    16. 

  16. Smolin G. Ya. Antifeodal'nye vosstaniya v Kitae vtoroj poloviny X — pervoj chetverti XII v. M., 1974.
    17. 

  17. Surikov I. E. Ocherki ob istoriopisanii v klassicheskoj Gretsii. M., 2011. 
    18. 

  18. Tartakovskij A. G. Russkaya memuaristika XVIII — 1-j poloviny XIX vv. M., 1991.
    19. 

  19. Frolov Eh. D. Fakel Prometeya. Ocherki antichnoj obschestvennoj mysli. L., 1981.
    20. 

  20. Chala O. Istoriopisannya // Іstorіografіchnij slovnik / za red. S. І. Posokhova. Kharkiv, 2004. S. 102—105.
    21. 

  21. Shmidt S. O. Razmyshleniya ob «istoriografii istoriografii» // Istoricheskie zapiski. M., 2005. T. 8. S. 296—363.
    22. 

  22. Baker P. S. Textual Boundaries in Anglo-Saxon Works on Time (and in some Old English poems) // Studies in English Language and Literature. “Doubt Wisely”: Papers in Honour of E. G. Stanley. London, 1996. P. 445—456.
    23. 

  23. Catalogi veteres librorum qui in Ecclesiae Cathedralis Dunelm. Catalogues of the Library of Durham Cathedral / ed. T. Rud. Surtees Society. Vol. 7. London, 1838. 
    24. 

  24. Chibnall M. Forgery in Narrative Charters // Fälschungen im Mittelalter. Hannover, 1988. Bd. 4. S. 331—347.
    25. 

  25. Lifshitz F. Beyond Positivism and Genre: “Hagiographic” Texts as Historical Narrative // Viator, 1994. Vol. 25. P. 95—114.
    26. 

  26. Liber Eliensis / ed. by E. O. Blake. Camden 3rd ser. Vol. 92. London, 1962.
    27. 

  27. Textus Roffensis / ed. by P. Sawyer. 2 vols. Copehagen, 1957—1962.
    28. 

  28. Wickham C. Lawyers’ Time: History and Memory in Tenth- and Eleventh-Century Italy // Land and Power: Studies in Italian and European Social History, 400—1200. London, 1994. P. 275—293.
    29. 

  29. Wormald P. Laga Eadwardi: The Textus Roffensis and its Context // Anglo-Norman Studies. 1994. Vol. 17. P. 243—266.
    30.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate