Везде
Different Interpretations of the Term “Cede” in the Treaty Concerning the Cession of the Russian Possessions in North America by His Majesty the Emperor of All the Russias to the United States of America
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Different Interpretations of the Term “Cede” in the Treaty Concerning the Cession of the Russian Possessions in North America by His Majesty the Emperor of All the Russias to the United States of America
Annotation
PII
S207987840001675-1-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Aleksandr Ivolgin 
Edition
Volume 7 Issue 4 (48)
Abstract
The Treaty concerning the Cession of the Russian Possessions in North America, concluded almost 150 years ago by the Russian Empire and the United States of America, still gives rise to debates about its legitimacy, all the more fierce as the Russian sovereignty over the Alaska peninsula has left the most deep traces both in the social-political and the cultural life of this vast territory. Different interpretations of the Treaty are fuelled not only by the objective geopolitical circumstances that its conclusion had for Russia and the U.S., but also by the linguistic peculiarities of its text, the ambiguous definition of the key notion “cede” being among them. Nevertheless, the analysis of the Treaty from the perspective of the norms of international law of the 19th century indicates its legitimacy and establishes the inconsistency of both the contemporary Russian public initiatives on reincorporating the peninsula under the sovereignty of Moscow, and the claims of the representatives of Alaska Natives regarding the illegality of the document. This fact, however, does not negate the need for cooperation between governments and public organizations of Russia and the United States so as to settle the regional territorial disputes around certain lands (such as Spruce Island) and to preserve the Russian material heritage in the peninsula, which largely determines the Alaskan identity.
Keywords
Russian America, Alaska, history, delineation of areas, international agreement, concession, legitimacy, public initiative
Received
05.06.2016
Publication date
14.09.2016
Number of characters
48813
Number of purchasers
12
Views
10130
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
200 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
800 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2016
Subscription benefits
2500 RUB / 50.0 SU

References



Additional sources and materials

    

  1. “Alaska of utmost strategic importance for United States and NATO.” NATO Parliamentary Assembly. Accessed February 25, 2016, http://www.nato-pa.int/default.asp?SHORTCUT=3570
    2. 

  2. Alaskan Independence Party website. Accessed February 25, 2016, http://www.akip.org/faqs.html
    3. 

  3. Archive of Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire, Fond of the Russian American Company, dossier 399, pp. 9–10; dossier 412, pp. 1–2; dossier 414, p. 16.
    4. 

  4. Archive of Foreign Policy of the Russian Empire, Main Fond, I–9, 1857–1868, dossier 4, pp. 3–4.
    5. 

  5. Barker, David. “Was the Alaska Purchase a Good Deal?” Manuscript, University of Iowa, 2009.
    6. 

  6. Beckman R., and Butte, D. “Introduction to International Law.” International Law Students Association (2009): 2. Accessed March 20, 2016, https://www.ilsa.org/jessup/intlawintro.pdf
    7. 

  7. Bolkhovitinov N. N., ed. Istoriia Russkoi Ameriki (1732-1867) (The History of Russian America), vol. 3: Russkaia Amerika: ot zenita k zakatu, 1825-1867 (Russian America: From Zenith to Decline, 1825-1867). Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 1999.
    8. 

  8. Bolkhovitinov N. N. Rossiya otkryvaet Ameriku, 1732–1799.(Russia Discovers America, 1732–1799) Moscow: Nauka, 1991: 13.
    9. 

  9. Bolkhovitinov N. N. Russko-amerikanskie otnosheniya i prodazha Alyaski 1834-1867 (Russian-American Relations and the Sale of Alaska) Moscow: Nauka, 1990: 368 p.
    10. 

  10. Bulatov, Y.A. “Kto i zachem prodal Russkuju Ameriku” (WhosoldRussianAmericaandwhy). Mezhdunarodnaja zhizn' 4 2015: 124-148.
    11. 

  11. Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary
    12. 

  12. Charles Cheney Hyde, International Law Chiefly as Interpreted and Applied by the United States, Vol. 1. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1947: 358–385.
    13. 

  13. Dal, V.I. Tolkovyj slovar' zhivogo velikoruusskogo jazyka (Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language), vol. 3. Saint-Petersburg: Tip. Tovarishhestva M.O. Vol'f, 1909: 1253.
    14. 

  14. Dal, V.I. Tolkovyj slovar' zhivogo velikoruusskogo jazyka (Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language), vol. 4. Saint-Petersburg: Tip. Tovarishhestva M.O. Vol'f, 1909: 1084.
    15. 

  15. Davidson, MarshallB. “ARoyalWelcome for the Russian Navy.” American Heritage Magazine 11 (4) (1960): 38.
    16. 

  16. Farrow, Lee A., Seward's Folly: A New Look at the Alaska Purchase. University of Alaska Press, 2016:  220 p. 
    17. 

  17. Federal Law No. 129-FZ of 8 August 2001 on State Registration of Legal Persons and Individual Entrepreneurs (as amended to 29 December 2012), http://ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/93495/109325/F2133654464/RUS93495.pdf
    18. 

  18. Freeman, Curtis J. “Alaska's Claim in the Mining Industry.” Engineering & Mining Journal 203 (10) (2002): 18.
    19. 

  19. Helfer, Laurence R. “Terminating Treaties.” In The Oxford Guide to Treaties, edited by Duncan Hollis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012: 634–650.
    20. 

  20. “Internet Movement for Denunciation of the 1867 Treaty Concerning the Cession of the Russian Possessions in North America and Reestablishment of the Russian–American company.” VK.com, http://vk.com/club65399375
    21. 

  21. Mason, Mike. “Alaska Senate Opposes Creation Of Beringia International Park.” Alaska Public Media, February 19, 2014. Accessed March 19, 2016, http://www.alaskapublic.org/2014/02/19/alaska-senate-opposes-creation-of-beringia-international-park/
    22. 

  22. “Native peoples' group seeks end to 'US occupation' of Alaska, Hawaii.” RT.com, May 08, 2015. Accessed February 25, 2016, http://rt.com/usa/256781-alaska-hawaii-self-determination/
    23. 

  23. Oxford Dictionary of English, Oxford University Press: 2010.
    24. 

  24. Petrov A.Y. “Finansovo-hozjajstvennaja dejatel'nost' Rossijsko-amerikanskoj kompanii (1841 – 1867)” (Financial and Economic Activity ofthe Russian-American Company (1841 – 1867)). Upravlenie sobstvennost'ju 2 (7) 2005: 47-62.
    25. 

  25. Petrov A.Y.Nataliia Shelikhova u istokov Russkoi Russkoi Ameriki (Natalia Shelikhova at the Origins of Russian America)Moscow: Ves' Mir, 2012: 164–80.
    26. 

  26. Petrov A.Y. “Vzaimodejstvie Rossii i Soedinjonnyh Shtatov na Severo-Zapade Ameriki v nachale XIX veka.” (Interaction between the United States and Russia in the Northwest of America in the early 19th century). Novaja i Novejshaja Istorija(5) 2013: 170-182.
    27. 

  27. Podosenov, Sergej. “Chinovniki DFO prizyvajut vernut' RPC prinadlezhashhij SShA ostrov” (Officials of the Far Eastern Federal District call for returning the island, owned by the U.S., to the Russian Orthodox Church) Izvestia, March 26, 2014. Accessed March 3, 2016, http://izvestia.ru/news/568092
    28. 

  28. Talalayev, A. N. Pravo mezhdunarodnyh dogovorov. Tom 1: Obshhie voprosy, (Law of International Agreements, Vol. 1: General Considerations) edited by L. N. Shestakov. Moscow: Zercalo, 2011: 22.
    29. 

  29. The Alaska State Legislature, http://www.legis.state.ak.us/PDF/28/Bills/HB0216B.PDF
    30. 

  30. Tkachenko B. I. “Uzlovye problemy morskoj ekonomicheskoj granicy mezhdu Rossiej i SShA.” (Key Problems of the Maritime Economic Border between
    31. 

  31. Russia and the USA) Problems of National Strategy 3 (8) (2011): 23–39.
    32. 

  32. Webster, Noah, Webster's Academic Dictionary; A Dictionary of the English Language.New York, Cincinnati American Book Company; Springfield,Mass., G. & C. Merriam Co., 1895: 98, 100, 493, 506. 
    33. 

  33. Whitney, William Dwight, The Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia, vol. 1, 2, 6, 7. New York: The Century Co., 1889: 875, 904, 5310, 5480
    34.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate