Structures and Statuses of Polities in the English Intellectual Discourse of the Early 17th Century
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Structures and Statuses of Polities in the English Intellectual Discourse of the Early 17th Century
Annotation
PII
S207987840032423-4-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Anastasia Palamarchuk 
Affiliation: Institute of Oriental Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia
Address: Republic of Armenia, Yerevan
Abstract

The article discusses the representation of the genesis, development and structures of complex polities in the treaties of the English intellectuals of the early Seventeenth century.  The key notions used by the authors of antiquarian and historical-legal treatises are the following: “empire”, “sovereign kingdom” and “subordinated kingdom” (this term was applied to polities where the title of king remained a feudal dignity). The history of polities of various genesis and status, reconstructed in the treatises of the Early Stuart antiquarians and lawyers, was intended to demonstrate the dynamic nature of these states, which implied a potential change of status in concrete historical conditions.

Keywords
unions, composite monarchy, antiquarian discourse, the Stuarts, England
Источник финансирования
Grant 24SSAH-6A020 of Higher Education and Science Committee, Republic of Armenia: “European Monarchies in the Sixteenth and Eighteenth centuries: Institutes and concepts”.
Received
27.05.2024
Publication date
16.09.2024
Number of characters
21743
Number of purchasers
5
Views
89
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2024

References

1. Vinokurova M. Custom as a Base of a Legal Precedent in the Process of the English Medieval Law’s Formation // ISTORIYA. 2020. Vol. 11. Is. 10 (96). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840011186-3-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840011186-3

2. Palamarchuk A. Community and Its Structure in the Local Antiquarian Writing in the 17th Century // ISTORIYA. 2023. Vol. 14. Is. 7 (129). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840027474-0-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840027474-0

3. Palamarchuk A. A., Terent'eva E. A., Fedorov S. E. Rozhdenie natsional'nogo istoriopisaniya v Anglii i Frantsii. SPb., 2021.

4. Fedorov S. E., Palamarchuk A. A. Britanskaya kompozitarnaya monarkhiya: verkhovnaya vlast' i ehtnokul'turnye protsessy // Novoe i novejshee vremya. 2022. Vyp. 5. S. 34—45.

5. Fedorov S. E., Palamarchuk A. A. Lord Klarendon i antikvarnoe istoriopisanie // Dialog so vremenem. 2020. № 73. S. 200—209.

6. Armitage D. The Ideological Origins of the British Empire. Cambridge, 2000.

7. Armitage D. Theories of Empire 1450—1800. Abingdon, 1998.

8. Brackmann R. The Elizabethan Invention of Anglo-Saxon England. Lawrence Nowell, William Lambarde and the Study of Old English. Cambridge, 2012.

9. Goetz H. W. The Concept of Time in the Historiography of the Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries // Medieval Concepts of the Past. Ritual, Memory, Historiography / ed. by G. Althoff, J. Fried, P. Geary. Washington, 2002. P. 139—166.

10. Hower J. Tudor Empire. The Making of early Modern Britain and the British Atlantic World, 1485—1603. Basingstoke, 2020.

11. Muldoon J. Empire and Order. The Concept of Empire, 800-1800. Basingstoke, 1999.

12. Nederman, C. J. Translatio Imperii: Medieval and Modern // Lineages of European Political Thought: Explorations along the Medieval/Modern Divide from John of Salisbury to Hegel / ed. by C. J. Nederman. Washington, 2009. P. 177—189.

13. Russel C. Composite Monarchies in Early Modern Europe. The British and Irish Example // Uniting the Kingdom? The Making of British History. / ed. by A. Grant, K. Stringer. L., 1995. P. 133—146.

14. The Old Historians of the Isle of Man. Camden, Speed, Dugdale, Cox, Wilson, Willia and Grose / ed. by W. Harris. Manx Society. Vol. XVIII. Douglas, 1871.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate