The Union of the Crowns of France and England: an Alternative Version by Jean Jouvénal des Ursins
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
The Union of the Crowns of France and England: an Alternative Version by Jean Jouvénal des Ursins
Annotation
PII
S207987840031679-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Susanna Tsaturova 
Affiliation: Institute of World History RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

The French monarchy was the model of a strong centralized state in medieval Western Europe. At the same time it was formed as a national state and relied on the active promotion of national identity. In this context the treaty of Troyes in 1420 on the union of France and England under the rule of the English monarchs looks like a ridiculous and inept attempt to end the long-standing conflict, referred to in historiography as the Hundred Years’ War. However, the “union of two crowns” was not perceived by contemporaries as absurd. A vivid confirmation of this is the alternative union plan proposed by Jean Juvénal des Ursins, which is analyzed in detail in the article for the first time. Jouvénal was the closest counsellor to Charles VII of Valois, a high-ranking official, lawyer and hierarch of the Church. He made the greatest contribution to discrediting the treaty of Troyes by finding a copy of the text of the Salic law. Two treatises in which he developed this plan were written in 1435—1445. By that time France had already won its main military and political victories. This fact speaks in favor of the author’s conviction in the benefits of such a union. According to Jouvénal, the union of two crowns should have come under the rule of the French King Charles VII, since the English monarchs, Edward III and Henry IV of Lancaster, came to power illegally by killing legitimate kings, Edward II and Richard II. The main goal of Jouvénal’s alternative project was to ensure a reliable peace and an end to the war.

Keywords
The Hundred Years War 1337—1453, the French monarchy, the Treaty of Troyes 1420, the Union, Jean Jouvénal des Ursins
Received
03.05.2024
Publication date
16.09.2024
Number of characters
38809
Number of purchasers
5
Views
76
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2024

References

1. Krom M. M. Gosudarstva rannego Novogo vremeni: obscheevropejskaya model' i regional'nye razlichiya // Novaya i Novejshaya istoriya. 2016. № 4. S. 3—15.

2. Tilli Ch. Prinuzhdenie, kapital i evropejskie gosudarstva, 990—1992 / per. s angl. T. B. Menskaya. M., 2009.

3. Tsaturova S. Can History be Not Political? The Phenomenon of Nina Aleksandrovna Khachaturyan // ISTORIYA. 2023. Vol. 14. Is. 7 (129). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840027478-4-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840027478-4

4. Tsaturova S. K. O pol'ze prezentizma, ili kak izuchat' istoki natsional'nogo gosudarstva v ozhidanii ego otmiraniya // Dialog so vremenem. Al'manakh intellektual'noj istorii. 2018. № 65. S. 59—72.

5. Armstrong C. A. J. La double monarchie France-Angleterre et la Maison de Bourgogne (1420—1435). Le déclin de l’alliance // Annales de Bourgogne. 1965. No. 37. P. 81—112.

6. Bossuat A. Le Parlement de Paris pendant l’occupation anglais // Revue historique. 1963. T. 229. R. 19—40.

7. Contamine Ph. Charles VII, les Français et la paix, 1420—1435 // Comptes rendus des séances de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres. 1993. T. 137. No. 1. P. 9—23.

8. Cosneau E. Les grands traités de la guerre de Cent Ans. P., 1889.

9. Daly K., Giesey R. E. Noël de Fribois et la loi salique // Bibliothèque de l’École des chartes. 1993. T. 151. No. 1. P. 5—36.

10. Dufour A. Le retour de l’histoire politique // Histoire de France, historiens de la France: Actes du colloque international, Reims, 14 et 15 mai 1993 / publ. Y. -M. Bercé et Ph. Contamine. P., 1994. P. 315—324.

11. Genet J. -Ph. La typologie de l’État moderne, le droit, l’espace // L’État moderne: le droit, l’espace et les formes de l’État. P., 1990. P. 7—14.

12. Giordanengo G. De l’usage du droit privé et du droit public au Moyen Âge // Cahiers de recherches médiévales et humanistes. 2000. No. 7. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http:crm.revues.org/880 DOI:10.4000/crm.880

13. Grévin B. La Première Loi du royaume. L’acte de fixation de la majorité des rois de France (1374). P., 2021.

14. Grévy-Pons N. Propagande et sentiment national pendant le règne de Charles VI: exemple de Jean de Montreuil // Francia. Bd. 8 (1980). München, 1981. P. 127—145.

15. Hildesheimer F., Morgat-Bonnet M. La Parlement de Paris. Histoire d’un grand corps de l’État monarchique, XIIIe—XVIIIe siècle. P., 2018.

16. Juvénal des Ursins J. Écrits politiques / éd. P. S. Lewis. 3 vols. P., 1978, 1985, 1992.

17. Krynen J. Naturel. Essai sur l’argument de la Nature dans la pensée politique à la fin du Moyen Âge // Journal des savants. 1982. P. 169—190.

18. Lewis P. S. La “France anglaise” vue de la “France française” // “La France Anglaise” au Moyen âge: Colloque des historiens médiévistes français et britanniques: Actes du 111e Congrès nationale des sociétés savants, Poitiers, 1986. Section d’histoire médiévale et de philologie. T. I. P., 1988. P. 31—39.

19. Pons N. La propagande de guerre française avant l’apparition de Jeanne d’Arc // Journal des savants. 1982. P. 191—213.

20. Strayer J. Les origines médiévales de l’État moderne / trad. M. Clément. P., 1979.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate