“The Leading Ones” and “Kings”: What Did Manetho Know About the Political Disintegration of the Second Intermediate Period, and How Did He Express This Knowledge?
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
“The Leading Ones” and “Kings”: What Did Manetho Know About the Political Disintegration of the Second Intermediate Period, and How Did He Express This Knowledge?
Annotation
PII
S207987840024518-8-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Alexander Nemirovsky 
Affiliation:
Institute of World History RAS
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

The paper treats expressions in which Manetho’s narrative about the Hyksos period, known in literal quotation and detailed retelling by Josephus, describes the actors of power in Egypt at different phases of this period. On the eve of Hyksos invasion, according to Manetho, there was one king in Egypt and “the hegemonizing ones” (rulers, leaders) who stand apart from him in the context, and analysis of the text shows that they are the local rulers who performed quasi-independence under the nominal sovereignty of kings of a certain dynasty. In the phase of Hyksos control over all of Egypt, the Hyksos kings of Avaris are depicted as supreme rulers over the “kings of Thebaid” and “[kings] of other Egyptian lands” who are titularly equated with their Hyksos overlords by Manetho; at some point they overthrow the Hyksos yoke and begin the war against Avaris. By the end of this struggle, by Manetho, only the Theban kings are acting on the Egyptian side. This picture largely coincides with real history (the fragmentation of Egypt before the emergence of the Avaris kingdom and at the times of its hegemony; the division of all of Egypt between Avaris kingdom and the Theban kingdom independent of it in the last phase before the fall of Avaris). This reveals Manetho's high awareness of the real situation of the Second Intermediate Period; some primary sources of this awareness were probably inscriptions and literary compositions that directly reflected the interaction between various local rulers contemporaneous to each other.

Keywords
Manetho, Hyksos, Avaris, Thebes, SIP, disintegration
Received
21.12.2022
Publication date
15.03.2023
Number of characters
61640
Number of purchasers
15
Views
231
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2023

References

1. Banschikova A. A. Perelomnye ehpokhi v istoricheskoj traditsii i soznanii drevnikh egiptyan. M., 2014.

2. Banschikova A. A. Istoriopisanie bez istorii: Egipetskoe vospriyatie proshlogo i ego fiksatsiya // Drevnejshie gosudarstva Vostochnoj Evropy. 2013. Zarozhdenie istoriopisaniya v obschestvakh Drevnosti i Srednevekov'ya. M., 2016. S. 25—37.

3. Filon Aleksandrijskij. Protiv Flakka. O posol'stve k Gayu. Iosif Flavij. O drevnosti evrejskogo naroda. Protiv Apiona (Biblioteka Flaviana 3). M., 1994.

4. Ladynin I. A. Legenda o tsare Amenofise (Manetho, ed. W.G. Waddell, frg. 54, Chaeremon, FGrHist. 618. F. 1) i final vtorogo tomosa truda Manefona // Peterburgskie egiptologicheskie chteniya 2007—2008. SPb., 2009. S. 164—180.

5. Ladynin I. A. Tsikly egipetskoj istorii i tri tomosa truda Manefona Sevennitskogo (I) // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 2015. № 4. S. 8—21.

6. Ladynin I. A. Tsikly egipetskoj istorii i tri tomosa truda Manefona Sevennitskogo (II) // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 2016. № 2. S. 315—340.

7. Ladynin I. A. «Snova pravit Egipet!» Nachalo ehllinisticheskogo vremeni v kontseptsiyakh i konstruktakh pozdneegipetskikh istoriografii i propagandy. M., 2017.

8. Ladynin I. A., Nemirovskij A. A. Manefon i ego trud v novom monograficheskom issledovanii // Vestnik drevnej istorii. 2018. № 78. S. 1032—1052.

9. Nemirovskij A. A. Skazka ob Apopi i Sekenenra: problema zaversheniya i interpretatsii syuzheta // Scripta Antiqua. T. V. M., 2016. S. 132—166.

10. Nemirovskij A. A. «Pastukhi i fivantsy». Vydelenie i prodolzhitel'nost' dinastij giksosskogo vremeni (XV—XVII) v trude Manefona. M., 2019.

11. Nemirovskij A. A. Odno koptskoe predanie ob osnovanii Aleksandrii: pamyat' glubinoj v dve tysyachi let // Mare Nostrum. 1. M., 2019. S. 5—57.

12. Turaev B. A. Istoriya drevnego Vostoka. I—II. L., 1935.

13. Khrestomatiya po istorii Drevnego Vostoka. Ch. 1. M., 1980.

14. Flavius Josephus: Against Apion. Translation and Commentary / ed. Barclay J. Leiden, 2007.

15. Beckerath J. von. Untersuchungen zur politischen Geschichte der Zweiten Zwischenzeit in Ägypten. Glückstadt, 1964.

16. Brill’s New Jacoby. (Die Fragmente der griechischen Historiker, Felix Jakoby). [Ehlektronnyj resurs] URL: https://scholarlyeditions.brill.com/bnjo/ (data obrascheniya: 08.01. 2023).

17. Bülow-Jacobsen A. The Abdication of Toutimaios? // Ryholt 1997. P. 327—329.

18. Digital Fragmenta Historicorum Graecorum (Karl Müller). [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.dfhg-project.org/ (data obrascheniya: 08.01.2023).

19. Dillery J. Clio's Other Sons: Berossus and Manetho, with an afterword on Demetrius. Ann Arbor, 2015.

20. The Hyksos Ruler Khyan and the Early Second Intermediate Period in Egypt: Problems and Priorities of Current Research / eds. Forstner-Müller I., Moelle N. Wien, 2018.

21. Forstner-Müller I. The Hyksos State // The Oxford History of the Ancient Near East. Vol. 3. Oxford, 2022. P. 1—47.

22. Franke D. The Late Middle Kingdom (Thirteenth to Seventeenth Dynasties): The Chronological Framework // Journal of Egyptian History. 2008. No. 1. P. 267—287.

23. Gozzoli R. B. The Writing of History in Ancient Egypt during the First Millenium B.C. (ca. 1070—180 BC). Trends and Perspectives. L., 2006.

24. Grajetzki W. The Middle Kingdom and Second Intermediate Period // The Oxford Handbook of Egyptology / eds. Ian Shaw, E. Bloxam. Oxford, 2020. P. 638—656.

25. Ilin-Tomich A. The Theban kingdom of Dynasty 16: its rise, administration and politics // Journal of Egyptian History. 2014. No. 7. P. 143—193.

26. Ilin-Tomich A. Second Intermediate Period // UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology / ed. W. Wendrich. Los Angeles, 2016.

27. UCLA Library Digital Collections. [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz002k7jm9

28. Liddell H. G., Scott R. Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford, 1996.

29. Loprieno A. Views of the Past in Egypt During the First Millennium BC // Tait 2003. P. 139—154.

30. Mahieu B. The Identities of the Second Intermediate Period Dynasties in Egypt // Journal of Egyptian History. 2021. No. 14. P. 170—202.

31. Manassa C. Imagining the Past: Historical Fiction in New Kingdom Egypt. Oxford, 2013.

32. Manetho = Waddell 1940.

33. Maspero G. History of Egypt, Chaldea, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria. Vol. 4. L., 1901.

34. Miniaci G. Through Change and Tradition: The Rise of Thebes during the Second Intermediate Period // Aegyptiaca et Coptica: Studi in onore di Sergio Pernigotti / eds. Buzi P., Picchi D., Tecchi M. Oxford, 2011. P. 235—249.

35. Müller Vera. Chronological Concepts for the Second Intermediate Period and Their Implications for the Evaluation of Its Material Culture // Forstner-Müller, Moeller 2018. P. 199—216.

36. Petrie W. M. F. A History of Egypt, from the Earliest Kings to the XVIth Dynasty. L., 1894.

37. Polz D. Upper Egypt before the New Kingdom // The Oxford History of the Ancient Near East. Vol. 3. Oxford, 2022. P. 48—100.

38. Polz D., Seiler A. Die Pyramidenanlage des Königs Nub-Cheper-Re Intef in Dra' Abu el-Naga. Mainz am Rhein, 2003.

39. Redford D. B. Egypt, Canaan, and Israel in Ancient Times. Princeton, 1992.

40. Redford D. B. Pharaonic King-Lists, Annals, and Day-Books: A Contribution to the Study of the Egyptian Sense of History. Mississauga, 1986.

41. Redford D. B. Textual Sources for the Hyksos Period // The Hyksos: New Historical and Archaeological Perspectives / E. D. Oren (ed.). Philadelphia, 1997. P. 1—44.

42. Ryholt K. The Political Situation in Egypt during the Second Intermediate Period. Copenhagen, 1997.

43. Ryholt K. Egyptian Historical Literature from the Greco-Roman Period // Das Ereignis: Geschichtsschreibung zwischen Vorfall und Befund / ed. M. Fitzenreiter. L., 2009. S. 231—238.

44. Schneider T. Ausländer in Ägypten während des Mittleren Reiches und der Hyksoszeit. Teil 1: Die ausländischen Könige. Wiesbaden, 1998.

45. Schneider T. The Relative Chronology of the Middle Kingdom and the Hyksos Period (Dynasties 12—17) // Ancient Egyptian Chronology / eds. E. Hornung, R. Krauss, D. A. Warburton. Leiden, 2006. P. 168—196.

46. Schneider T. Das Ende der kurzen Chronologie: Eine kritische Bilanz der Debatte zur absoluten Datierung des Mittleren Reiches und der Zweiten Zwischenzeit // Ägypten und Levante. 2008.No. 18. S. 275—313.

47. Seters van J. The Hyksos: A New Investigation. New Haven, 1966.

48. Siesse J. La XIIIe dynastie: histoire de la fin du Moyen Empire égyptien. P., 2019.

49. “Never Had the Like Occurred”: Egypt's View of the Past / ed. Tait J. L., 2003.

50. Flavius Josephus. The Life. Against Apion / ed. Thackeray H. St. J. Cambridge, Mass., 1926.

51. Manetho / ed/. Waddell W. G. L., 1940.

52. Willems H. Egypt’s Middle Kingdom: a view from within // The Oxford History of the Ancient Near East. Vol. 3. Oxford, 2022. P. 656—727.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate