Везде
Nobilitas in the 16th — 17th Centuries Antiquarian Discourse and Emergence of the Social
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Nobilitas in the 16th — 17th Centuries Antiquarian Discourse and Emergence of the Social
Annotation
PII
S207987840021843-6-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840021843-6
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Sergey Fyodorov 
Affiliation: Saint Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
Edition
Volume 13 Issue 6 (116)
Abstract

More or less persistent tendency towards a coherent description and classification of nobility and more broadly — of social groups within the Early modern British society is inseparably connected with the Sixteenth — Seventeenth Centuries antiquarian tradition. Within the same tradition occurs so called epistemological turn which leads to a discursive fragmentation of social order as well as social groups which form its entirety and complexity. The antiquarian framing of all complexities of social order was based not only on abandoning of an idea of institutional entity — crucial for the medieval corporal theory but also on introducing a particular group-wide characteristic features. Such features offered the challenge for remodeling of ancient regime with consideration to diversity which is innate for social indicia. 

Keywords
the 16th — 17th centuries England, antiquarian discourse, nobility, corporation, social groups
Received
26.07.2022
Publication date
31.08.2022
Number of characters
14401
Number of purchasers
17
Views
352
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should pay the subscribtion

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Subscription benefits
200 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue and additional services
Subscription benefits
920 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues and additional services for 2022
Subscription benefits
5000 RUB / 50.0 SU

References

1. Palamarchuk A. English Civilians and the Concept of Absolute Power // ISTORIYA. 2016. Vol. 7. Issue 2 (46). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840001413-3-1/

2. Palamarchuk A. Composite Monarchy and Legal Polymorphism in Early Stuart England: a Problem Statement // ISTORIYA. 2018. Vol. 9. Issue 1 (65). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840002041-4-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S0002041-4-1

3. Palamarchuk A. Conciliarism in Theory and Practice of Legal Institutions and Administration in England in the 11th — 16th Centuries // ISTORIYA. 2020. Vol. 11. Issue 10 (96). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840011638-0-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840011638-0

4. Palamarchuk A. A., Terent'eva E. A., Fedorov S. E. Rozhdenie natsional'nogo istoriopisaniya v Anglii i Frantsii. SPb: Izdatel'skij Dom SPbGU, 2021.

5. Palamarchuk A. A., Fedorov S. E. Antikvarnyj diskurs v rannestyuartovskoj Anglii. SPb: Aletejya, 2015.

6. Fyodorov S. Power as a Public Process // ISTORIYA. 2022. Vol. 13. Issue 1 (111). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840019082-9-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840019082-9

7. Fedorov S. E. Korolevskaya sem'ya i tseremonial'noe prostranstvo rannestyuartovskoj monarkhii. SPb: Aletejya, 2018.

8. Fedorov S. E. O nekotorykh osobennostyakh predstavlenij ob aristokratii v Anglii rannego Novogo vremeni // Problemy sotsial'noj istorii i kul'tury srednikh vekov i rannego Novogo vremeni. 2000. № 2. S. 160—179.

9. Fedorov S. E. Personal'nyj sostav elizavetinskoj titulovannoj znati: materialy k gruppovoj prosopografii // Problemy sotsial'noj istorii i kul'tury srednikh vekov i rannego Novogo vremeni. 2003. №4. S. 218—245.

10. Fedorov S. E. Poryadok predpochteniya titulovannykh osob i dolzhnostnykh lits v rannestyuartovskoj Anglii // Problemy sotsial'noj istorii i kul'tury srednikh vekov i rannego Novogo vremeni. 2001. № 3. S. 250—274.

11. Fedorov S. E. Pehrskoe pravo: normativnaya praktika v Anglii rannego Novogo vremeni // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenij. Pravovedenie. 1996. №2. S. 124—130.

12. Fedorov S. E. Rannestyuartovskaya aristokratiya. 1603—1629. SPb: Aletejya, 2005.

13. Fedorov S. E. Universalizm vs ehtnotsentrizm: imperiya i monarkhii k iskhodu srednikh vekov // Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenij. Pravovedenie. 2012. № 6. S. 176—189.

14. Fedorov S. E., Palamarchuk A. A. Istoricheskaya pamyat' i tekhnologii antikvarnogo diskursa v Anglii rannego Novogo vremeni // Dialog so vremenem: pamyat' o proshlom v istoricheskom kontekste / red. L. P. Repina. M., 2008. S. 495—521.

15. Fedorov S. E., Palamarchuk A. A. Proshloe krupnym planom: temporal'nye izmereniya v antikvarnom diskurse // Obrazy vremeni i istoricheskie predstavleniya: Rossiya — Vostok — Zapad / red. L. P. Repina. M., 2010. S. 226—244.

16. Khachaturyan N. A. Vlast' i obschestvo v Zapadnoj Evrope v srednie veka. M: Nauka, 2008.

17. Canning J. P. Law, Sovereignty and corporarion theory, 1300—1450 // The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought, c. 350 — c.450 / ed. J. H. Burns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. P. 454—476.

18. Cust R. Charles I and the Aristocracy, 1625—1642. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

19. Maitland F. W. State, Trust and Corporation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

20. Ullmann W. Principles of Government and Politics in the Middle Ages. N. Y.: Routledge, 2010.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate