Cognitive Dimension of Historical Memory in Paul Ricoeur's Concept
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
Cognitive Dimension of Historical Memory in Paul Ricoeur's Concept
Annotation
PII
S207987840016875-1-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840016875-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Alexandr Mordvinov 
Affiliation: Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Address: Russian Federation, Nizhniy Novgorod
Ksenia Igaeva
Affiliation: Minin Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University
Address: Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod
Abstract

The article considers Paul Ricoeur's concept of historical memory. Its three parts include the phenomenology of memory, the epistemology of history and the hermeneutics of the historical state, directly related to the notion of duty. At all three levels, the cognitive component is very important, but its nature differs significantly. From Ricoeur's perspective, the duty “not to forget” turns out to be an oath of allegiance to the very ability of human consciousness to construct and reinterpret temporal distance, while maintaining a sense of shock or uniqueness of the event that cannot be replaced by a conventional narrative. It is proved that this approach can be a productive basis for coordinating different conceptual approaches that have emerged in contemporary cognitive research.

Keywords
memory studies, epistemology of history, neuroscience, phenomenology of experience, hermeneutics
Received
02.07.2021
Publication date
15.09.2021
Number of characters
16674
Number of purchasers
2
Views
159
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2021

References

1. Assman A. Novoe nedovol'stvo memorial'noj kul'turoj / per. s nem. B. N. Khlebnikova. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2016.

2. Akhapkin D. N. Kognitivnoe literaturovedenie: ot poryadka k khaosu i obratno // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2017. № 1.

3. Blauberg I. I. O pamyati i zabvenii: P. Riker i A. Bergson // Pol' Riker v Moskve. M.: Kanon+, 2013.

4. Vakhshtajn V. Ot germenevtiki podozreniya k sotsiologii podozritel'nosti: mezhdu Polem Rikerom i Niklasom Lumanom // Logos. 2021. № 3.

5. Vorob'eva O. V., Nikolai F. V. Kriticheskaya teoriya, nejronauki i issledovaniya affekta: problemy transdistsiplinarnogo dialoga // Voprosy filosofii. 2019. № 12.

6. Zhenin I. A. Istoricheskie mify i kollektivnaya pamyat' v prostranstve issledovatel'skikh praktik // Shagi-Steps. 2021. T. 7. № 1.

7. Kognitivnye nauki i istoricheskoe poznanie / pod red. O. V. Vorob'evoj, G. I. Zverevoj. M.: Akvilon, 2020.

8. Malovichko S. I. Fenomenologicheskaya kontseptsiya istochnikovedeniya kak teoreticheskaya osnova istochnikovedeniya istoriografii // Dialog so vremenem. 2013. № 44.

9. Machul'skaya O. I. Moral'no-ehticheskie problemy v kontseptsii pamyati Polya Rikera // Filosofskie nauki. 2019. № 9.

10. Medushevskaya O. M. Teoriya i metodologiya kognitivnoj istorii. M.: RGGU, 2008.

11. Medushevskij A. N. Teoriya kognitivnoj istorii i formirovanie nauchnoj kartiny mira // Dialog so vremenem. 2013. № 44.

12. Motroshilova N. V. Pol' Riker ob aporiyakh vremennogo opyta // Pol' Riker — filosof dialoga / pod red. I. I. Blauberg. M.: IFRAN, 2008.

13. Nikolai F. V., Kobylin I. I. Nuzhen li istorikam povorot k affektu? // Dialog so vremenem. 2020. № 72.

14. Politika pamyati v sovremennoj Rossii i stranakh Vostochnoj Evropy: aktory, instituty, narrativy / pod red. A. I. Millera, D. V. Efremenko. SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Evropejskogo universiteta, 2020.

15. Leontyeva O., Repina L. Images of the Past, Memorial Paradigm and “Memory's Historiography” in Modern Russia // ISTORIYA. 2015. Vol. 6. Issue 9 (42). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840001259-3-1/

16. Riker P. Pamyat', istoriya, zabvenie. M.: Izdatel'stvo gumanitarnoj literatury, 2004.

17. Rumyantseva M. F. Istoricheskoe znanie i istoricheskaya pamyat' v strukture istoricheskoj kul'tury // Dialog so vremenem. 2019. № 67.

18. Rumyantseva M. F. Kontseptsiya kognitivnoj istorii Ol'gi Mikhajlovny Medushevskoj: priglashenie k diskussii // Dialog so vremenem. 2013. № 44.

19. Sabennikova I. V. Teoriya kognitivnoj istorii O. M. Medushevskoj i antropologicheskij metod v sovremennom gumanitarnom poznanii // Dialog so vremenem. 2013. № 44.

20. Sidorova M. Proschenie kak opyt vozmozhnogo: podkhody Kh. Arendt i P. Rikera // Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 2016. № 2.

21. Khabermas Yu. Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe dejstvie / per. s nem. D. V. Sklyadneva. SPb.: Nauka, 2001.

22. Chernigovskaya T. V. «Do opyta priobreli cherty»: mozg cheloveka i porodivshij ego yazyk // Logos. 2014. № 1.

23. Chernigovskaya T. V. Cheshirskaya ulybka kota Shredingera: yazyk i soznanie. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2013.

24. Barash J. A. The Place of Remembrance: Reflections on Paul Ricoeur’s Theory of Collective Memory // A Passion for the Possible: Thinking with Paul Ricoeur / ed. by B. Treanor, H. I. Venema. Fordham University Press, 2010.

25. Lythgoe E. How does Paul Ricoeur apply metapsychology to collective memory? // Études Ricœuriennes / Ricœur Studies. 2017. Vol. 8. № 2.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate