The Past in the Matrix of Memory and Traditions of Historical Writing
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
The Past in the Matrix of Memory and Traditions of Historical Writing
Annotation
PII
S207987840014389-6-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Lorina Repina 
Affiliation:
Institute of World History RAS
Russian State University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

The “cultural turn” in social and humanitarian knowledge has led to an intensive development of various aspects of the problem of collective representations of the past. Today historians are actively interested in how people perceived events of which they were contemporaries or participants, how they stored and broadcast information about these events. Historical memory is an integral part of the culture of any human society. The idea of a common past, being an embodiment of a system of values shared by the community, represented by historical events, heroes, memorable places, act as one of the most important means of creating and maintaining internal unity. The article discusses various interpretations of the phenomenon of memory and historical consciousness. The main attention is paid to the concept of images of the past, with the help of which society forms and maintains its identity through various mechanisms of memorialization and historization of events in public consciousness and reconstruction of the “common past”, each time proceeding from the needs of the present in the relevant perspective. In recent decades, research has made significant progress on the complex phenomenon of historical culture, which acts not only as an articulation of the historical consciousness of society or a set of cultural practices of individuals and groups in relation to the past but includes all cases of the presence of the past in everyday life. Changing ideas about the past is inextricably linked with the processes of accumulation and comprehension of new social experience, the experience of experiencing events that are constantly happening in history. The idea of which event is historical has changed significantly, also because historians have paid attention to the question of the relationship between social memory and the traditions of historical writing, as well as to the place of collective memory in the historian's subjectivity. Speaking equally against the identification of history and memory, and against the absolutization of their differences, the author proposes to turn to a comprehensive analysis of the rational, mental and emotional components of this or that “image of the past” and their correlation at different levels of its formation.

Keywords
historical memory, communicative memory, generation memory, images of the past, myth-building, historicization, historical consciousness, tradition of historical writing
Received
24.10.2020
Publication date
17.05.2021
Number of characters
44592
Number of purchasers
15
Views
1446
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 200 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article and additional services
Whole issue and additional services
All issues and additional services for 2021

References

1. Artog F. Vremya i istoriya // Annaly na rubezhe vekov: antologiya. M., 2002. S. 147—168.

2. Assman Ya. Kul'turnaya pamyat'. Pis'mo, pamyat' o proshlom i politicheskaya identichnost' v vysokikh kul'turakh drevnosti. M.: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2004.

3. Gene B. Istoriya i istoricheskaya kul'tura srednevekovogo Zapada. M., 2001.

4. Le Goff Zh. S nebes na zemlyu // Odissej. Chelovek v istorii. M., 1991.

5. Myslit' istoriyu razumno: Interv'yu s Jornom Ryuzenom // Iz pervykh ust: Istoriki o sebe i istoricheskoj nauke v ehtom bystro menyayuschemsya mire / sost. i obsch. red. L. P. Repinoj. M.: Akvilon, 2020. S. 72—92.

6. Proshloe dlya nastoyaschego: Istoriya-pamyat' i narrativy natsional'noj identichnosti: kollektivnaya monografiya / pod obsch. red. L. P. Repinoj. M.: Akvilon, 2020.

7. Repina L. P. Mezhdu faktom i simvolom: istoricheskie sobytiya v makrostrukture natsional'no-gosudarstvennogo narrativa // Uchenye zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. T. 161. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. Kn. 2—3. Kazan': Izd-vo Kazanskogo un-ta, 2019. S. 9—23.

8. Repina L. P. Sobytiya proshlogo v diskussiyakh nastoyaschego: Istoriya i politika v Britanii «Ehpokhi peremen» // Dialog so vremenem. 2020. Vyp. 73. S. 438—444.

9. Ryuzen J. Mozhet li vchera stat' luchshe? O metamorfozakh proshlogo v istorii // Dialog so vremenem. Vyp. 10. M., 2003.

10. Ryuzen J. Utrachivaya posledovatel'nost' istorii (nekotorye aspekty istoricheskoj nauki na perekrestke modernizma, postmodernizma i diskussii o pamyati) // Dialog so vremenem. 2001. Vyp. 7. M., 2001. S. 8—26.

11. Savel'eva I. M., Poletaev A.V. Znanie o proshlom: teoriya i istoriya: V 2 t. SPb.: Nauka, 2003. T. 1: Konstruirovanie proshlogo. 2003; T. 2: Obrazy proshlogo. 2006.

12. Shnirel'man V. A. Natsional'nye simvoly, ehtno-istoricheskie mify i ehtnopolitika // Teoreticheskie problemy istoricheskikh issledovanij. Vyp. 2. M., 1999.

13. Ehksle O. G. Kul'turnaya pamyat' pod vozdejstviem istorizma // Odissej. 2001. M., 2001. S. 176—198.

14. Ehkshtut S.A. Bitvy za khram Mnemoziny // Dialog so vremenem. 2001. Vyp. 7. S. 27—48.

15. Assman J. Das kulturelle Gedächtnis. München, 1992.

16. Davis N. Z. Ghosts, Kin and Progeny: Some Features of Family Life in Early Modern France // Daedalus. 1977. Vol. 106. № 2. P. 87—114.

17. Fentress J., Wickham C. Social Memory. Oxford, 1992.

18. Mnemosyne. Formen und Funktionen der kulturellen Erinnerung / hg. v. A. Assmann, D. Harth. Frankfurt a. M., 1991.

19. Nora P. Between History and Memory: Les Lieux de Mémoire // Representations. Special Issue: Memory and Counter-Memory. 1989. Vol. 26. № 1. P. 7—24.

20. Nora P. Entre Mémoire et Histoire. La problématique des lieux // Les lieux de mémoire. T. 1. P., 1984.

21. Repina, Lorina. Indywidualne i ponadindywidualne w konceptualizacji pamieci: od dychotomii do syntezy // Sensus Historiae. Studia interdyscyplinarne. 2013. Vol. XI. № 2. S. 43—56. English translation: Repina, Lorina. Individual and Super-Individual in the Conceptualisation of Memory: from Dichotomy to Synthesis [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.sensus-historiae.amu.edu.pl/index.php/sensus/article/view/69/ (data obrascheniya: 02.2021).

22. Rüsen J. Studies in Metahistory. Pretoria, 1993.

23. Rüsen J. Comparing Cultures in Intercultural Communication // Across Cultural Borders: Historiography in Global Perspective / ed. by E. Fuchs and B. Stuchtey. Lanham; Oxford, 2002.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate