Image of Russian Revolution in American Radical Discourse: the Russia’s Social Mission vs the US Liberal Mission
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
Image of Russian Revolution in American Radical Discourse: the Russia’s Social Mission vs the US Liberal Mission
Annotation
PII
S207987840012984-1-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840012984-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Victoriya Zhuravleva 
Affiliation: Russian State University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

The Russian revolution of 1905—1907 and the both revolutions of 1917 turned the dilemma of Russian progress into the subject of American socio-political discourse and became the culmination of the Americans’ first and second crusades for the creation of a democratic Russia. The “demonic” and the “romantic” (both liberal and radical) images of Russia’s revolution integrated into the national identity discourse. Americans “invented” these “mental images” on the basis of their ideology of progress and expansion, their own vision of ideal political and social arrangements, true revolution, the place of the US in the world, and its role in the process of its democratization. This article examines image of the Russian revolution in representations of American radicals by means of а social-constructivist approach to the study of international relations and conceptual pair “the American Self — the Russian Other”. The Russian revolutionary “Other” had turned into the essential element in the identity construction of the American Left during the 1905—1907 Russian revolution. This transformation occurred within the framework of the radical discourse thanks to the efforts of the American “Gentlemen-Socialists” and other representatives of Leftist ideologies in the US, especially the Russian-Jewish emigrants of radical views. All of them saw importance of this revolution in the uniqueness of the social message it was sending to the entire humanity, and not in a movement for the creation of “the United States of Russia”, and used dichotomy the Russia’s social mission vs the US liberal mission. The 1917 revolution in its evolution from February to October changed not only the perception of Russian Revolution as a phenomenon by those American radicals who have been inspired by the Russian social message in 1905–1907 but their vision of socialism as well. The ideological conversion of the “Gentlemen-Socialists” (Arthur Bullard, Ernest Poole, and William English Walling) and radical Progressivists (Rheta Dorr) are in the center of author’s analysis within a “discourse of disappointment”. The comparative context (a “discourse of fascination”) has been represented by conversion of John Reed into Communism and of Albert Williams into the ideology of social justice during their journey to revolutionary Russia in 1917.

Keywords
Russian revolution, American images of Russia, the US liberal mission, the Russia’s social mission, the “Gentlemen-Socialists”, the American Lefts
Received
18.08.2020
Publication date
14.12.2020
Number of characters
67615
Number of purchasers
4
Views
105
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2020
1200 RUB / 20.0 SU

References

1. AMERICANA. Vyp. 16. Amerikantsy v revolyutsionnoj Rossii / pod red. A. I. Kubyshkina i I. I. Kurilly. SPb.; Volgograd, 2020.

2. Bitti B. Krasnoe serdtse Rossii // Rossiya 1917 g. v ehgo-dokumentakh. Zapiski reportera. M., 2016. S. 244—549.

3. Vil'yams A. R. Puteshestvie v revolyutsiyu. Rossiya v ogne Grazhdanskoj vojny 1917—1918 g. M., 2006.

4. Ganelin R. Sh. Rossiya i SShA. 1914—1917 gg. Ocherki istorii russko-amerikanskikh otnoshenij. L., 1969.

5. Zhuravleva V. I. Amerikanskoe puteshestvie v Russkuyu revolyutsiyu: obrazy i mify (1905—1917) // Istoricheskij vestnik. T. 23. Aprel'. S. 153—175.

6. Zhuravleva V. I. Izuchenie russkoj revolyutsii v SShA: akademicheskij diskurs kak diskurs identichnosti // AMERICANA. Vyp. 16. C. 148—165.

7. Zhuravleva V. I. Ponimanie Rossii v SShA: obrazy i mify. 1881—1914. M., 2012.

8. Listikov S. V. SShA i revolyutsionnaya Rossiya v 1917 g. K voprosu ob al'ternativakh amerikanskoj politiki ot Fevralya k Oktyabryu. M., 2006.

9. Mal'kov V.L. Rossiya i SShA v XX v. M., 2009.

10. Mehlloj ml. Dzh. Uil'yam Uolling i ego sobrat'ya «dzhentl'meny-sotsialisty» // SShA: ehkonomika, politika, ideologiya. 1995. № 3. S. 50—59.

11. Anna Strunsky Walling Collection // Huntington Library. Manuscript Division. Box 5.

12. Beatty B. The Red Heart of Russia. The Century Co. 1919.

13. Bryant L. Six Red Months in Russia. Edited and introduced by Lee A. Farrow. Bloomington, 2017.

14. Bullard A. The Russian Pendulum. Autocracy—Democracy—Bolshevism. N. Y., 1919.

15. Bullard A. Russia’s Revolution: 1905—1906 // Princeton University. Mudd Library. Manuscript Division. Arthur Bullard Papers. Box 5.

16. Dictionary of Literary Biography. Vol. 25. American Newspaper Journalists. 1901—1925. Ann Arbor, 1984.

17. Dorr R. Inside the Russian Revolution. N. Y., 1917.

18. Dorr R. Ch. A Woman of Fifty. N. Y., L., 1924.

19. Durland K. The Red Reign. The True Story of an Adventurous Year in Russia. N. Y., 1907.

20. Edwards J. Women of the World. The Great Foreign Correspondents. Boston, 1988.

21. Filler L. Crusaders for American Liberalism. N. Y., 1939.

22. Foglesong D. S. The American Mission and the “Evil Empire”. The Crusade for a “Free Russia” since 1881. N. Y., 2007.

23. Foglesong D. S. America’s Secret War against Bolshevism. U. S. Intervention in the Russian Civil War, 1917—1920. Chapell Hill, 1995.

24. Ginzburg L. The Triumph and Anguish of the Russian Revolution: Bessie Beatty’s Forgotten Chronicle // Journal of Russian American Studies. 2020. Vol. 4. N. 1. P. 48—69.

25. Gompers S., Walling E. W. Their Own Mouths; A Revelation and an Indictment of Sovietism. N. Y., 1921.

26. Jakes J. Great Women Reporters. N. Y., 1969.

27. Jack London. Revolution // Revolution, and other Essays. N. Y., 1906 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.marxists.org/archive/london/revolution/ch01.htm

28. Keefer T. F. Ernest Poole. N. Y., 1966.

29. Kennan G. Soviet-American Relations, 1917—1920. Vol. 1. Russia Leaves the War. Princeton, 1956.

30. Lasch C. The American Liberals and the Russian Revolution. N. Y., 1962.

31. McFadden D. W. Editor’s introduction // Bullard A. The Russian Pendulum: Autocracy—Democracy—Bolshevism. Edited and annotated by David W. McFadden. Bloomington, IN, 2019. P. IX—XIV.

32. McFadden D. W. Alternative Paths: Soviets and Americans, 1917—1920. N. Y., 1993.

33. Poole E. The Bridge. My Own Story. N. Y., 1940.

34. Poole E. The Dark People. N. Y., 1918.

35. Poole E. The Village: Russian Impressions. N. Y., 1918.

36. Reed J. Insurgent Mexico: With Pancho Villa in the Mexican Revolution. N. Y., 1914.

37. Reed J. Ten Days That Shook the World. Introduced and edited by William Benton Whisenhunt. Bloomington, IN, 2017.

38. Ross E. Ladies of the Press. The Story of Women in Journalism by an Insider. N. Y., 1936.

39. Saul N. E. Editor’s introduction // Poole E. The Village: Russian Impressions. Edited and annotated by Norman E. Saul. Bloomington, IN, 2017. P. XVI—XVII.

40. Saul N. E. War and Revolution: The United States and Russia, 1914—1921. Lawrence, 2001.

41. Simeon Strunsky // William English Walling. A Symposium. N. Y., 1938. P. 46—59.

42. Walling E. Russia’s Message. The True World Import of the Revolution. N. Y., 1908.

43. Walling E. W. Sovietism. The ABC of Russian Bolshevism — According to the Bolshevists. N. Y., 1920.

44. Whisenhunt W. B. Editor’s introduction // Reed J. Ten Days That Shook the World. Introduced and edited by William Benton Whisenhunt. Bloomington, IN, 2017. P. XI—XXI.

45. Whisenhunt W. B. Editor’s introduction // Williams A. R. Through the Russian Revolution, edited and introduced by William Benton Whisenhunt. Bloomington, IN, 2016. P. XVII—–XVIII.

46. Williams A. R. Through the Russian Revolution, edited and introduced by William Benton Whisenhunt. Bloomington, IN, 2016.