Conflict of Memories and Historical Knowledge in the Digital Age
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
Conflict of Memories and Historical Knowledge in the Digital Age
Annotation
PII
S207987840012284-1-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840012284-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Elena Trufanova 
Affiliation: State Academic University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Abstract

The article analyzes the problem of conflict of memories on the individual and collective level that became more intensive due to the active usage of the digital technologies. The efficiency of the use of common methodological approaches to the individual and collective memory is shown, in particular — epistemological approaches to the analysis of memory and historical knowledge. It is shown that memory — both individual and collective — is subject to distortions and is constantly being reconstructed, thus memory cannot be taken for the reliable source of knowledge. At the same time many researchers today see collective memory as having moral superiority over history, because history is seen as an ideological tool. It is shown that in contemporary world the digitalization processes intensify local collective memories and that leads to the emergence of contradictions between memories of different social groups that risk to become critical conflicts. It is substantiated that the way of dealing with this conflicts can be shown by turning to the historical knowledge. It is shown that history has epistemological superiority over collective memory, because it deals with knowledge while collective memory deals with opinion. The conclusion is drawn that while collective memory is important for the unification of the members of one social group, the role of history may lie in consolidation of different social groups that build the communities of the bigger scale.

Keywords
collective memory, individual memory, memory conflict, historical knowledge, epistemology, objectivity, witness
Received
14.06.2020
Publication date
15.10.2020
Number of characters
36264
Number of purchasers
7
Views
76
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2020
1200 RUB / 20.0 SU

References

1. Assman A. Dlinnaya ten' proshlogo. Memorial'naya kul'tura i istoricheskaya politika. M., 2014.

2. Bartlett F. Ch. Chelovek zapominaet / Psikhologiya pamyati Ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov: [Khrestomatiya] / pod red. Yu. B. Gippenrejter i V. Ya. Romanova. 3-e izd. M., 2002. S. 292—304.

3. «Vozmozhna li istina v gumanitarnykh naukakh?» Materialy «kruglogo stola». Chast' 1 // Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki. 2017. T. 22. № 2. S. 5—28.

4. «Vozmozhna li istina v gumanitarnykh naukakh?» Materialy «kruglogo stola». Chast' 2 // Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki. 2018. T. 23. № 1. S. 5—28.

5. Zhmurov V. A. Klinicheskaya psikhiatriya. Ehlista, 2010.

6. Nora P. Mezhdu pamyat'yu i istoriej. Problematika mesta pamyati // Frantsiya-pamyat' / red. P. Nora. SPb., 1999. S. 17—50.

7. Trubina E. G. Rasskazannoe Ya: problema personal'noj identichnosti v filosofii sovremennosti. Ekaterinburg, 1995.

8. Trufanova E. O. Individual'naya i kollektivnaya pamyat': tochki peresecheniya // Voprosy filosofii. 2020. № 6. S. 18—22.

9. Trufanova E. O. Informatsionnoe perenasyschenie: klyuchevye problemy // Filosofskie problemy informatsionnykh tekhnologij i kiberprostranstva. 2019. T. 16. № 1. S. 4—21.

10. Trufanova E. O. «Situatsionnoe znanie» i ideal ob'ektivnosti v nauke // Ehpistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2017. № 4. C. 99—110.

11. Fedorova M. M. Istoriya/pamyat': «trudnaya» dilemma // Istoriya filosofii. 2018. T. 23. № 1. S. 108—121.

12. Schedrina I. O. Individual'naya pamyat' i avtobiograficheskij narrativ // Voprosy filosofii. 2020. № 6. S. 28—32.

13. Schedrina I. O. Formirovanie obraza Ya v avtobiograficheskom narrative: ehpistemologicheskij aspekt // Vestnik Russkoj khristianskoj gumanitarnoj akademii. 2017. T. 18. № 4. S. 115—120.

14. Barnier A. J., Hoskins A. Is there memory in the head, in the wild? // Memory Studies. 2018. Vol. 11. Is. 4. P. 386—390.

15. Featherstone M., Lash S., Robertson R. Global Modernities. SAGE, 1995.

16. Hacking I. The looping effects of human kinds // Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Oxford, 1995. P. 351—393.

17. Hardcastle V. G. Constructing the Self. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, 2008.

18. Prince G. Narratology: The Form and Function of Narrative. Berlin, 1982.

19. Sarbin T. R. The narrative as root metaphor for psychology // Narrative Psychology: The Storied Nature of Human Conduct. N. Y., 1986. P. 3—21.