“Russian World”, “Tatar World” and “History of Kryashens”: Historical Components of (Neo)colonial Miths in Contemporary Tatarstan
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
“Russian World”, “Tatar World” and “History of Kryashens”: Historical Components of (Neo)colonial Miths in Contemporary Tatarstan
Annotation
PII
S207987840012219-9-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840012219-9
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Aleksander Ovchinnikov 
Affiliation: Tomsk State University
Address: Russian Federation, Tomsk
Abstract

The subject of the research is the subordinate competing ideologies of the “Russian world”, “Tatar world” and “history of Kryashens”. They are compared with the features of the organization and relationship of state and administrative-territorial divisions: the Russian Federation, Tatarstan, and Pestrechinsky district. The authors state that it is impossible to attribute the population of this political space as a “Russian nation”. It is interpreted as (neo)empires with a “metropolis” and political and administrative units that can become sovereign if the Center is weakened. The construct of the “Russian world” is represented by the ideologeme of the “metropolis”, which benefits from seeing a “cultural core” that implies the presence of the periphery. The history of the country is identified with the history of the “metropolis”. The Tatar world is a mirror image of the Russian world in its main parameters and serves as the ideologeme of one of the republics within Russia — Tatarstan. The historical narratives of the “Tatar world” are supported by regional authorities and justify the historical predestination of Tatarstan's statehood. The mythologems of history of Kryashens, which are not supported by the authorities, reflect the social protest of the Kryashen national minority living in several rural districts of Tatarstan, including Pestrechinsky. Relations between Kazan (the capital of Tatarstan) and districts, myths of the history of the Tatars and the history of Kryashens reproduce (neo)the Imperial situation.

Keywords
“Russian nation”, “Russian world”, “Tatar world”, “history of Kryashen”, (neo)empire
Received
14.04.2020
Publication date
15.10.2020
Number of characters
32574
Number of purchasers
8
Views
157
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2020
1200 RUB / 20.0 SU

References

1. Ajnutdinova L. M., Khamidullin B. L. Atninskij rajon: kreposti Bulgarii, starejshaya v RT mechet', rodina Mardzhani i «kolkhozno-sovkhoznyj teatr. 31.07.2016 // IA «Real'noe vremya» [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://realnoevremya.ru/articles/38432 (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2020).

2. Butalij S. V. Osobennosti germanskogo kolonial'nogo ehtosa i otnosheniya mezhdu nemtsami i afrikantsami v Yugo-zapadnoj Afrike (1884—1914) // Izvestiya Rossijskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta imeni A. I. Gertsena. Aspirantskie tetradi. SPb., 2008. № 33 (73). Ch. 1: Obschestvennye i gumanitarnye nauki. S. 78—84.

3. Desyat' podarkov ot regionov poluchit Astana k svoemu 20-letnemu yubileyu. 01.03.2018 // TOO «Infopolis» [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://informburo.kz/novosti/desyat-podarkov-ot-regionov-poluchit-astana-k-svoemu-20-letnemu-yubileyu.html (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2020).

4. Istoriki poprobovali svesti balans v prepodavanii svoego predmeta v shkole. 26.09.2013 // «Kommersant'». [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2305195 (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2020).

5. Istoriya i kul'tura tatar-kryashen (XVI—XX vv.). Kazan', 2017.

6. Iskhakov D. M. K voprosu o kontseptsii natsional'noj istorii tatar // Natsional'naya istoriya tatar: teoretiko-metodologicheskoe vedenie. Kazan', 2009. S. 5—18.

7. Iskhakov D. M. Tatary: perepis' i politika. Kazan', 2010.

8. Iskhakov R. R. Khristianskoe prosveschenie i formirovanie kul'turno-religioznykh institutov tatar-kryashen Volgo-Ural'skogo regiona (poslednyaya tret' XVIII — nachalo XX vv.): Dis. … dokt. ist. nauk. Kazan', 2017.

9. Materialy po zaschite dissertatsii (Iskhakov R. R.) // Chuvashskij gosudarstvennyj universitet [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.chuvsu.ru/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=7971&Itemid=311 (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2020).

10. Mintimer Shajmiev: «Vozrozhdennaya zemlya Bolgara dolzhna napolnit'sya prekrasnym soderzhaniem». 21.07.2018 // Ofitsial'nyj sajt Prezidenta Respubliki Tatarstan [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://president.tatarstan.ru/rus/index.htm/news/1246793.htm (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2020).

11. Ovchinnikov A. V. Arijskij mif v natsionalizmakh sovremennogo Tatarstana // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2017. № 415. S. 86—101.

12. Ovchinnikov A. V. «Istoriya i kul'tura tatar-kryashen (XVI—XX vv.). Kazan', 2017»: istoricheskaya travma nasil'stvennoj khristianizatsii i popytka eyo ratsionalizatsii // Ehtnos. Obschestvo. Tsivilizatsiya: Pyatye Kuzeevskie chteniya. Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii (Ufa, 27—28 sentyabrya 2018 g.). Ufa, 2018. S. 572—579.

13. Ovchinnikov A. V. Sovremennaya istoriya Pestrechinskogo rajona Tatarstana v diskurse sotsial'no-kul'turnoj antropologii (opyt issledovaniya) // Razvitie regionovedcheskikh issledovanij v Rossijskoj Federatsii: osobennosti i osnovnye napravleniya: sbornik statej Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii (g. Kazan', 7 dekabrya 2018 g.) / Institut tatarskoj ehntsiklopedii i regionovedeniya AN RT / otv. red.: R. V. Shajdullin, L. M. Ajnutdinova. Kazan', 2018. S. 289—305.

14. Pain Eh. Narodnyj suverenitet ili ofitsial'naya narodnost': al'ternativy natsional'noj politiki v Rossii, 03.12.2016 // Polit.ru [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://xn-www-idd.ruthenia.ru/article/2016/12/03/pain/ (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2020).

15. Pamyatnyj znak sakhabam // Bolgarskij gosudarstvennyj istoriko-arkhitekturnyj muzej-zapovednik [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://bolgar.mobi/ru/poi/19/ (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2020).

16. Prazdnichnye i pamyatnye dni // Ofitsial'nyj Tatarstan [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://tatarstan.ru/about/holidays.htm (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2020).

17. Retsenzii na federal'nye uchebniki po istorii Otechestva. Kazan', 2008.

18. Sulejmanov R. Kryashenskaya derevnya v Tatarstane: bezdorozh'e, strausovodstvo i «tatarizatsiya», 09.11.2010 // IA REGNUM [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://regnum.ru/news/1344580.html (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2020).

19. Tagirov I. Gorod, ustremlennyj v veka // Tatarstan. 2005. № 12. S. 34—37.

20. Tagirov I. R. Federatsiya — sud'ba Rossii // Tagirov I. R. Gody, ravnye vekam: stat'i, ocherki, vospominaniya. Kazan', 2016. S. 173—185.

21. Tishkov V. A. I russkij, i rossijskij // Vestnik rossijskoj natsii. Spetsvypusk 2008—2016. № 51. S. 44—56.

22. Tishkov V. A. Rossijskaya natsiya i ee kritiki // Natsionalizm v mirovoj istorii / pod red. V. A. Tishkova, V. A. Shnirel'mana; Institut ehtnologii i antropologii im. N. N. Miklukho-Maklaya. M., 2007. S. 558—601.

23. «To odin rajon ograbit, to drugoj»: kak smenilas' vlast' v Pestretsakh i Rybnoj Slobode. 17.01.2018 // «BIZNES Online» [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.business-gazeta.ru/article/369792 (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2020).

24. Fokin A., Mamakov N. Doktorskaya dissertatsiya ili ideologicheskij zakaz? 8.06.2018 // Informatsionno-analiticheskaya sluzhba «Russkaya narodnaya liniya» [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://ruskline.ru/analitika/2018/06/08/doktorskaya_dissertaciya_ili_ideologicheskij_zakaz/ (data obrascheniya: 01.08.2018)

25. Materialy po zaschite dissertatsii (Iskhakov R.R.) // Chuvashskij gosudarstvennyj universitet [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.chuvsu.ru/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=7971&Itemid=311 (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2020).

26. Fokin A. V. Ehtnogenez kryashen kak nauchnaya problema i ob'ektivnaya real'nost' // Fokin A. V. Kryasheny — sud'ba moya: ehpizody istorii, teorii i praktiki kryashenskogo natsional'nogo dvizheniya / Sbornik materialov. Kazan', 2013. S. 72—87.

27. Cheshko S. V. «Russkij vopros» v ehtnopoliticheskom kontekste // Vestnik antropologii. 2018. № 2 (42). S. 5—23.

28. Postanovlenie KM RT ot 21.10.2013. № 785. Ob utverzhdenii Gosudarstvennoj programmy Respubliki Tatarstan «Sokhranenie natsional'noj identichnosti tatarskogo naroda (2014—2016 gg.)» // Informatsionnyj portal Respubliki Tatarstan «Tatar» [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://tatar7.info/2013/10/21/t4382.htm (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2020).

29. Armyakova O. Drevnij Khersones — kolybel' pravoslaviya. 05.12.2014 // Setevoe izdanie «Vesti.Ru» [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=2175454 (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2020).

30. Tatarstan protivostoit stoyaniyu na reke Ugre, 14.12.2017 // «Kommersant'». № 233 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3495564 (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2020).

31. Den' Krescheniya Rusi 28 iyulya. Dos'e, 27.07.2018 // IA TASS [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://tass.ru/info/5407995 (data obrascheniya: 01.05.2020).