“Zhaloba” (“Complaint”) in the 12th-century Kievan Chronicle
Table of contents
Share
Metrics
“Zhaloba” (“Complaint”) in the 12th-century Kievan Chronicle
Annotation
PII
S207987840010608-7-1
DOI
10.18254/S207987840010608-7
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Tatiana Vilkul 
Affiliation: Institute of History of Ukraine of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Address: Ukraine, Kiev
Abstract

Old Church Slavonic “zhaloba” means both ‘complaint, grief’, and, in terminological sense, ‘petition’. The latter is attested in Rus administrating writing at least from the late 13th and the early 14th centuries. The article aims to clarify the time of the first occurrence of “zhaloba” in that terminological meaning, basing on the 12th-century Kievan Chronicle, which is the South Rus continuation of the Tale of Bygone Years (Povest’ vremennykh let). Both Old Rus and Latin chronicles included primary documents, often not in the form of the direct copies, but as re-written narratives. It is traditionally suggested that the messages of princes and envoys quoted in the Kievan Chronicle reflect the materials from the princely archives. Very little survives from the administrative writing of Southern Rus, but, according to some indirect data, it was developing productively, and chroniclers really worked with documents. Of course, all messages can not be taken at face-value as the copies of primary documents, because there are traces of the usage of bookish sources (chronography, homiletics) in them. However, it seems that in some cases they reflect the influence of administrative writing, including those where the word “zhaloba” occurs. The existing dictionaries omit the contexts of the Kievan Chronicle, taking into consideration only the entries the Tale of Bygone Years s.a. 1100 and the early 13th-century notes of the Novgorodian First Chronicle. Meanwhile, we have three occurrences in the Kievan Chronicle, s.a. 1147, 1148 and 1174, in the descriptions of official princes’ meetings or envoys’ missions, so one can assume that the chroniclers used some contemporary records. The latter were probably edited, that is, affirmed by inner discrepancies and various sets of the favorite words of the Kievan editors. Also, we cannot exclude a possibility that we come across with the chroniclers’ paraphrases or even pure reconstructions, but, even if so, it seems that the scribes imitated the official protocols of their time. Thus “zhaloba” in terminological meaning of ‘petition‘ occurs much earlier than the late 13th century, already in the 12th-century Kievan Chronicle.

Keywords
Old Rus, Middle Ages, chronicles, annals, Kievan Chronicle, administrative writing, Southern Rus, Kiev, complaint
Received
06.03.2020
Publication date
30.07.2020
Number of characters
35223
Number of purchasers
5
Views
109
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite Download pdf 100 RUB / 1.0 SU

To download PDF you should sign in

Full text is available to subscribers only
Subscribe right now
Only article
100 RUB / 1.0 SU
Whole issue
1000 RUB / 10.0 SU
All issues for 2020
1200 RUB / 20.0 SU

References

1. Vilkul T. L. Letopis' i khronograf: Tekstologiya domongol'skogo kievskogo letopisaniya. M., 2019.

2. Vilkul T. L. O proiskhozhdenii obschego teksta Ipat'evskoj i Lavrent'evskoj letopisi za XII v. (predvaritel'nye zametki) // Palaeoslavica. Sambridge (Mass.), 2005. Vol. 13. № 1. R. 21—80.

3. Gimon T. V. K voprosu o knyazheskikh poslaniyakh v Kievskom svode (KhІІ v.) // Vostochnaya Evropa v drevnosti i srednevekov'e: KhKhKh Yubilejnye Chteniya pamyati chl.-korr. AN SSSR V. T. Pashuto, 17—20 aprelya 2018 g.: Mat-ly konf. M., 2018. S. 64—71.

4. Kievskaya letopis' / izd. podgot. I.S. Yur'eva. M., 2017.

5. Mescherskij N. A. Istoriya Iudejskoj vojny Iosifa Flaviya v drevnerusskom perevode. M.; L., 1958.

6. Novgorodskaya pervaya pervaya letopis' starshego i mladshego izvodov / pod red. i s predisloviem A. N. Nasonova M.; L., 1950.

7. Orlov A. S. K voprosu ob Ipat'evskoj letopisi // Izv. Otd. rus. yaz. i slovesnosti Akademii nauk. L., 1926. T. 31. S. 93—126.

8. PSRL — Polnoe sobranie russkikh letopisej. M., 1997. T. 1: Lavrent'evskaya letopis'; M., 1998. T. 2: Ipat'evskaya letopis'. M., 2001; SPb., 2002. T. 42: Novgorodskaya Karamzinskaya letopis'. SPb., 2002.

9. Slovar' drevnerusskogo yazyka XI—XIV vv. M., 1990. Vyp. 3.

10. Slovar' russkogo yazyka XI—XVII vv. M., 1978. Vyp. 5.

11. Sreznevskij I. I. Materialy dlya slovarya drevnerusskogo yazyka. M., 2003. T. 1.

12. Tolochko A. P. O vremeni sozdaniya Kievskogo svoda «1200 g.» // Ruthenica. Kiїv, 2006. T. 5. S. 73—87

13. Franchuk V. Yu. Kievskaya letopis': Sostav i istochniki v lingvisticheskom osveschenii. Kiev, 1986.

14. The Povest’ vremennykh let: An Interlinear Collation and Paradosis / ed. D. Ostrowski, D. Birnbaum, H. Lunt. Cambridge (Mass.), 2003.

15. Slovnik jazyka staroslovenskeho. Praha, 1959. Ses. 2.